Automated Insulin Delivery for Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated A1c.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400185
Alisa Boucsein, Yongwen Zhou, Venus Michaels, Jillian J Haszard, Craig Jefferies, Esko Wiltshire, Ryan G Paul, Amber Parry-Strong, Maheen Pasha, Goran Petrovski, Martin I de Bock, Benjamin J Wheeler
{"title":"Automated Insulin Delivery for Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated A1c.","authors":"Alisa Boucsein, Yongwen Zhou, Venus Michaels, Jillian J Haszard, Craig Jefferies, Esko Wiltshire, Ryan G Paul, Amber Parry-Strong, Maheen Pasha, Goran Petrovski, Martin I de Bock, Benjamin J Wheeler","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated insulin delivery is the treatment of choice in adults with type 1 diabetes. Data are needed on the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery for children and youth with diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 1 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio either to use an automated insulin delivery system (MiniMed 780G) or to receive usual diabetes care of multiple daily injections or non--automated pump therapy (control). The patients were children and youth (defined as 7 to 25 years of age) with elevated glycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥8.5% with no upper limit). The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin at 13 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients underwent randomization (37 to automated insulin delivery and 43 to control) and all patients completed the trial. At 13 weeks, the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin decreased from 10.5±1.9% to 8.1±1.8% in the automated insulin delivery group but remained relatively consistent in the control group, changing from 10.4±1.6% to 10.6±1.8% (baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -2.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to -1.8; P<0.001). Patients in the automated insulin delivery group spent on average 8.4 hours more in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dl than those in the control group. One severe hypoglycemia event and two diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred in the control group, with no such events in the automated insulin delivery group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial of 80 children and youth with elevated glycated hemoglobin, automated insulin delivery significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin compared with usual diabetes care, without resulting in severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events. (Funded by Lions Clubs New Zealand District 202F and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12622001454763.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"3 10","pages":"EVIDoa2400185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated insulin delivery is the treatment of choice in adults with type 1 diabetes. Data are needed on the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery for children and youth with diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 1 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio either to use an automated insulin delivery system (MiniMed 780G) or to receive usual diabetes care of multiple daily injections or non--automated pump therapy (control). The patients were children and youth (defined as 7 to 25 years of age) with elevated glycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥8.5% with no upper limit). The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin at 13 weeks.

Results: A total of 80 patients underwent randomization (37 to automated insulin delivery and 43 to control) and all patients completed the trial. At 13 weeks, the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin decreased from 10.5±1.9% to 8.1±1.8% in the automated insulin delivery group but remained relatively consistent in the control group, changing from 10.4±1.6% to 10.6±1.8% (baseline-adjusted between-group difference, -2.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to -1.8; P<0.001). Patients in the automated insulin delivery group spent on average 8.4 hours more in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dl than those in the control group. One severe hypoglycemia event and two diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred in the control group, with no such events in the automated insulin delivery group.

Conclusions: In this trial of 80 children and youth with elevated glycated hemoglobin, automated insulin delivery significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin compared with usual diabetes care, without resulting in severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events. (Funded by Lions Clubs New Zealand District 202F and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12622001454763.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为患有 1 型糖尿病和 A1c 升高的年轻人自动输送胰岛素。
背景:胰岛素自动给药是成人 1 型糖尿病患者的首选治疗方法。对于患有糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白水平升高的儿童和青少年,自动胰岛素输送的有效性和安全性还需要数据支持:在这项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验中,我们按 1:1 的比例分配 1 型糖尿病患者使用胰岛素自动给药系统(MiniMed 780G),或接受每日多次注射的常规糖尿病护理或非自动泵疗法(对照组)。患者为血糖升高(糖化血红蛋白≥8.5%,无上限)的儿童和青少年(定义为 7-25 岁)。主要结果是13周时糖化血红蛋白的基线调整组间差异:共有 80 名患者接受了随机分组(37 人接受胰岛素自动给药,43 人接受对照组),所有患者均完成了试验。13周时,胰岛素自动给药组的糖化血红蛋白平均值(±SD)从10.5±1.9%降至8.1±1.8%,而对照组则保持相对稳定,从10.4±1.6%降至10.6±1.8%(基线调整后的组间差异,-2.5个百分点;95%置信区间[CI],-3.1至-1.8;PC结论:在这项对 80 名糖化血红蛋白升高的儿童和青少年进行的试验中,与常规糖尿病护理相比,自动胰岛素输送可显著降低糖化血红蛋白,但不会导致严重的低血糖或糖尿病酮症酸中毒事件。(由新西兰狮子会 202F 区及其他机构资助;澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册号 ACTRN12622001454763)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1