Value-sensitive design under ground? Exploring the community-based monitoring of a geothermal project in the Netherlands

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103768
Michael Duijn , Jitske van Popering-Verkerk , Karlien Sambell , Hanneke Puts
{"title":"Value-sensitive design under ground? Exploring the community-based monitoring of a geothermal project in the Netherlands","authors":"Michael Duijn ,&nbsp;Jitske van Popering-Verkerk ,&nbsp;Karlien Sambell ,&nbsp;Hanneke Puts","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition towards a carbon-free energy system necessitates societal changes, next to technological and economic transformations. For geo-energy projects, these societal changes relate to difficulties in achieving local support for subsurface initiatives. Societal acceptance of geo-energy projects entails more than a one-way perspective in which project initiators and experts try to convince society. To increase societal acceptance, an approach that broadly includes public values is imperative to locally embed geo-energy technologies. Value sensitive design of geo-energy systems requires deliberative processes of actor involvement in defining public values. One of the methods, known for its deliberative quality, is community-based monitoring (CBM), often implemented to assess long-term impacts of new technologies on its (social) environment. Research on value-sensitive design of CBM is lacking. This paper explores opportunities for value-sensitive CBM for geo-energy projects by examining 1) how public values could become part of CBM, and 2) how value-sensitive design of CBM could contribute to the project development strategy. An in-depth case study of a geothermal energy project in the Netherlands was conducted. This project has been developed as ‘black box’, similarly as most geo-energy projects in the Netherlands, causing anxiety and suspicion at local communities and stakeholders that are neither directly involved, nor evidently benefit from it. A practical mitigation of both inadequacies is to include local communities, stakeholders and local government, in monitoring the project's impacts. The case study shows that CMB 1) might address the imbalance in the distributive justice by including costs and benefits for local actors, and 2) might mitigate lacking procedural justice by organizing the structured and structural participation of local actors in setting up the monitoring system and in collecting and interpretating data.</div><div>Collaborative monitoring broad arrays of values, as an integrated part of the project development strategy, can address the needs and expectations of local communities and stakeholders, creating better preconditions for their societal acceptance. An adjacent benefit might be that by informing local communities and stakeholders, local governments and legislators can be put at ease, preventing current negative sentiments around geo-energy projects with ‘contested’ technologies from occurring, that often lead to the termination of these projects without well-informed dialogue between actors involved.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103768"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003591/pdfft?md5=a5f3b01c78d8aa6aa2d946baf0f15419&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003591-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition towards a carbon-free energy system necessitates societal changes, next to technological and economic transformations. For geo-energy projects, these societal changes relate to difficulties in achieving local support for subsurface initiatives. Societal acceptance of geo-energy projects entails more than a one-way perspective in which project initiators and experts try to convince society. To increase societal acceptance, an approach that broadly includes public values is imperative to locally embed geo-energy technologies. Value sensitive design of geo-energy systems requires deliberative processes of actor involvement in defining public values. One of the methods, known for its deliberative quality, is community-based monitoring (CBM), often implemented to assess long-term impacts of new technologies on its (social) environment. Research on value-sensitive design of CBM is lacking. This paper explores opportunities for value-sensitive CBM for geo-energy projects by examining 1) how public values could become part of CBM, and 2) how value-sensitive design of CBM could contribute to the project development strategy. An in-depth case study of a geothermal energy project in the Netherlands was conducted. This project has been developed as ‘black box’, similarly as most geo-energy projects in the Netherlands, causing anxiety and suspicion at local communities and stakeholders that are neither directly involved, nor evidently benefit from it. A practical mitigation of both inadequacies is to include local communities, stakeholders and local government, in monitoring the project's impacts. The case study shows that CMB 1) might address the imbalance in the distributive justice by including costs and benefits for local actors, and 2) might mitigate lacking procedural justice by organizing the structured and structural participation of local actors in setting up the monitoring system and in collecting and interpretating data.
Collaborative monitoring broad arrays of values, as an integrated part of the project development strategy, can address the needs and expectations of local communities and stakeholders, creating better preconditions for their societal acceptance. An adjacent benefit might be that by informing local communities and stakeholders, local governments and legislators can be put at ease, preventing current negative sentiments around geo-energy projects with ‘contested’ technologies from occurring, that often lead to the termination of these projects without well-informed dialogue between actors involved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对价值敏感的地下设计?探索荷兰地热项目的社区监测工作
向无碳能源系统过渡,除了技术和经济变革之外,还需要社会变革。对于地质能源项目而言,这些社会变革与获得当地对地下倡议的支持的困难有关。社会对地质能源项目的接受,不仅仅是项目发起人和专家试图说服社会的单向视角。为了提高社会的接受度,必须采取一种广泛包含公众价值观的方法,将地质能源技术融入当地。地质能源系统的价值敏感设计需要参与者参与确定公共价值的审议过程。基于社区的监测(CBM)是其中一种以审议质量著称的方法,通常用于评估新技术对(社会)环境的长期影响。目前还缺乏对 CBM 的价值敏感性设计的研究。本文通过研究:1)公共价值如何成为基于社区的监测的一部分;2)基于社区的监测的价值敏感性设计如何有助于项目开发战略,来探讨地质能源项目的价值敏感性基于社区的监测的机会。对荷兰的一个地热能源项目进行了深入的案例研究。该项目是作为 "黑箱 "开发的,与荷兰大多数地热能源项目类似,引起了当地社区和利益相关者的焦虑和怀疑,因为他们既没有直接参与,也没有明显从中受益。解决这两方面不足的切实可行的方法是让当地社区、利益相关者和当地政府参与到项目影响的监测中来。案例研究表明,CMB:1)通过纳入当地参与者的成本和收益,可以解决分配正义的不平衡问题;2)通过组织当地参与者有组织、有计划地参与监测系统的建立以及数据的收集和解释,可以缓解程序正义的不足。另外一个好处是,通过向当地社区和利益相关者提供信息,可以让当地政府和立法者放心,避免出现目前围绕采用 "有争议 "技术的地质能源项目的负面情绪,这些负面情绪往往会导致这些项目在相关人员没有充分知情的情况下被终止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends? Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ Connected, complex, and carbonized: The country archetypes of the petrochemicals sector Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany Energy subsidies versus cash transfers: the causal effect of misperceptions on public support for countermeasures during the energy crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1