Renaud Decarsin, Joannès Guillemot, Guerric le Maire, Haben Blondeel, Céline Meredieu, Emma Achard, Damien Bonal, Hervé Cochard, Déborah Corso, Sylvain Delzon, Zoé Doucet, Arsène Druel, Charlotte Grossiord, José Manuel Torres-Ruiz, Jürgen Bauhus, Douglas L. Godbold, Peter Hajek, Hervé Jactel, Joel Jensen, Simone Mereu, Quentin Ponette, Boris Rewald, Julien Ruffault, Hans Sandén, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Hernán Serrano-León, Guillaume Simioni, Kris Verheyen, Ramona Werner, Nicolas Martin-StPaul
{"title":"Tree drought–mortality risk depends more on intrinsic species resistance than on stand species diversity","authors":"Renaud Decarsin, Joannès Guillemot, Guerric le Maire, Haben Blondeel, Céline Meredieu, Emma Achard, Damien Bonal, Hervé Cochard, Déborah Corso, Sylvain Delzon, Zoé Doucet, Arsène Druel, Charlotte Grossiord, José Manuel Torres-Ruiz, Jürgen Bauhus, Douglas L. Godbold, Peter Hajek, Hervé Jactel, Joel Jensen, Simone Mereu, Quentin Ponette, Boris Rewald, Julien Ruffault, Hans Sandén, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Hernán Serrano-León, Guillaume Simioni, Kris Verheyen, Ramona Werner, Nicolas Martin-StPaul","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing tree diversity is considered a key management option to adapt forests to climate change. However, the effect of species diversity on a forest's ability to cope with extreme drought remains elusive. In this study, we assessed drought tolerance (xylem vulnerability to cavitation) and water stress (water potential), and combined them into a metric of drought–mortality risk (hydraulic safety margin) during extreme 2021 or 2022 summer droughts in five European tree diversity experiments encompassing different biomes. Overall, we found that drought–mortality risk was primarily driven by species identity (56.7% of the total variability), while tree diversity had a much lower effect (8% of the total variability). This result remained valid at the local scale (i.e within experiment) and across the studied European biomes. Tree diversity effect on drought–mortality risk was mediated by changes in water stress intensity, not by changes in xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Significant diversity effects were observed in all experiments, but those effects often varied from positive to negative across mixtures for a given species. Indeed, we found that the composition of the mixtures (i.e., the identities of the species mixed), but not the species richness of the mixture per se, is a driver of tree drought–mortality risk. This calls for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms before tree diversity can be considered an operational adaption tool to extreme drought. Forest diversification should be considered jointly with management strategies focussed on favouring drought-tolerant species.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"30 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasing tree diversity is considered a key management option to adapt forests to climate change. However, the effect of species diversity on a forest's ability to cope with extreme drought remains elusive. In this study, we assessed drought tolerance (xylem vulnerability to cavitation) and water stress (water potential), and combined them into a metric of drought–mortality risk (hydraulic safety margin) during extreme 2021 or 2022 summer droughts in five European tree diversity experiments encompassing different biomes. Overall, we found that drought–mortality risk was primarily driven by species identity (56.7% of the total variability), while tree diversity had a much lower effect (8% of the total variability). This result remained valid at the local scale (i.e within experiment) and across the studied European biomes. Tree diversity effect on drought–mortality risk was mediated by changes in water stress intensity, not by changes in xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Significant diversity effects were observed in all experiments, but those effects often varied from positive to negative across mixtures for a given species. Indeed, we found that the composition of the mixtures (i.e., the identities of the species mixed), but not the species richness of the mixture per se, is a driver of tree drought–mortality risk. This calls for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms before tree diversity can be considered an operational adaption tool to extreme drought. Forest diversification should be considered jointly with management strategies focussed on favouring drought-tolerant species.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.