Exploring Consumer Experiences of Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Rehabilitation That Meets Their Needs: The Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 2—Consumer Perspectives

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/hex.70035
Gillian Mason, Karen Ribbons, Lucy Bailey, Adrian O'Malley, Tracy Ward, Stephen Ward, Michael Pollack, Frederick R. Walker, Michael Nilsson, Nicolette Hodyl
{"title":"Exploring Consumer Experiences of Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Rehabilitation That Meets Their Needs: The Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 2—Consumer Perspectives","authors":"Gillian Mason,&nbsp;Karen Ribbons,&nbsp;Lucy Bailey,&nbsp;Adrian O'Malley,&nbsp;Tracy Ward,&nbsp;Stephen Ward,&nbsp;Michael Pollack,&nbsp;Frederick R. Walker,&nbsp;Michael Nilsson,&nbsp;Nicolette Hodyl","doi":"10.1111/hex.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Improved access to rehabilitation is highlighted as a key pathway to achieving the World Health Organisation's (WHO) goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all (Sustainable Development Goal 3). This article is the second in a two-part series outlining the findings from the <i>Rehabilitation Choices</i> study, which aimed to identify how health professionals and consumers in Australia are informed to make decisions about rehabilitation, and their experience with barriers and enablers to accessing that rehabilitation. In this study, we present the perspectives of consumers with different health conditions and a range of experiences with rehabilitation services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. People with self-reported lived experience of rehabilitation and carers were recruited using maximum variation sampling. Thematic analysis of data was conducted using an inductive approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-six consumers with diverse lived experiences of rehabilitation (19–80 years, 49 patients, 7 carers) participated in focus groups and interviews to discuss how they sourced information about rehabilitation and their experiences of what made it hard or easy to access rehabilitative care to meet their needs. Four themes were produced from the data: (1) service-centricity of options limits access, (2) access is the patient's responsibility, (3) enabling decision-making about rehabilitation with appropriate information and (4) provision of a psychologically safe environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Any planned (re)design of services to improve consumer access to rehabilitation should consider the themes identified in this study. This will ensure that consumers are provided with rehabilitation options that suit their holistic and unique needs beyond consideration of their medical diagnoses, and are actively supported to navigate this access, provided with information to help them make informed choices and provided a psychologically safe environment to engage effectively with rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Three consumer research partners with lived experience of rehabilitation as patients or carers were core team members. They were involved in the design and implementation of the recruitment and communications strategies, design of the interview approach and discussion guide, contributed to the interpretation and contextualisation of findings and writing of this manuscript and are included as co-authors (A. O., T. W. and S. W.).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Improved access to rehabilitation is highlighted as a key pathway to achieving the World Health Organisation's (WHO) goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all (Sustainable Development Goal 3). This article is the second in a two-part series outlining the findings from the Rehabilitation Choices study, which aimed to identify how health professionals and consumers in Australia are informed to make decisions about rehabilitation, and their experience with barriers and enablers to accessing that rehabilitation. In this study, we present the perspectives of consumers with different health conditions and a range of experiences with rehabilitation services.

Methods

This was a qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. People with self-reported lived experience of rehabilitation and carers were recruited using maximum variation sampling. Thematic analysis of data was conducted using an inductive approach.

Results

Fifty-six consumers with diverse lived experiences of rehabilitation (19–80 years, 49 patients, 7 carers) participated in focus groups and interviews to discuss how they sourced information about rehabilitation and their experiences of what made it hard or easy to access rehabilitative care to meet their needs. Four themes were produced from the data: (1) service-centricity of options limits access, (2) access is the patient's responsibility, (3) enabling decision-making about rehabilitation with appropriate information and (4) provision of a psychologically safe environment.

Conclusions

Any planned (re)design of services to improve consumer access to rehabilitation should consider the themes identified in this study. This will ensure that consumers are provided with rehabilitation options that suit their holistic and unique needs beyond consideration of their medical diagnoses, and are actively supported to navigate this access, provided with information to help them make informed choices and provided a psychologically safe environment to engage effectively with rehabilitation.

Patient or Public Contribution

Three consumer research partners with lived experience of rehabilitation as patients or carers were core team members. They were involved in the design and implementation of the recruitment and communications strategies, design of the interview approach and discussion guide, contributed to the interpretation and contextualisation of findings and writing of this manuscript and are included as co-authors (A. O., T. W. and S. W.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索消费者在获得符合其需求的康复服务时遇到的障碍和有利因素:康复选择研究,第 2 部分--消费者视角。
导言:世界卫生组织(WHO)提出了 "确保人人享有健康生活并促进其福祉 "的目标(可持续发展目标 3),并强调改善康复服务是实现这一目标的关键途径。本文是概述 "康复选择 "研究结果的两部分系列文章中的第二篇,该研究旨在确定澳大利亚的医疗专业人员和消费者如何在知情的情况下做出有关康复的决定,以及他们在获得康复的障碍和促进因素方面的经验。在这项研究中,我们介绍了不同健康状况的消费者的观点以及他们在康复服务方面的各种经验:这是一项采用焦点小组和半结构化访谈的定性研究。采用最大变异抽样法招募了自述有康复生活经历的人和照顾者。采用归纳法对数据进行主题分析:56名具有不同康复生活经历的消费者(19-80岁,49名患者,7名护理者)参加了焦点小组和访谈,讨论了他们如何获得康复信息,以及他们在获得康复护理以满足其需求时遇到的困难和困难。从数据中得出了四个主题:(1)以服务为中心的选择限制了患者获得康复护理的机会;(2)获得康复护理是患者的责任;(3)通过适当的信息帮助患者做出康复决策;(4)提供心理安全的环境:任何旨在改善消费者获得康复服务的计划(重新)设计都应考虑本研究中确定的主题。这将确保为消费者提供适合其整体和独特需求的康复选择,而不只是考虑他们的医疗诊断,并积极支持他们获得这种机会,为他们提供信息以帮助他们做出明智的选择,并为他们提供心理安全的环境以有效地参与康复:患者或公众的贡献:团队的核心成员中有三位消费者研究伙伴,他们作为患者或护理者,拥有康复方面的实际经验。他们参与了招募和沟通策略的设计和实施、访谈方法和讨论指南的设计,对研究结果的解释和背景分析以及本手稿的撰写做出了贡献,并被列为共同作者(A. O., T. W. 和 S. W. )。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1