Can an animal welfare risk assessment tool identify livestock at risk of poor welfare outcomes?

Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/awf.2024.28
Natarsha Williams, Sarah Chaplin, Lauren Hemsworth, Richard Shephard, Andrew Fisher
{"title":"Can an animal welfare risk assessment tool identify livestock at risk of poor welfare outcomes?","authors":"Natarsha Williams, Sarah Chaplin, Lauren Hemsworth, Richard Shephard, Andrew Fisher","doi":"10.1017/awf.2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If livestock at risk of poor welfare could be identified using a risk assessment tool, more targeted response strategies could be developed by enforcement agencies to facilitate early intervention, prompt welfare improvement and a decrease in reoffending. This study aimed to test the ability of an Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Tool (AWRAT) to identify livestock at risk of poor welfare in extensive farming systems in Australia. Following farm visits for welfare- and non-welfare-related reasons, participants completed a single welfare rating (WR) and an assessment using the AWRAT for the farm just visited. A novel algorithm was developed to generate an AWRAT-Risk Rating (AWRAT-RR) based on the AWRAT assessment. Using linear regression, the relationship between the AWRAT-RR and the WR was tested. The AWRAT was good at identifying farms with poor livestock welfare based on this preliminary testing. As the AWRAT relies upon observation, the intra- and inter-observer agreement were compared in an observation study. This included rating a set of photographs of farm features, on two occasions. Intra-observer reliability was good, with 83% of Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for observers ≥ 0.8. Inter-observer reliability was moderate with an ICC of 0.67. The AWRAT provides a structured framework to improve consistency in livestock welfare assessments. Further research is necessary to determine the AWRAT's ability to identify livestock at risk of poor welfare by studying animal welfare incidents and reoffending over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":520228,"journal":{"name":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2024.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If livestock at risk of poor welfare could be identified using a risk assessment tool, more targeted response strategies could be developed by enforcement agencies to facilitate early intervention, prompt welfare improvement and a decrease in reoffending. This study aimed to test the ability of an Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Tool (AWRAT) to identify livestock at risk of poor welfare in extensive farming systems in Australia. Following farm visits for welfare- and non-welfare-related reasons, participants completed a single welfare rating (WR) and an assessment using the AWRAT for the farm just visited. A novel algorithm was developed to generate an AWRAT-Risk Rating (AWRAT-RR) based on the AWRAT assessment. Using linear regression, the relationship between the AWRAT-RR and the WR was tested. The AWRAT was good at identifying farms with poor livestock welfare based on this preliminary testing. As the AWRAT relies upon observation, the intra- and inter-observer agreement were compared in an observation study. This included rating a set of photographs of farm features, on two occasions. Intra-observer reliability was good, with 83% of Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) for observers ≥ 0.8. Inter-observer reliability was moderate with an ICC of 0.67. The AWRAT provides a structured framework to improve consistency in livestock welfare assessments. Further research is necessary to determine the AWRAT's ability to identify livestock at risk of poor welfare by studying animal welfare incidents and reoffending over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动物福利风险评估工具能否识别面临不良福利后果风险的牲畜?
如果能够使用风险评估工具识别出面临低福利风险的牲畜,执法机构就能制定出更有针对性的应对策略,以促进早期干预、及时改善福利并减少再犯。本研究旨在测试动物福利风险评估工具(AWRAT)识别澳大利亚粗放型养殖系统中面临低福利风险的牲畜的能力。在因福利和非福利相关原因访问农场后,参与者使用 AWRAT 对刚访问过的农场进行单一福利评级 (WR) 和评估。在 AWRAT 评估的基础上,开发了一种新算法来生成 AWRAT 风险评级 (AWRAT-RR)。使用线性回归法测试了 AWRAT-RR 与 WR 之间的关系。根据初步测试,AWRAT 能够很好地识别牲畜福利较差的农场。由于 AWRAT 依赖于观察,因此在一项观察研究中对观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性进行了比较。这包括两次对一组农场特征照片进行评分。观察者内部的可靠性较好,83% 的观察者类内相关系数 (ICC) ≥ 0.8。观察者之间的可靠性适中,ICC 为 0.67。AWRAT 为提高牲畜福利评估的一致性提供了一个结构化框架。有必要开展进一步的研究,通过研究动物福利事件和随着时间推移的再犯罪情况,确定 AWRAT 识别面临不良福利风险的牲畜的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Between animal research and animal welfare: Analysing the openness practices of UK Named Veterinary Surgeons. Conceptual foundations for a clarified meaning of the 3Rs principles in animal experimentation. A comparison of the welfare of free-ranging native pony herds on common land with those used for conservation grazing in the UK. Can an animal welfare risk assessment tool identify livestock at risk of poor welfare outcomes? Neutralisation techniques used by defendants charged with animal welfare offences in Finland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1