MRI-based Quantitative Collateral Assessment in Acute Stroke : A Comparison with Single-phase CTA in Drip-and-ship Patients with Serial Imaging.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s00062-024-01456-6
Christoph Polkowski, Niklas Helwig, Marlies Wagner, Alexander Seiler
{"title":"MRI-based Quantitative Collateral Assessment in Acute Stroke : A Comparison with Single-phase CTA in Drip-and-ship Patients with Serial Imaging.","authors":"Christoph Polkowski, Niklas Helwig, Marlies Wagner, Alexander Seiler","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01456-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), collateral assessment with single-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) might underestimate pial collateral supply in a considerable proportion of patients. We aimed to compare time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantitative collateral mapping to conventional collateral imaging with CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study covering a period of 6 years (2012-2018) included drip-and-ship LVO patients who underwent MR imaging after initial imaging evaluation with CT. For MRI-based collateral assessment, T2*-weighted time series from perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) were processed to compute a quantitative collateral vessel index (CVI<sub>PWI</sub>) based on the magnitude of signal variance across the entire acquisition time. CTA-based collateral scores (Tan and Maas) and CVI<sub>PWI</sub> were investigated in terms of inter-modality associations between collateral measures, as well as their relationships with stroke severity, infarct volume and early functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included n = 56 patients (n = 31 female, mean age 69.9 ± 14.21 years). No significant relationship was found between MR-based quantitative collateral supply (CVI<sub>PWI</sub>) and CT-based collateral scores (r = -0.00057, p = 0.502 and r = -0.124, p = 0.797). In contrast to CVI<sub>PWI</sub>, CTA-based collateral scores showed no significant relationship with clinical stroke severity and infarct volume. While MR-based CVI<sub>PWI</sub> was independently associated with favorable early functional outcome in multivariate analysis (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.001-1.153, p = 0.046), CTA-based collateral scores were not significantly associated with outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since collateral scores based on single-phase CTA do not accurately reflect infarct progression and might underestimate pial collateralization in a relevant proportion of patients, they are not associated with early functional outcome in LVO patients. In contrast, CVI<sub>PWI</sub> represents a robust imaging parameter of collateral supply and is independently associated with functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01456-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), collateral assessment with single-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) might underestimate pial collateral supply in a considerable proportion of patients. We aimed to compare time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based quantitative collateral mapping to conventional collateral imaging with CTA.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study covering a period of 6 years (2012-2018) included drip-and-ship LVO patients who underwent MR imaging after initial imaging evaluation with CT. For MRI-based collateral assessment, T2*-weighted time series from perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) were processed to compute a quantitative collateral vessel index (CVIPWI) based on the magnitude of signal variance across the entire acquisition time. CTA-based collateral scores (Tan and Maas) and CVIPWI were investigated in terms of inter-modality associations between collateral measures, as well as their relationships with stroke severity, infarct volume and early functional outcome.

Results: The final analysis included n = 56 patients (n = 31 female, mean age 69.9 ± 14.21 years). No significant relationship was found between MR-based quantitative collateral supply (CVIPWI) and CT-based collateral scores (r = -0.00057, p = 0.502 and r = -0.124, p = 0.797). In contrast to CVIPWI, CTA-based collateral scores showed no significant relationship with clinical stroke severity and infarct volume. While MR-based CVIPWI was independently associated with favorable early functional outcome in multivariate analysis (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.001-1.153, p = 0.046), CTA-based collateral scores were not significantly associated with outcome.

Conclusions: Since collateral scores based on single-phase CTA do not accurately reflect infarct progression and might underestimate pial collateralization in a relevant proportion of patients, they are not associated with early functional outcome in LVO patients. In contrast, CVIPWI represents a robust imaging parameter of collateral supply and is independently associated with functional outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于磁共振成像的急性脑卒中侧支定量评估 :与单相 CTA 在滴注和船运患者中的连续成像比较。
目的:在大血管闭塞(LVO)的急性缺血性卒中中,单相计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)的侧支评估可能会低估相当一部分患者的髓侧支供应。我们的目的是将基于时间分辨磁共振成像(MRI)的定量侧支图谱与传统的 CTA 侧支成像进行比较:这项为期 6 年(2012-2018 年)的回顾性单中心研究纳入了滴水穿石型 LVO 患者,他们在使用 CT 进行初步成像评估后接受了 MR 成像。在基于 MRI 的侧支评估中,对灌注加权成像(PWI)的 T2* 加权时间序列进行处理,根据整个采集时间内的信号方差大小计算出定量侧支血管指数(CVIPWI)。研究了基于 CTA 的侧支评分(Tan 和 Maas)和 CVIPWI 在侧支测量之间的跨模态关联,以及它们与中风严重程度、梗死体积和早期功能预后的关系:最终分析包括 n = 56 名患者(n = 31 名女性,平均年龄为 69.9 ± 14.21 岁)。基于 MR 的定量侧支供应(CVIPWI)和基于 CT 的侧支评分之间没有发现明显的关系(r = -0.00057,p = 0.502 和 r = -0.124,p = 0.797)。与 CVIPWI 相反,基于 CTA 的侧支评分与临床卒中严重程度和梗死体积无明显关系。在多变量分析中,基于 MR 的 CVIPWI 与良好的早期功能预后独立相关(OR 1.075,95% CI 1.001-1.153,p = 0.046),而基于 CTA 的侧支评分与预后无明显关系:结论:由于基于单相 CTA 的侧支评分不能准确反映梗死的进展情况,而且可能低估了相当一部分患者的静脉侧支,因此它们与 LVO 患者的早期功能预后无关。相比之下,CVIPWI代表了侧支供应的可靠成像参数,并且与功能预后独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
期刊最新文献
Epstein-Barr Virus Encephalitis Mimicking Herpes Encephalitis On Neuroimaging: A Case Report. Non-Stenotic Carotid Plaques and Rate of DWI-positive MRI in Patients with Lower-Risk Transient or Persistent Minor Neurologic Events: DOUBT Sub Study. Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign as a Predictor of First-Pass Recanalization and Favorable Outcomes in Direct Thrombectomy Patients. Microstructural Characteristics of Cervical Spinal Cord Using High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) and Tractography in Healthy Subjects. Long and Large Stentrievers Improve Reperfusion Outcomes in Acute Intracranial Terminal Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Interim Results of the Rossetti Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1