Impact of Biotransformation on Internal Concentrations and Specificity Classification of Organic Chemicals in the Zebrafish Embryo (Danio rerio).

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c04156
Nico Grasse, Riccardo Massei, Bettina Seiwert, Stefan Scholz, Beate I Escher, Thorsten Reemtsma, Qiuguo Fu
{"title":"Impact of Biotransformation on Internal Concentrations and Specificity Classification of Organic Chemicals in the Zebrafish Embryo (<i>Danio rerio</i>).","authors":"Nico Grasse, Riccardo Massei, Bettina Seiwert, Stefan Scholz, Beate I Escher, Thorsten Reemtsma, Qiuguo Fu","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c04156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal concentrations (ICs) are crucial for linking exposure to effects in the development of New Approach Methodologies. ICs of chemicals in aquatic organisms are primarily driven by hydrophobicity and modulated by biotransformation and efflux. Comparing the predicted baseline to observed toxicity enables the estimation of effect specificity, but biological processes can lead to overestimating ICs and bias the specificity assessment. To evaluate the prediction of a mass balance model (MBM) and the impact of biotransformation on ICs, experimental ICs of 63 chemicals in zebrafish embryos were compared to predictions with physicochemical properties as input parameters. Experimental ICs of 79% (50 of 63) of the chemicals deviated less than 10-fold from predictions, and the remaining 13 deviated up to a factor of 90. Using experimental ICs changed the classification for 19 chemicals, with ICs 5 to 90 times lower than predicted, showing the bias of specificity classification. Uptake kinetics of pirinixic acid, genistein, dexamethasone, ethoprophos, atorvastatin, and niflumic acid were studied over a 96 h exposure period, and transformation products (TPs) were elucidated using suspect- and nontarget screening with UPLC-HRMS. 35 TPs (5 to 8 TPs per compound) were tentatively identified and semiquantified based on peak areas, suggesting that biotransformation may partly account for the overpredictions of ICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal concentrations (ICs) are crucial for linking exposure to effects in the development of New Approach Methodologies. ICs of chemicals in aquatic organisms are primarily driven by hydrophobicity and modulated by biotransformation and efflux. Comparing the predicted baseline to observed toxicity enables the estimation of effect specificity, but biological processes can lead to overestimating ICs and bias the specificity assessment. To evaluate the prediction of a mass balance model (MBM) and the impact of biotransformation on ICs, experimental ICs of 63 chemicals in zebrafish embryos were compared to predictions with physicochemical properties as input parameters. Experimental ICs of 79% (50 of 63) of the chemicals deviated less than 10-fold from predictions, and the remaining 13 deviated up to a factor of 90. Using experimental ICs changed the classification for 19 chemicals, with ICs 5 to 90 times lower than predicted, showing the bias of specificity classification. Uptake kinetics of pirinixic acid, genistein, dexamethasone, ethoprophos, atorvastatin, and niflumic acid were studied over a 96 h exposure period, and transformation products (TPs) were elucidated using suspect- and nontarget screening with UPLC-HRMS. 35 TPs (5 to 8 TPs per compound) were tentatively identified and semiquantified based on peak areas, suggesting that biotransformation may partly account for the overpredictions of ICs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物转化对斑马鱼胚胎(Danio rerio)中有机化学品内部浓度和特异性分类的影响。
内部浓度(ICs)对于将暴露与影响联系起来以制定新方法至关重要。化学品在水生生物体内的内部浓度主要由疏水性驱动,并受生物转化和外流的调节。将预测基线与观察到的毒性进行比较,可以估算效应特异性,但生物过程可能会导致高估 IC,并使特异性评估出现偏差。为了评估质量平衡模型(MBM)的预测结果以及生物转化对 ICs 的影响,将 63 种化学物质在斑马鱼胚胎中的实验 ICs 与以物理化学特性为输入参数的预测结果进行了比较。79%的化学品(63 种中的 50 种)的实验 IC 与预测值的偏差小于 10 倍,其余 13 种偏差高达 90 倍。使用实验集成电路改变了 19 种化学物质的分类,其集成电路比预测值低 5 到 90 倍,显示了特异性分类的偏差。在 96 小时的暴露期内研究了吡蚜酮、染料木素、地塞米松、乙磷磷、阿托伐他汀和硝氟酸的吸收动力学,并利用 UPLC-HRMS 进行可疑目标和非目标筛选,阐明了转化产物(TPs)。根据峰面积初步确定并半定量了 35 种 TPs(每种化合物 5 至 8 种 TPs),这表明生物转化可能是 ICs 预测过高的部分原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
Resolving Atmospheric Oxygenated Organic Molecules in Urban Beijing Using Online Ultrahigh-Resolution Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry Iron Nanoparticles-Confined Graphene Oxide Membranes Coupled with Sulfite-Based Advanced Reduction Processes for Highly Efficient and Stable Removal of Bromate Proton vs Electron: The Dual Role of Redox-Inactive Metal Ions in Permanganate Oxidation Kinetics The Overlooked Role of Humin in Dark Hydroxyl Radical Production during Oxygenation VUV Activated Fe(VI) by Promoting the Generation of Intermediate Valent Iron and Hydroxyl Radicals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1