Identifying local priorities for adaptation to sea level rise via stated preferences: A choice experiment from two coastal cities in Guatemala

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107389
William F. Vásquez , Robert H. Nazarian , Jennifer M. Trudeau
{"title":"Identifying local priorities for adaptation to sea level rise via stated preferences: A choice experiment from two coastal cities in Guatemala","authors":"William F. Vásquez ,&nbsp;Robert H. Nazarian ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Trudeau","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although an international concern and management challenge, sea level rise (SLR) has disparate secondary effects across locations due to variations in coastal topography and human modifications of natural and built environments. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to SLR adaptations is not appropriate if those variations contribute to geographic heterogeneity in household preferences. Using a discrete choice experiment, we compare and contrast household preferences for adaptations to a broad list of secondary SLR effects (i.e., enhanced flooding, beach erosion, salinization of water, and loss of coastal and marine ecosystems) and program management approaches (i.e. municipal, governmental, and interinstitutional) across two SLR-susceptible municipalities, within 8 miles of each other, in southern Guatemala: Iztapa and Puerto San José. We find evidence of common preferences for investing in measures against beach erosion and changes in ecosystem; however, rankings flip across locations for flooding and salinization of water. In Iztapa, the part-worth estimates from mixed-logit models range from US$ 1.21 to US$ 2.99 per attribute per month for flood and ecosystem damage preventions, respectively, exceeding the part-worth estimates from Puerto San José of US$ 0 - US$ 2.51, for protection against salinization of well water and beach erosion. Our findings also indicate that municipal management is the least preferred in both locations. However, whereas households from Puerto San José are indifferent between the national governing body, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) and interinstitutional management, households from Iztapa prefer the latter and are willing to pay twice as much, a premium of up to US$ 3.63/month, for an interinstitutional committee relative to the municipality. Based on our findings, robust SLR adaptation policies should be nuanced, reflecting location-specific preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 107389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124003740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although an international concern and management challenge, sea level rise (SLR) has disparate secondary effects across locations due to variations in coastal topography and human modifications of natural and built environments. Therefore, a one-size-fits-all approach to SLR adaptations is not appropriate if those variations contribute to geographic heterogeneity in household preferences. Using a discrete choice experiment, we compare and contrast household preferences for adaptations to a broad list of secondary SLR effects (i.e., enhanced flooding, beach erosion, salinization of water, and loss of coastal and marine ecosystems) and program management approaches (i.e. municipal, governmental, and interinstitutional) across two SLR-susceptible municipalities, within 8 miles of each other, in southern Guatemala: Iztapa and Puerto San José. We find evidence of common preferences for investing in measures against beach erosion and changes in ecosystem; however, rankings flip across locations for flooding and salinization of water. In Iztapa, the part-worth estimates from mixed-logit models range from US$ 1.21 to US$ 2.99 per attribute per month for flood and ecosystem damage preventions, respectively, exceeding the part-worth estimates from Puerto San José of US$ 0 - US$ 2.51, for protection against salinization of well water and beach erosion. Our findings also indicate that municipal management is the least preferred in both locations. However, whereas households from Puerto San José are indifferent between the national governing body, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN) and interinstitutional management, households from Iztapa prefer the latter and are willing to pay twice as much, a premium of up to US$ 3.63/month, for an interinstitutional committee relative to the municipality. Based on our findings, robust SLR adaptation policies should be nuanced, reflecting location-specific preferences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过陈述偏好确定当地适应海平面上升的优先事项:危地马拉两个沿海城市的选择实验
尽管海平面上升(SLR)是一个国际性问题和管理挑战,但由于沿海地形的差异以及人类对自然环境和建筑环境的改造,海平面上升在不同地点会产生不同的次生影响。因此,如果这些差异导致了家庭偏好的地域异质性,那么采用 "一刀切 "的方法来适应 SLR 是不合适的。通过离散选择实验,我们比较并对比了危地马拉南部相距 8 英里以内的两个易受可持续土地退化和干旱影响的城市(伊兹塔帕和圣何塞港)的家庭对适应一系列次生可持续土地退化和干旱影响(即洪水加剧、海滩侵蚀、海水盐碱化以及沿海和海洋生态系统丧失)的偏好以及计划管理方法(即市政、政府和机构间)。我们发现有证据表明,在投资于防止海滩侵蚀和生态系统变化的措施方面,人们有着共同的偏好;然而,在洪水和海水盐碱化方面,各地的排名却不尽相同。在伊兹塔帕,混合对数模型得出的部分价值估算值为每个属性每月 1.21 美元至 2.99 美元不等,而在圣何塞港,防止井水盐碱化和海滩侵蚀的部分价值估算值为 0 美元至 2.51 美元不等。我们的研究结果还表明,在这两个地方,市政管理都是最不受欢迎的。然而,圣何塞港的住户在国家管理机构环境与自然资源部(MARN)和机构间管理之间无动于衷,而伊兹塔帕的住户则更倾向于后者,并愿意为机构间委员会支付比市政当局高出一倍的费用,最高可达 3.63 美元/月。根据我们的研究结果,稳健的可持续土地退化和干旱适应政策应具有细微差别,反映特定地点的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Predicting the cumulative effects of multiple stressors on shellfish ecosystem service potential Decomposition of driving factors of carbon emissions and carbon sinks from marine fishery production in China Robust integrated multi-mode scheduling of flexible loading and unloading operations with maintenance services in a port container terminal The interaction between climate change and marine fisheries: Review, challenges, and gaps Participatory mapping of uses and ecosystem services as a useful tool for the identification of conflicts in Marine Protected Areas: The case of the Cíes Islands archipelago (NW Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1