Yanxin Liu , Huajiao Li , Huijun Ren , Hongdian Jiang , Bo Ren , Ning Ma , Zhensong Chen , Weiqiong Zhong , Sergio Ulgiati
{"title":"Shared responsibility for carbon emission reduction in worldwide “steel- electric vehicle” trade within a sustainable industrial chain perspective","authors":"Yanxin Liu , Huajiao Li , Huijun Ren , Hongdian Jiang , Bo Ren , Ning Ma , Zhensong Chen , Weiqiong Zhong , Sergio Ulgiati","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) is an important industry to promote global sustainability, but it consumes a lot of steel which produce more carbon dioxide during the production. To clarify the shared responsibility of carbon reduction related to EVs in the countries, it is necessary to assess the material flows of steel associated to the industry chain. This study constructed a multi-layer trade network model of “steel-electric vehicle” industry chain and identified key trade carbon transfer paths. The results firstly show the worldwide trade volume and the number of involved countries increased enormously from 2017 to 2021. Secondly, the non-renewable energies (coal) were diverted more from upstream countries. Finally, the trade patterns mostly flow from upstream (Brazil, Australia) to midstream steel producers (China, Germany), and then to downstream EVs manufacturers (USA), from which trade flows go back to middle and upstream countries. Instead, trade embodied carbon flows mainly into downstream developed countries. It reflects the huge imbalance among production process of different stages, energy consumed structure and trade carbon emissions in the worldwide “steel-electric vehicle” industry chain. Based on the results, this study proposes policy implications for promoting regional industrial ecological sustainability from the perspectives of industry chain, trading partners and countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 108393"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Electric vehicles (EVs) is an important industry to promote global sustainability, but it consumes a lot of steel which produce more carbon dioxide during the production. To clarify the shared responsibility of carbon reduction related to EVs in the countries, it is necessary to assess the material flows of steel associated to the industry chain. This study constructed a multi-layer trade network model of “steel-electric vehicle” industry chain and identified key trade carbon transfer paths. The results firstly show the worldwide trade volume and the number of involved countries increased enormously from 2017 to 2021. Secondly, the non-renewable energies (coal) were diverted more from upstream countries. Finally, the trade patterns mostly flow from upstream (Brazil, Australia) to midstream steel producers (China, Germany), and then to downstream EVs manufacturers (USA), from which trade flows go back to middle and upstream countries. Instead, trade embodied carbon flows mainly into downstream developed countries. It reflects the huge imbalance among production process of different stages, energy consumed structure and trade carbon emissions in the worldwide “steel-electric vehicle” industry chain. Based on the results, this study proposes policy implications for promoting regional industrial ecological sustainability from the perspectives of industry chain, trading partners and countries.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.