Evaluating the Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR mHealth and uHealth Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.2196/55819
Chiyembekezo Kachimanga, Haules Robbins Zaniku, Titus Henry Divala, Johannes C F Ket, Joia S Mukherjee, Daniel Palazuelos, Alexandra V Kulinkina, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Thomas van den Akker
{"title":"Evaluating the Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review.","authors":"Chiyembekezo Kachimanga, Haules Robbins Zaniku, Titus Henry Divala, Johannes C F Ket, Joia S Mukherjee, Daniel Palazuelos, Alexandra V Kulinkina, Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde, Thomas van den Akker","doi":"10.2196/55819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited information exists on the impact of mobile health (mHealth) use by community health workers (CHWs) on improving the use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review addresses 2 objectives: evaluating the impact of mHealth use by CHWs on antenatal care (ANC) use, facility-based births, and postnatal care (PNC) use in SSA; and identifying facilitators and barriers to mHealth use by CHWs in programs designed to increase ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA using a sociotechnical system approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for articles in 6 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Africa Index Medicus) from inception up to September 2022, with additional articles identified from Google Scholar. After article selection, 2 independent reviewers performed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction using Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). In addition, we manually screened the references lists of the included articles. Finally, we performed a narrative synthesis of the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2594 records retrieved, 10 (0.39%) studies (n=22, 0.85% articles) met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. The studies were published between 2012 and 2022 in 6 countries. Of the studies reporting on ANC outcomes, 43% (3/7) reported that mHealth use by CHWs increased ANC use. Similarly, of the studies reporting on facility-based births, 89% (8/9) demonstrated an increase due to mHealth use by CHWs. In addition, in the PNC studies, 75% (3/4) showed increased PNC use associated with mHealth use by CHWs. Many of the studies reported on the importance of addressing factors related to the social environment of mHealth-enabled CHWs, including the perception of CHWs by the community, trust, relationships, digital literacy, training, mentorship and supervision, skills, CHW program ownership, and the provision of incentives. Very few studies reported on how program goals and culture influenced mHealth use by CHWs. Providing free equipment, accessories, and internet connectivity while addressing ongoing challenges with connectivity, power, the ease of using mHealth software, and equipment maintenance support allowed mHealth-enabled CHW programs to thrive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mHealth use by CHWs was associated with an increase in ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA. Identifying and addressing social and technical barriers to the use of mHealth is essential to ensure the success of mHealth programs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"12 ","pages":"e55819"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited information exists on the impact of mobile health (mHealth) use by community health workers (CHWs) on improving the use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).

Objective: This systematic review addresses 2 objectives: evaluating the impact of mHealth use by CHWs on antenatal care (ANC) use, facility-based births, and postnatal care (PNC) use in SSA; and identifying facilitators and barriers to mHealth use by CHWs in programs designed to increase ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA using a sociotechnical system approach.

Methods: We searched for articles in 6 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Africa Index Medicus) from inception up to September 2022, with additional articles identified from Google Scholar. After article selection, 2 independent reviewers performed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction using Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). In addition, we manually screened the references lists of the included articles. Finally, we performed a narrative synthesis of the outcomes.

Results: Among the 2594 records retrieved, 10 (0.39%) studies (n=22, 0.85% articles) met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. The studies were published between 2012 and 2022 in 6 countries. Of the studies reporting on ANC outcomes, 43% (3/7) reported that mHealth use by CHWs increased ANC use. Similarly, of the studies reporting on facility-based births, 89% (8/9) demonstrated an increase due to mHealth use by CHWs. In addition, in the PNC studies, 75% (3/4) showed increased PNC use associated with mHealth use by CHWs. Many of the studies reported on the importance of addressing factors related to the social environment of mHealth-enabled CHWs, including the perception of CHWs by the community, trust, relationships, digital literacy, training, mentorship and supervision, skills, CHW program ownership, and the provision of incentives. Very few studies reported on how program goals and culture influenced mHealth use by CHWs. Providing free equipment, accessories, and internet connectivity while addressing ongoing challenges with connectivity, power, the ease of using mHealth software, and equipment maintenance support allowed mHealth-enabled CHW programs to thrive.

Conclusions: mHealth use by CHWs was associated with an increase in ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA. Identifying and addressing social and technical barriers to the use of mHealth is essential to ensure the success of mHealth programs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估撒哈拉以南非洲社区保健工作者采用移动保健技术改善孕产妇保健服务的情况:系统回顾。
背景在撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA),社区卫生工作人员使用移动医疗(mHealth)对提高孕产妇保健服务使用率的影响方面的信息有限:本系统性综述涉及两个目标:评估撒哈拉以南非洲地区社区保健员使用移动医疗对产前护理 (ANC) 使用、设施内分娩和产后护理 (PNC) 使用的影响;使用社会技术系统方法确定旨在提高撒哈拉以南非洲地区产前护理 (ANC) 使用、设施内分娩和产后护理 (PNC) 使用的项目中社区保健员使用移动医疗的促进因素和障碍:我们在 6 个数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus 和 Africa Index Medicus)中搜索了从开始到 2022 年 9 月的文章,并从 Google Scholar 中找到了其他文章。文章筛选后,由两名独立审稿人使用 Covidence 软件(Veritas Health Innovation Ltd)进行标题和摘要筛选、全文筛选和数据提取。此外,我们还对纳入文章的参考文献列表进行了人工筛选。最后,我们对结果进行了叙述性综合:在检索到的 2594 条记录中,有 10 项(0.39%)研究(n=22,0.85% 篇文章)符合纳入标准并进行了数据提取。这些研究发表于 2012 年至 2022 年,分布在 6 个国家。在报告产前检查结果的研究中,43%(3/7)的研究报告称,保健工作者使用移动医疗提高了产前检查的使用率。同样,在报告设施内分娩情况的研究中,89%(8/9)的研究表明,由于保健医生使用了移动医疗,设施内分娩情况有所改善。此外,在有关新生儿护理的研究中,75%(3/4)的研究表明,新生儿护理的使用与保健工作者使用移动保健服务有关。许多研究报告了解决与支持移动医疗的社区保健工作者的社会环境有关的因素的重要性,包括社区对社区保健工作者的看法、信任、关系、数字扫盲、培训、指导和监督、技能、社区保健工作者计划的所有权以及提供激励措施。只有极少数研究报告了项目目标和文化是如何影响社区保健工作者使用移动医疗的。提供免费的设备、配件和互联网连接,同时解决连接、电力、移动医疗软件的易用性以及设备维护支持等方面的持续挑战,使支持移动医疗的保健医生项目得以蓬勃发展。结论:在 SSA,保健医生使用移动医疗与 ANC 使用、设施内分娩和 PNC 使用的增加有关。识别并解决使用移动医疗的社会和技术障碍对于确保移动医疗项目的成功至关重要:PERCORO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
期刊最新文献
A Remote Patient Monitoring System With Feedback Mechanisms Using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation, and Evaluation Based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial. Implementation of a Technology-Based Mobile Obstetric Referral Emergency System (MORES): Qualitative Assessment of Health Workers in Rural Liberia. Evaluating the Sensitivity of Wearable Devices in Posttranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Functional Assessment. Using a Quality-Controlled Dataset From ViSi Mobile Monitoring for Analyzing Posture Patterns of Hospitalized Patients: Retrospective Observational Study. Validity of a Consumer-Based Wearable to Measure Clinical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Healthy Controls: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1