How cage effects can hurt statistical analyses of completely randomized designs.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1177/00236772241276785
Reid D Landes
{"title":"How cage effects can hurt statistical analyses of completely randomized designs.","authors":"Reid D Landes","doi":"10.1177/00236772241276785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cage effects: some researchers worry about them, some don't, and some aren't even aware of them. When statistical analyses do <i>not</i> account for cage effects, there is real reason to worry. Regardless of researchers' worries or lack thereof, all researchers should be aware of <i>how</i> cage effects can affect the results. The \"how\" depends, in part, on the experimental design. Here, I (a) define cage effects; (b) illustrate a completely randomized design (CRD) often used in animal experiments; (c) explain how statistical significance is artificially inflated when cage effects are ignored and (d) give guidance on proper analyses and on how to increase statistical power in CRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"476-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241276785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cage effects: some researchers worry about them, some don't, and some aren't even aware of them. When statistical analyses do not account for cage effects, there is real reason to worry. Regardless of researchers' worries or lack thereof, all researchers should be aware of how cage effects can affect the results. The "how" depends, in part, on the experimental design. Here, I (a) define cage effects; (b) illustrate a completely randomized design (CRD) often used in animal experiments; (c) explain how statistical significance is artificially inflated when cage effects are ignored and (d) give guidance on proper analyses and on how to increase statistical power in CRDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
笼效应如何影响完全随机设计的统计分析?
笼子效应:有些研究人员担心笼子效应,有些不担心,有些甚至没有意识到笼子效应。当统计分析没有考虑笼子效应时,确实有理由担心。无论研究人员是否担心,所有研究人员都应该意识到笼效应会如何影响研究结果。至于 "如何",部分取决于实验设计。在此,我将(a) 给笼子效应下一个定义;(b) 举例说明动物实验中经常使用的完全随机设计(CRD);(c) 解释当笼子效应被忽视时,统计显著性是如何被人为夸大的;(d) 指导如何进行正确的分析,以及如何提高 CRD 的统计功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory, hemodynamic, and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in sheep. Management of zoonoses in research institutions - lessons learned from a Coxiella burnetii outbreak case. An innovative approach for health and safety training and occupational health program annual enrollment for laboratory animal care and use personnel. Extended oxygen supplementation after thoracotomy in rats may improve welfare. Animal researchers' views on the publication of negative results and subsequent policy adoptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1