A new perspective on the work of boundary organisations: Bridging knowledge between marine conservation actors in Pacific Small Island Developing States

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103903
Moritz Latour , Frank van Laerhoven
{"title":"A new perspective on the work of boundary organisations: Bridging knowledge between marine conservation actors in Pacific Small Island Developing States","authors":"Moritz Latour ,&nbsp;Frank van Laerhoven","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of growing pressures on the marine environment, evidence-based decision-making in the realm of marine conservation policies is of utmost importance. Through their boundary work, comprising the transfer of knowledge through the production of boundary objects and the facilitation of knowledge exchange, boundary organisations stand out as highly promising in bridging the gap between science and policymaking. However, so far, the research on knowledge exchange between marine scientists and policymakers as well as on boundary organisations in general is largely based on case studies in the Global North. This imbalance highlights the need to conduct studies on knowledge uptake in different geographical and political settings, with an increased focus on the Global South. By exploring the applicability of the current conceptual view on boundary organisations to the specific empirical reality of marine conservation in Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS), our research seeks to improve knowledge uptake in SIDS by identifying factors and strategies for successful boundary work in this context and to enrich the generic understanding of the role of boundary organisations with perspectives from the Global South. We conducted ten interviews with representatives from boundary organisations working on marine conservation in Pacific SIDS. Based on the findings, we developed a new framework for successful boundary work that is better adapted to realities in the Global South and reconceptualised the understanding of boundary work towards science-policy-community interfaces, emphasising that the gap between marine science and policymaking can only be bridged by engaging local communities and their knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 103903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002375/pdfft?md5=7efaca09b6ba5b172a1ac5a8949d2a2b&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002375-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the face of growing pressures on the marine environment, evidence-based decision-making in the realm of marine conservation policies is of utmost importance. Through their boundary work, comprising the transfer of knowledge through the production of boundary objects and the facilitation of knowledge exchange, boundary organisations stand out as highly promising in bridging the gap between science and policymaking. However, so far, the research on knowledge exchange between marine scientists and policymakers as well as on boundary organisations in general is largely based on case studies in the Global North. This imbalance highlights the need to conduct studies on knowledge uptake in different geographical and political settings, with an increased focus on the Global South. By exploring the applicability of the current conceptual view on boundary organisations to the specific empirical reality of marine conservation in Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS), our research seeks to improve knowledge uptake in SIDS by identifying factors and strategies for successful boundary work in this context and to enrich the generic understanding of the role of boundary organisations with perspectives from the Global South. We conducted ten interviews with representatives from boundary organisations working on marine conservation in Pacific SIDS. Based on the findings, we developed a new framework for successful boundary work that is better adapted to realities in the Global South and reconceptualised the understanding of boundary work towards science-policy-community interfaces, emphasising that the gap between marine science and policymaking can only be bridged by engaging local communities and their knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界组织工作的新视角:太平洋小岛屿发展中国家海洋保护行动者之间的知识桥梁
面对海洋环境日益增长的压力,海洋保护政策领域的循证决策至关重要。边界组织的边界工作包括通过生产边界物品和促进知识交流来转移知识,通过这些工作,边界组织在弥合科学与决策之间的差距方面大有可为。然而,迄今为止,有关海洋科学家与政策制定者之间的知识交流以及有关边界组织的总体研究主要基于全球北方的案例研究。这种不平衡突出表明,有必要对不同地理和政治环境下的知识吸收情况进行研究,并更加关注全球南部。通过探索当前关于边界组织的概念性观点对太平洋小岛屿发展中国家(SIDS)海洋保护的具体经验现实的适用性,我们的研究试图通过确定在此背景下边界工作取得成功的因素和策略来改善小岛屿发展中国家的知识吸收,并通过全球南部的观点来丰富对边界组织作用的一般理解。我们对太平洋小岛屿发展中国家从事海洋保护工作的边界组织代表进行了十次访谈。根据访谈结果,我们制定了一个成功开展边界工作的新框架,以更好地适应全球南部的现实情况,并将对边界工作的理解重新概念化为科学-政策-社区界面,强调只有通过当地社区及其知识的参与,才能弥合海洋科学与政策制定之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Forest owners’ perceptions of machine learning: Insights from swedish forestry Understanding how landscape value and climate risk discourses can improve adaptation planning: Insights from Q-method Articulating futures: Community storylines and assisted ecosystem adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef Insights into the public engagement of coastal geoscientists Flood data platform governance: Identifying the technological and socio-technical approach(es) differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1