Zhen Wang , Maximilian Mann , Jessica L. Hamilton , Jeremy L. Wykes , Andrew J. Frierdich
{"title":"Comparison between Co(II) and Ni(II) cycling at goethite-water interfaces: Interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization","authors":"Zhen Wang , Maximilian Mann , Jessica L. Hamilton , Jeremy L. Wykes , Andrew J. Frierdich","doi":"10.1016/j.gca.2024.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) are critical metals for modern renewable energy technologies as well as essential micronutrients for terrestrial plant health and marine primary production. Both metals are commonly surface-adsorbed onto and/or structurally-incorporated into iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals, such as goethite (α-FeOOH), that are ubiquitously present in soils and sediments at the Earth’s surface. In sub- and anoxic environments, aqueous ferrous iron (Fe(II)) generated from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction can induce the recrystallization of goethite and subsequently influences the speciation and mobilization of associated metals, e.g., Co(III) being reduced to Co(II). While it is generally considered that divalent Co and Ni behave similarly at goethite-water interfaces, there lacks a direct comparison of their cycling through goethite in response to Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. Here, under circumneutral anoxic conditions with and without addition of aqueous Fe(II), we performed batch reaction experiments on Co(II)-substituted goethite and Co(II) and Ni(II) sorption experiments on pure goethite. The redox state and coordination environment of Co associated with goethite were determined using high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Co K-edge, and the distribution of solid-bound Co and Ni in goethite following sorption was revealed by sequential dissolution. Our results show that substitution of Co(II) for Fe(III) in goethite has less negative feedback on Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization than Ni(II), which may be related to their differing structural distortions as evidenced by EXAFS. In the absence of Fe(II), aqueous Co(II) is more favourably adsorbed onto and incorporated deeper into goethite than Ni(II), suggesting that Co(II) is more structurally compatible with goethite. The presence of Fe(II) markedly enhances the structural incorporation of both Co(II) and Ni(II) as a result of goethite recrystallization, which in turn can be inhibited by the accumulation of metals at the mineral surface. Furthermore, structurally-incorporated Co(II) is more difficult to be released back into solution (i.e. sum of aqueous and extract fractions) than Ni(II) during Fe(II)-catalyzed goethite recrystallization. Overall, our work highlights the significant differences between Co(II) and Ni(II) in their cycling at goethite-water interfaces and intricate interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. This improves our understanding of their mobilization and distribution in anoxic goethite-rich systems and can provide useful insights for their enrichment and extraction from natural and artificial laterites generated from the enhanced weathering of ultramafic mine tailings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":327,"journal":{"name":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","volume":"384 ","pages":"Pages 128-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703724004940/pdfft?md5=1135460db4a328bd0e30de7e3caccd6d&pid=1-s2.0-S0016703724004940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703724004940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni) are critical metals for modern renewable energy technologies as well as essential micronutrients for terrestrial plant health and marine primary production. Both metals are commonly surface-adsorbed onto and/or structurally-incorporated into iron (oxyhydr)oxide minerals, such as goethite (α-FeOOH), that are ubiquitously present in soils and sediments at the Earth’s surface. In sub- and anoxic environments, aqueous ferrous iron (Fe(II)) generated from dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction can induce the recrystallization of goethite and subsequently influences the speciation and mobilization of associated metals, e.g., Co(III) being reduced to Co(II). While it is generally considered that divalent Co and Ni behave similarly at goethite-water interfaces, there lacks a direct comparison of their cycling through goethite in response to Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. Here, under circumneutral anoxic conditions with and without addition of aqueous Fe(II), we performed batch reaction experiments on Co(II)-substituted goethite and Co(II) and Ni(II) sorption experiments on pure goethite. The redox state and coordination environment of Co associated with goethite were determined using high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Co K-edge, and the distribution of solid-bound Co and Ni in goethite following sorption was revealed by sequential dissolution. Our results show that substitution of Co(II) for Fe(III) in goethite has less negative feedback on Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization than Ni(II), which may be related to their differing structural distortions as evidenced by EXAFS. In the absence of Fe(II), aqueous Co(II) is more favourably adsorbed onto and incorporated deeper into goethite than Ni(II), suggesting that Co(II) is more structurally compatible with goethite. The presence of Fe(II) markedly enhances the structural incorporation of both Co(II) and Ni(II) as a result of goethite recrystallization, which in turn can be inhibited by the accumulation of metals at the mineral surface. Furthermore, structurally-incorporated Co(II) is more difficult to be released back into solution (i.e. sum of aqueous and extract fractions) than Ni(II) during Fe(II)-catalyzed goethite recrystallization. Overall, our work highlights the significant differences between Co(II) and Ni(II) in their cycling at goethite-water interfaces and intricate interplay with Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization. This improves our understanding of their mobilization and distribution in anoxic goethite-rich systems and can provide useful insights for their enrichment and extraction from natural and artificial laterites generated from the enhanced weathering of ultramafic mine tailings.
