Expanding Policy and Programming to Address Conversion Therapy and 2SLGBTQ+ Health Inequity: A Discussion of Challenges.

David J Kinitz, Nguyen K Tran, Kinnon R MacKinnon
{"title":"Expanding Policy and Programming to Address Conversion Therapy and 2SLGBTQ+ Health Inequity: A Discussion of Challenges.","authors":"David J Kinitz, Nguyen K Tran, Kinnon R MacKinnon","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2024.27386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advocates and researchers have made myriad recommendations to guide policy actors in stopping conversion therapy. This commentary extends these recommendations by identifying core challenges that policy actors face with interventions that solely focus on conversion therapy. Conversion therapy exists because of pervasive social values and beliefs that devalue, erase and stigmatize Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other sexual and gender minority (2SLGBTQ+) people, in turn, creating a supply and demand market. That is, those who espouse oppressive values enable and supply conversion therapy for the demand of 2SLGBTQ+ people struggling against these values and those who influence their lives (e.g., guardians). The discussion underscores why policy actors must disrupt the cisheteronormative bedrock that sustains conversion therapy. It is imperative for policy actors to expand policies and programming beyond conversion therapy using an intersectional framework that considers colonialism, racism and cisheterosexism. Interventions must encompass all systems (e.g., health, legal, social, economic) that shape 2SLGBTQ+ people's lives to disrupt the market of conversion therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101342,"journal":{"name":"HealthcarePapers","volume":"22 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthcarePapers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2024.27386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advocates and researchers have made myriad recommendations to guide policy actors in stopping conversion therapy. This commentary extends these recommendations by identifying core challenges that policy actors face with interventions that solely focus on conversion therapy. Conversion therapy exists because of pervasive social values and beliefs that devalue, erase and stigmatize Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and other sexual and gender minority (2SLGBTQ+) people, in turn, creating a supply and demand market. That is, those who espouse oppressive values enable and supply conversion therapy for the demand of 2SLGBTQ+ people struggling against these values and those who influence their lives (e.g., guardians). The discussion underscores why policy actors must disrupt the cisheteronormative bedrock that sustains conversion therapy. It is imperative for policy actors to expand policies and programming beyond conversion therapy using an intersectional framework that considers colonialism, racism and cisheterosexism. Interventions must encompass all systems (e.g., health, legal, social, economic) that shape 2SLGBTQ+ people's lives to disrupt the market of conversion therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展政策和计划,解决转化疗法和 2SLGBTQ+ 健康不平等问题:挑战讨论。
倡导者和研究人员提出了无数建议,以指导政策制定者制止转化疗法。本评论对这些建议进行了延伸,指出了政策制定者在仅针对转化疗法进行干预时所面临的核心挑战。转化疗法之所以存在,是因为普遍存在的社会价值观和信仰贬低、抹杀和鄙视双灵人、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者和其他性与性别少数群体(2SLGBTQ+),进而形成了一个供需市场。也就是说,那些拥护压迫性价值观的人支持并提供转化疗法,以满足那些与这些价值观作斗争的 2SLGBTQ+ 人以及那些影响他们生活的人(如监护人)的需求。讨论强调了为什么政策制定者必须打破支撑转化疗法的顺异性恋规范基石。政策制定者必须利用考虑殖民主义、种族主义和雌雄同体主义的跨部门框架,将政策和计划扩展到转化疗法之外。干预措施必须涵盖影响 2SLGBTQ+ 生活的所有系统(如卫生、法律、社会、经济),以扰乱转换疗法的市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Crisis: Transforming Health Systems Through Community Engagement. Creating a Sustaining Culture for Patient Engagement. First Peoples Wellness Circle and the Indigenous Mental Wellness and Trauma-Informed Specialist Workforce During COVID-19. Meaningful Engagement or Co-Production, or Both? Nurturing Engagement-Capable Environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1