A bi-level multi-objective optimization approach for carbon policy formulation towards food waste resource treatment from environmental, energy and economic perspectives

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100310
Yawen Deng , Yaqi Wang , Mingliang Tan , Liying Liu
{"title":"A bi-level multi-objective optimization approach for carbon policy formulation towards food waste resource treatment from environmental, energy and economic perspectives","authors":"Yawen Deng ,&nbsp;Yaqi Wang ,&nbsp;Mingliang Tan ,&nbsp;Liying Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Excessive food waste contributes to the greenhouse effect. Although low-carbon technology has the potential to reduce carbon emissions and generate renewable energy, the high costs may deter the adoption. To promote low-carbon food waste treatment, local authorities could develop carbon reduction policies targeted at the food waste treatment industry, which could lead to a game between local authorities and food waste treatment enterprises. Hence, a bi-level multi-objective optimization model is put forward to balance the decisions of local authorities and those of food waste treatment enterprises. Enterprises can choose which carbon reduction policies to implement, and local authorities determine the intensity of specific policies. After testing this model on Shenzhen’s food waste treatment system, the model’s validity and feasibility were confirmed. It was discovered that by identifying suitable carbon reduction policies, the model can help enterprises achieve more than 50 % carbon reduction. Moreover, different enterprises may choose different carbon reduction policies to implement. Optimal food waste disposal arrangements need flexible adjustments. The constructed model can serve as a decision-making tool for city managers to reduce carbon emissions in food waste treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882400159X/pdfft?md5=4d9af55b55a169f6b296787b4a10fa30&pid=1-s2.0-S266618882400159X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882400159X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive food waste contributes to the greenhouse effect. Although low-carbon technology has the potential to reduce carbon emissions and generate renewable energy, the high costs may deter the adoption. To promote low-carbon food waste treatment, local authorities could develop carbon reduction policies targeted at the food waste treatment industry, which could lead to a game between local authorities and food waste treatment enterprises. Hence, a bi-level multi-objective optimization model is put forward to balance the decisions of local authorities and those of food waste treatment enterprises. Enterprises can choose which carbon reduction policies to implement, and local authorities determine the intensity of specific policies. After testing this model on Shenzhen’s food waste treatment system, the model’s validity and feasibility were confirmed. It was discovered that by identifying suitable carbon reduction policies, the model can help enterprises achieve more than 50 % carbon reduction. Moreover, different enterprises may choose different carbon reduction policies to implement. Optimal food waste disposal arrangements need flexible adjustments. The constructed model can serve as a decision-making tool for city managers to reduce carbon emissions in food waste treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从环境、能源和经济角度制定餐厨垃圾资源化碳政策的双层多目标优化方法
过多的食物浪费会加剧温室效应。虽然低碳技术具有减少碳排放和产生可再生能源的潜力,但高昂的成本可能阻碍其采用。为了促进低碳厨余处理,地方政府可以制定针对厨余处理行业的碳减排政策,这可能会导致地方政府与厨余处理企业之间的博弈。因此,本文提出了一个双层多目标优化模型,以平衡地方政府和餐厨垃圾处理企业的决策。企业可以选择实施哪些碳减排政策,而地方政府则决定具体政策的力度。在对深圳市餐厨垃圾处理系统进行测试后,证实了该模型的有效性和可行性。研究发现,通过确定合适的碳减排政策,该模型可以帮助企业实现 50% 以上的碳减排量。此外,不同企业可选择不同的减碳政策。最佳厨余处理安排需要灵活调整。所构建的模型可作为城市管理者在餐厨垃圾处理过程中减少碳排放的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Decommissioning of a fuel oil-fired thermoelectric power plant in Brazil - Economic feasibility under certain and risk conditions Environmental regulation, R&D subsidies, and industrial green total factor productivity Utilising machine learning for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) evaluation: Transitioning from committees to climate Spatial inequality in sub-national human development index: A case study of West Bengal districts Public participation in Governance of E-waste recycling: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1