钴(Co)和镍(Ni)是现代可再生能源技术的关键金属,也是陆生植物健康和海洋初级生产所必需的微量营养元素。这两种金属通常被表面吸附和/或在结构上并入铁(氧氢)氧化物矿物,如鹅膏石(α-FeOOH),这些矿物普遍存在于地球表面的土壤和沉积物中。在亚缺氧和缺氧环境中,异化作用还原铁(III)产生的含水亚铁(Fe(II))可诱导鹅绿泥石重结晶,进而影响相关金属的种类和移动,例如,Co(III)被还原成 Co(II)。虽然人们普遍认为二价钴和镍在网纹石-水界面的表现类似,但缺乏直接比较它们在铁(II)催化重结晶作用下通过网纹石的循环情况。在此,我们在添加或不添加铁(II)水溶液的中性缺氧条件下,对钴(II)取代的网纹石进行了批量反应实验,并对纯网纹石进行了钴(II)和镍(II)吸附实验。利用高能量分辨荧光检测 X 射线吸收光谱在 Co K 边测定了与鹅绿泥石相关的 Co 的氧化还原状态和配位环境,并通过顺序溶解揭示了吸附后鹅绿泥石中固体结合的 Co 和 Ni 的分布。我们的研究结果表明,与 Ni(II) 相比,在鹅绿泥石中用 Co(II) 取代 Fe(III) 对 Fe(II) 催化的再结晶产生的负反馈较小,这可能与 EXAFS 证明的它们不同的结构畸变有关。在没有铁(II)的情况下,水溶液中的钴(II)比镍(II)更有利于吸附在鹅绿泥石上并更深地融入其中,这表明钴(II)在结构上与鹅绿泥石更相容。Fe(II)的存在显著增强了Co(II)和Ni(II)在结构上的结合,这是鹅辉石重结晶的结果,而金属在矿物表面的积累反过来又会抑制重结晶。此外,在铁(II)催化的鹅绿泥石重结晶过程中,结构上结合的Co(II)比Ni(II)更难被释放回溶液(即水溶液和萃取物的总和)。总之,我们的研究突出了 Co(II) 和 Ni(II) 在鹅绿泥石-水界面循环过程中的显著差异,以及与 Fe(II) 催化重结晶过程之间错综复杂的相互作用。这加深了我们对它们在富含氧化鹅绿泥石系统中的移动和分布的理解,并为从超基性矿山尾矿强化风化产生的天然和人工红土中富集和提取它们提供了有益的启示。
期刊介绍:
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta publishes research papers in a wide range of subjects in terrestrial geochemistry, meteoritics, and planetary geochemistry. The scope of the journal includes:
1). Physical chemistry of gases, aqueous solutions, glasses, and crystalline solids
2). Igneous and metamorphic petrology
3). Chemical processes in the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere of the Earth
4). Organic geochemistry
5). Isotope geochemistry
6). Meteoritics and meteorite impacts
7). Lunar science; and
8). Planetary geochemistry.