Making energy justice work for women in rural sub-Saharan Africa: A quantitative diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103754
Laurent Jodoin , Dede W. Gafa , Aklesso Egbendewe , Laurent Kossivi Domegni , Ibrahima Diop Gaye , Victorien Justin Ague , Khady Lo , Edgard-Marius Ouendo , Latif Fagbémi , Mayoro Diop
{"title":"Making energy justice work for women in rural sub-Saharan Africa: A quantitative diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo","authors":"Laurent Jodoin ,&nbsp;Dede W. Gafa ,&nbsp;Aklesso Egbendewe ,&nbsp;Laurent Kossivi Domegni ,&nbsp;Ibrahima Diop Gaye ,&nbsp;Victorien Justin Ague ,&nbsp;Khady Lo ,&nbsp;Edgard-Marius Ouendo ,&nbsp;Latif Fagbémi ,&nbsp;Mayoro Diop","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using quantitative and qualitative evidence from an extensive survey of 2291 rural households in three West African countries, this article adopts normative framework based on the energy justice framework (EJF) as well as on the capability approach to identify situations of injustice with vulnerable groups and specific interventions to improve the conditions of this group. It operationalizes and discusses the concepts of availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability as well as sustainability with a perspective on gender equity. Accordingly, our study adopts both an ex-ante (the framework informing evidence) and an ex-post (evidence informing the framework) approach. The results show that a capability approach to energy justice requires a bottom-up, individualistic approach that allows a better identification of energy injustices. For instance, the evidence based on an original operationalization of energy availability considering opportunity costs shows that women have less access to energy and are more exposed to health problems than their male counterparts; this proposition also results in a picture showing more energy poverty than previously known. Also, their limited involvement in energy-related decision-making in the household further perpetuates the vicious cycle of time poverty, income poverty and energy poverty. Furthermore, without specific improvements in social justice for women in rural areas, increasing electricity access in rural areas is unlikely to translate into more energy justice as well as more capabilities for women; in effect, social injustices tend to block the material gains. From a policy perspective, the main recommendation focuses on women and targets the elimination of the ‘worse-case scenario’, that is, the least efficient cookstoves with fetched fuelwood for increasing the capabilities of women and improve the overall energy justice in West African countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using quantitative and qualitative evidence from an extensive survey of 2291 rural households in three West African countries, this article adopts normative framework based on the energy justice framework (EJF) as well as on the capability approach to identify situations of injustice with vulnerable groups and specific interventions to improve the conditions of this group. It operationalizes and discusses the concepts of availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability as well as sustainability with a perspective on gender equity. Accordingly, our study adopts both an ex-ante (the framework informing evidence) and an ex-post (evidence informing the framework) approach. The results show that a capability approach to energy justice requires a bottom-up, individualistic approach that allows a better identification of energy injustices. For instance, the evidence based on an original operationalization of energy availability considering opportunity costs shows that women have less access to energy and are more exposed to health problems than their male counterparts; this proposition also results in a picture showing more energy poverty than previously known. Also, their limited involvement in energy-related decision-making in the household further perpetuates the vicious cycle of time poverty, income poverty and energy poverty. Furthermore, without specific improvements in social justice for women in rural areas, increasing electricity access in rural areas is unlikely to translate into more energy justice as well as more capabilities for women; in effect, social injustices tend to block the material gains. From a policy perspective, the main recommendation focuses on women and targets the elimination of the ‘worse-case scenario’, that is, the least efficient cookstoves with fetched fuelwood for increasing the capabilities of women and improve the overall energy justice in West African countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让撒哈拉以南非洲农村妇女享有能源公正:贝宁、塞内加尔和多哥的定量分析
本文利用对三个西非国家 2291 户农村家庭进行的广泛调查所获得的定量和定性证据,采用了基于能源公正框架(EJF)和能力方法的规范性框架,以确定弱势群体的不公正状况以及改善该群体状况的具体干预措施。本研究从性别平等的角度,对可用性、可负担性、正当程序、透明度和问责制以及可持续性等概念进行了操作和讨论。因此,我们的研究采用了事前(框架为证据提供信息)和事后(证据为框架提供信息)两种方法。研究结果表明,能源公正的能力方法需要一种自下而上的个人主义方法,这样才能更好地识别能源不公正现象。例如,基于机会成本的能源可用性原始操作的证据表明,与男性相比,女性获得能源的机会更少,面临的健康问题也更多。此外,她们在家庭能源相关决策中的参与程度有限,这进一步加剧了时间贫困、收入贫困和能源贫困的恶性循环。此外,如果不具体改善农村地区妇女的社会公正,农村地区电力供应的增加就不可能转化为更多的能源公正以及妇女的更多能力;实际上,社会不公正往往会阻碍物质利益的实现。从政策角度看,主要建议的重点是妇女,目标是消除 "最糟糕的情况",即效率最低的木柴炉灶,以提高妇女的能力,改善西非国家的整体能源公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Making space for environmental justice in renewable energy planning Large inequalities in climate mitigation scenarios are not supported by theories of distributive justice Embracing complexity: Microgrids and community engagement in Australia Policy mixes for net-zero energy transitions: Insights from energy sector integration in Germany Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1