Variability of theory of mind versus pragmatic ability in typical and atypical development

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106466
Anna Babarczy , Dorottya Dobó , Péter Nagy , Andrea Mészáros , Ágnes Lukács
{"title":"Variability of theory of mind versus pragmatic ability in typical and atypical development","authors":"Anna Babarczy ,&nbsp;Dorottya Dobó ,&nbsp;Péter Nagy ,&nbsp;Andrea Mészáros ,&nbsp;Ágnes Lukács","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Numerous studies have linked deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM) with language problems. We aimed to explore the similarities and differences between children's patterns of performance on a ToM task that requires minimal linguistic skill and a pragmatic inference task that relies on both ToM and language. We assessed variability in pragmatic inference skills and ToM across populations of children (8–14 years) displaying varying cognitive profiles. We further compared the sensitivity of ToM versus pragmatic ability to core language skills, memory and executive functioning (EF).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>ToM was tested using the Social Attribution Task (SAT-MC-II). Pragmatic ability was assessed in an implicature comprehension task. Receptive vocabulary, grammar comprehension, short-term and working memory (STM and WM) capacity and EF were measured using Hungarian adaptations of standard tasks and tests developed by the authors’ lab. In addition to typically developing (TD) children (<em>n</em> = 33), we included children with neurodevelopmental disorders where ToM and/or language abilities are vulnerable: autism spectrum disorder (ASD, <em>n</em> = 26), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, <em>n</em> = 25) and developmental language disorder (DLD, <em>n</em> = 18).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results revealed a significant but only moderate positive correlation between pragmatic inference and ToM indicating that the two abilities are related but distinct. The ASD group showed impairments in both ToM and pragmatic inference ability but no significant deficit was observed in ADHD or DLD relative to TD children in either skill. However, while SAT-MC-II results were only affected by verbal WM and vocabulary measures, pragmatic performance was associated with STM, verbal WM, EF, grammatical skills and vocabulary.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate that disentangling the contributions of different cognitive skills to ToM tasks may help clarify the role of ToM in language skills and identify distinct patterns of ToM and pragmatic skills in developmental disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 106466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992424000625/pdfft?md5=5e60c1dd74e8600cb2a6bdb1c95abfda&pid=1-s2.0-S0021992424000625-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992424000625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Numerous studies have linked deficits in Theory of Mind (ToM) with language problems. We aimed to explore the similarities and differences between children's patterns of performance on a ToM task that requires minimal linguistic skill and a pragmatic inference task that relies on both ToM and language. We assessed variability in pragmatic inference skills and ToM across populations of children (8–14 years) displaying varying cognitive profiles. We further compared the sensitivity of ToM versus pragmatic ability to core language skills, memory and executive functioning (EF).

Method

ToM was tested using the Social Attribution Task (SAT-MC-II). Pragmatic ability was assessed in an implicature comprehension task. Receptive vocabulary, grammar comprehension, short-term and working memory (STM and WM) capacity and EF were measured using Hungarian adaptations of standard tasks and tests developed by the authors’ lab. In addition to typically developing (TD) children (n = 33), we included children with neurodevelopmental disorders where ToM and/or language abilities are vulnerable: autism spectrum disorder (ASD, n = 26), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, n = 25) and developmental language disorder (DLD, n = 18).

Results

Results revealed a significant but only moderate positive correlation between pragmatic inference and ToM indicating that the two abilities are related but distinct. The ASD group showed impairments in both ToM and pragmatic inference ability but no significant deficit was observed in ADHD or DLD relative to TD children in either skill. However, while SAT-MC-II results were only affected by verbal WM and vocabulary measures, pragmatic performance was associated with STM, verbal WM, EF, grammatical skills and vocabulary.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that disentangling the contributions of different cognitive skills to ToM tasks may help clarify the role of ToM in language skills and identify distinct patterns of ToM and pragmatic skills in developmental disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思维理论与实用能力在典型和非典型发展中的差异性
导言:许多研究都将心智理论(ToM)的缺陷与语言问题联系在一起。我们的目的是探索儿童在对语言技能要求极低的心智图式(ToM)任务和同时依赖心智图式和语言的语用推断任务中表现模式的异同。我们评估了不同认知能力的儿童(8-14 岁)在语用推理技能和 ToM 方面的差异。我们进一步比较了语用推理能力与语用能力对核心语言技能、记忆力和执行功能(EF)的敏感性。语用能力通过含意理解任务进行评估。接受词汇、语法理解、短期记忆和工作记忆(STM 和 WM)能力以及 EF 是通过作者实验室开发的标准任务和测试的匈牙利语改编版进行测量的。除了典型发育(TD)儿童(n = 33)外,我们还纳入了ToM和/或语言能力易受影响的神经发育障碍儿童:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD,n = 26)、注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD,n = 25)和发育性语言障碍(DLD,n = 18)。ASD 组的 ToM 和语用推理能力均有缺陷,但相对于 TD 儿童而言,ADHD 或 DLD 儿童在这两种能力上均没有明显缺陷。然而,SAT-MC-II 的结果只受言语 WM 和词汇量测量的影响,而语用能力的表现则与 STM、言语 WM、EF、语法技能和词汇量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic assessment of word learning as a predictor of response to vocabulary intervention Editorial Board Shifting from a female-dominated profession: The perceptions and experiences of male students in communication sciences and disorders Cognitive processing biases of social anxiety in adults who do and do not stutter Linguistic factors associated with stuttering-like disfluencies in Japanese preschool and school-aged children who stutter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1