Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ehs.2024.24
Bing Dong, Silvia Paracchini, Andy Gardner
{"title":"Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects.","authors":"Bing Dong, Silvia Paracchini, Andy Gardner","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The frequency of left-handedness in humans is ~10% worldwide and slightly higher in males than females. Twin and family studies estimate the heritability of human handedness at around 25%. The low but substantial frequency of left-handedness has been suggested to imply negative frequency-dependent selection, e.g. owing to a 'surprise' advantage of left-handers in combat against opponents more used to fighting right-handers. Because such game-theoretic hypotheses involve social interaction, here we perform an analysis of the evolution of handedness based on kin-selection, which is understood to play a major role in the evolution of social behaviour generally. We show that: (1) relatedness modulates the balance of right-handedness vs. left-handedness, according to whether left-handedness is marginally selfish vs. marginally altruistic; (2) sex differences in relatedness to social partners may drive sex differences in handedness; (3) differential relatedness of parents and offspring may generate parent-offspring conflict and sexual conflict leading to the evolution of maternal and paternal genetic effects in relation to handedness; and (4) differential relatedness of maternal-origin vs. paternal-origin genes may generate intragenomic conflict leading to the evolution of parent-of-origin-specific gene effects - such as 'genomic imprinting' - and associated maladaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"e32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequency of left-handedness in humans is ~10% worldwide and slightly higher in males than females. Twin and family studies estimate the heritability of human handedness at around 25%. The low but substantial frequency of left-handedness has been suggested to imply negative frequency-dependent selection, e.g. owing to a 'surprise' advantage of left-handers in combat against opponents more used to fighting right-handers. Because such game-theoretic hypotheses involve social interaction, here we perform an analysis of the evolution of handedness based on kin-selection, which is understood to play a major role in the evolution of social behaviour generally. We show that: (1) relatedness modulates the balance of right-handedness vs. left-handedness, according to whether left-handedness is marginally selfish vs. marginally altruistic; (2) sex differences in relatedness to social partners may drive sex differences in handedness; (3) differential relatedness of parents and offspring may generate parent-offspring conflict and sexual conflict leading to the evolution of maternal and paternal genetic effects in relation to handedness; and (4) differential relatedness of maternal-origin vs. paternal-origin genes may generate intragenomic conflict leading to the evolution of parent-of-origin-specific gene effects - such as 'genomic imprinting' - and associated maladaptation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲属选择是人类手性的调节器:性别特异性、父母和原生父母的影响。
全世界人类左撇子的比例约为 10%,男性略高于女性。双胞胎和家族研究估计,人类左撇子的遗传率约为 25%。有人认为,左撇子出现频率低但数量可观,这意味着与频率有关的负面选择,例如,左撇子在与习惯于与右撇子作战的对手作战时具有 "出其不意 "的优势。由于这种博弈论假说涉及社会互动,因此我们在此基于亲属选择对惯用手的进化进行分析,据了解,亲属选择在一般社会行为的进化中发挥着重要作用。我们证明(1)亲缘关系会调节右手与左手的平衡,这取决于左手是否具有边际自私性与边际利他性;(2)与社会伙伴的亲缘关系中的性别差异可能会驱动手性的性别差异;(3)父母与后代的不同亲缘关系可能会产生父母与后代的冲突和性冲突,从而导致与手性有关的母系和父系遗传效应的进化;以及(4)母系起源基因与父系起源基因的不同亲缘关系可能会产生与手性有关的母系和父系遗传效应。(4) 母源基因与父源基因的不同亲缘关系可能会产生基因组内冲突,从而导致父源特异性基因效应(如 "基因组印记")的进化以及相关的适应不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coevolution of norm psychology and cooperation through exapted conformity. Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing the expensive-tissue hypothesis' prediction of inter-tissue competition using causal modelling with latent variables. Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects. The role of mating effort and co-residence history in step-grandparental investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1