Experimental study on the suppression of inlet blockage in rotating detonation combustor by porous-wall

IF 3.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Acta Astronautica Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.09.030
{"title":"Experimental study on the suppression of inlet blockage in rotating detonation combustor by porous-wall","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.09.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rotating detonation combustor (RDC) is renowned for its ability to provide substantial pressure gains. Nonetheless, during the stable operation of the RDC, the high-pressure rotating detonation wave (RDW) at the combustor inlet induces an increase in upstream chamber pressure, ultimately compromising engine stability and performance. To fully harness the performance advantages of the turbine-based continuous rotating detonation engine (TBCRDE) while maintaining engine stability, a porous-wall RDC has been developed to alleviate intake blockage and mitigate upstream chamber pressure rise. The operating modes, pressure rise characteristics, and performance parameters of both the porous-wall RDC and the reference configuration were systematically evaluated across varying air flow rates and nozzle designs. This analysis concentrated on the operational characteristics of the porous-wall RDC and its mechanisms for suppressing upstream chamber pressure rise. The findings reveal that the porous-wall RDC significantly extends the stable operating range and effectively reduces upstream chamber pressure rise by minimizing intake blockage. Specifically, the stable operating range is enhanced by 50 % at an outlet area ratio of 0.33, with stable rotating detonation combustion achieved at an outlet area ratio of 0.25. At an air flow rate of 1 kg/s and an outlet area ratio of 0.33, the chamber pressure rise is optimally suppressed, demonstrating a maximum reduction of approximately 16.4 %. The total pressure recovery coefficient of the combustor was analyzed, taking into account both intake loss and combustor pressure gain capabilities, and the propulsion performance of the two configurations was compared. The porous-wall RDC effectively reduces intake loss while slightly diminishing combustor pressure gain capability, resulting in a marginal increase in the total pressure recovery coefficient. Although this leads to a slight reduction in propulsion performance during chamber pressure rise suppression, the overall engine matching environment benefits from enhanced matching stability. Consequently, other engine components experience a reduced performance decline. Therefore, the implementation of a porous-wall structure is anticipated to improve the overall propulsion performance of the engine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44971,"journal":{"name":"Acta Astronautica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Astronautica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576524005320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rotating detonation combustor (RDC) is renowned for its ability to provide substantial pressure gains. Nonetheless, during the stable operation of the RDC, the high-pressure rotating detonation wave (RDW) at the combustor inlet induces an increase in upstream chamber pressure, ultimately compromising engine stability and performance. To fully harness the performance advantages of the turbine-based continuous rotating detonation engine (TBCRDE) while maintaining engine stability, a porous-wall RDC has been developed to alleviate intake blockage and mitigate upstream chamber pressure rise. The operating modes, pressure rise characteristics, and performance parameters of both the porous-wall RDC and the reference configuration were systematically evaluated across varying air flow rates and nozzle designs. This analysis concentrated on the operational characteristics of the porous-wall RDC and its mechanisms for suppressing upstream chamber pressure rise. The findings reveal that the porous-wall RDC significantly extends the stable operating range and effectively reduces upstream chamber pressure rise by minimizing intake blockage. Specifically, the stable operating range is enhanced by 50 % at an outlet area ratio of 0.33, with stable rotating detonation combustion achieved at an outlet area ratio of 0.25. At an air flow rate of 1 kg/s and an outlet area ratio of 0.33, the chamber pressure rise is optimally suppressed, demonstrating a maximum reduction of approximately 16.4 %. The total pressure recovery coefficient of the combustor was analyzed, taking into account both intake loss and combustor pressure gain capabilities, and the propulsion performance of the two configurations was compared. The porous-wall RDC effectively reduces intake loss while slightly diminishing combustor pressure gain capability, resulting in a marginal increase in the total pressure recovery coefficient. Although this leads to a slight reduction in propulsion performance during chamber pressure rise suppression, the overall engine matching environment benefits from enhanced matching stability. Consequently, other engine components experience a reduced performance decline. Therefore, the implementation of a porous-wall structure is anticipated to improve the overall propulsion performance of the engine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多孔壁抑制旋转爆燃燃烧器入口堵塞的实验研究
旋转爆燃燃烧器(RDC)因其能够提供可观的压力增益而闻名于世。然而,在 RDC 稳定运行期间,燃烧器入口处的高压旋转爆轰波 (RDW) 会导致上游燃烧室压力升高,最终影响发动机的稳定性和性能。为了充分利用涡轮连续旋转爆轰发动机(TBCRDE)的性能优势,同时保持发动机的稳定性,我们开发了一种多孔壁 RDC,以减轻进气道堵塞和上游气室压力上升。针对不同的空气流速和喷嘴设计,对多孔壁 RDC 和参考配置的工作模式、压升特性和性能参数进行了系统评估。分析的重点是多孔壁 RDC 的运行特性及其抑制上游气室压力上升的机制。研究结果表明,多孔壁 RDC 通过最大限度地减少进气阻塞,显著扩大了稳定工作范围,并有效降低了上游腔压力上升。具体地说,当出口面积比为 0.33 时,稳定工作范围提高了 50%,而当出口面积比为 0.25 时,旋转爆燃得以稳定实现。在空气流速为 1 千克/秒、出口面积比为 0.33 的情况下,燃烧室压力升高得到了最佳抑制,最大降幅约为 16.4%。考虑到进气损失和燃烧器增压能力,对燃烧器的总压力恢复系数进行了分析,并对两种配置的推进性能进行了比较。多孔壁 RDC 有效地减少了进气损失,同时略微降低了燃烧器增压能力,从而使总压力恢复系数略有增加。虽然这导致在燃烧室压力上升抑制期间推进性能略有下降,但整个发动机匹配环境因匹配稳定性增强而受益。因此,发动机其他部件的性能下降也会减少。因此,采用多孔壁结构有望提高发动机的整体推进性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Astronautica
Acta Astronautica 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
22.90%
发文量
599
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Acta Astronautica is sponsored by the International Academy of Astronautics. Content is based on original contributions in all fields of basic, engineering, life and social space sciences and of space technology related to: The peaceful scientific exploration of space, Its exploitation for human welfare and progress, Conception, design, development and operation of space-borne and Earth-based systems, In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes selected proceedings of the annual International Astronautical Congress (IAC), transactions of the IAA and special issues on topics of current interest, such as microgravity, space station technology, geostationary orbits, and space economics. Other subject areas include satellite technology, space transportation and communications, space energy, power and propulsion, astrodynamics, extraterrestrial intelligence and Earth observations.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating potential landing sites for the Artemis III mission using a multi-criteria decision making approach Satellite surface charging in LEO with ProPIC Exploring potential candidates of alternative solid hydrocarbon propellants for cold-gas thrusters Mesenchymal stem cell transplant as an intervention to ameliorate disuse-induced muscle atrophy in a mouse model of simulated microgravity DIANA: An underwater analog space mission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1