COVID-19-induced changes in the workplace, psychosocial work environment and employee well-being: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Occupational Medicine-Oxford Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqae079
J Kausto, J Airaksinen, T Oksanen, J Vahtera, M Kivimäki, J Ervasti
{"title":"COVID-19-induced changes in the workplace, psychosocial work environment and employee well-being: a longitudinal study.","authors":"J Kausto, J Airaksinen, T Oksanen, J Vahtera, M Kivimäki, J Ervasti","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many workplaces, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic changed work arrangements, but there is scarce longitudinal evidence on whether psychosocial work environment and employee well-being were affected.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the psychosocial work environment and employee well-being before, during and after the pandemic in relation to pandemic-induced changes (working from home, change to other tasks and team reorganization).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey data from a cohort of 20 944 public sector employees in Finland were collected before (2016-2018), during (2020) and after the pandemic (2022). Multilevel linear and logistic regression was used to examine group differences between the before-during and during-after periods of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Working from home was associated with a small but favourable change in worktime control, organizational justice and social capital (scale 1-5) during the pandemic and after the pandemic (marginal mean difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.09 with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] from 0.01 to 0.10). There was a post-pandemic increase in work time control, even among participants with a transfer into other tasks (0.11, 95% CI 0.07, 0.14) or team reorganization (0.06, 95% CI 0.02, 0.10). The decline in self-rated work ability (scale 0-10) before and during the pandemic was greater in those transferred into other tasks (-0.10, 95% CI -0.13, -0.06) than in those not (-0.05, 95% CI -0.06, -0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working from home during the pandemic was accompanied by small favourable changes in the psychosocial work environment during the pandemic, whereas transition to different tasks was associated with a decline in self-rated work ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54696,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","volume":" ","pages":"571-580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Medicine-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In many workplaces, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic changed work arrangements, but there is scarce longitudinal evidence on whether psychosocial work environment and employee well-being were affected.

Aims: To examine the psychosocial work environment and employee well-being before, during and after the pandemic in relation to pandemic-induced changes (working from home, change to other tasks and team reorganization).

Methods: Survey data from a cohort of 20 944 public sector employees in Finland were collected before (2016-2018), during (2020) and after the pandemic (2022). Multilevel linear and logistic regression was used to examine group differences between the before-during and during-after periods of the pandemic.

Results: Working from home was associated with a small but favourable change in worktime control, organizational justice and social capital (scale 1-5) during the pandemic and after the pandemic (marginal mean difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.09 with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] from 0.01 to 0.10). There was a post-pandemic increase in work time control, even among participants with a transfer into other tasks (0.11, 95% CI 0.07, 0.14) or team reorganization (0.06, 95% CI 0.02, 0.10). The decline in self-rated work ability (scale 0-10) before and during the pandemic was greater in those transferred into other tasks (-0.10, 95% CI -0.13, -0.06) than in those not (-0.05, 95% CI -0.06, -0.04).

Conclusions: Working from home during the pandemic was accompanied by small favourable changes in the psychosocial work environment during the pandemic, whereas transition to different tasks was associated with a decline in self-rated work ability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 引发的工作场所、社会心理工作环境和员工幸福感的变化:一项纵向研究。
背景:在许多工作场所,2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行改变了工作安排,但关于社会心理工作环境和员工幸福感是否受到影响的纵向证据却很少。目的:研究大流行之前、期间和之后与大流行引起的变化(在家工作、改做其他工作和团队重组)相关的社会心理工作环境和员工幸福感:方法:在大流行之前(2016-2018 年)、期间(2020 年)和之后(2022 年)收集了 20 944 名芬兰公共部门雇员的调查数据。采用多层次线性回归和逻辑回归来研究大流行前-大流行期间和大流行期间-大流行后的群体差异:在大流行期间和大流行之后,在家工作与工作时间控制、组织公正和社会资本(1-5 级)方面的微小但有利的变化有关(边际平均差异从 0.02 到 0.09 不等,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 0.01 到 0.10)。大流行后,工作时间控制能力有所提高,即使是在转任其他任务(0.11,95% CI 0.07,0.14)或团队重组(0.06,95% CI 0.02,0.10)的参与者中也是如此。在大流行前和大流行期间,被调往其他工作的人员的自我评价工作能力(0-10分)下降幅度(-0.10,95% CI -0.13,-0.06)大于未被调往其他工作的人员(-0.05,95% CI -0.06,-0.04):大流行期间在家工作伴随着大流行期间社会心理学工作环境的微小有利变化,而转换到不同任务则与自我评价工作能力的下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Occupational Medicine-Oxford
Occupational Medicine-Oxford 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
120
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Medicine is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides vital information for the promotion of workplace health and safety. The key strategic aims of the journal are to improve the practice of occupational health professionals through continuing education and to raise the profile of occupational health with key stakeholders including policy makers and representatives of employers and employees. Topics covered include work-related injury and illness, accident and illness prevention, health promotion, occupational disease, health education, the establishment and implementation of health and safety standards, monitoring of the work environment, and the management of recognized hazards. Contributions are welcomed from practising occupational health professionals and research workers in related fields.
期刊最新文献
Exploring psychological impact of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Evolution of stressors for healthcare workers over the COVID-19 pandemic. Job-exposure matrix (JEM) validity on crystalline silica among systemic sclerosis patients. Doctors with mental health difficulties and ADHD. Lymph node silicosis and recurrent tuberculosis in a short service goldminer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1