Fiscal decentralization's impact on carbon emissions and its interactions with environmental regulations, economic development, and industrialization: Evidence from 288 cities in China

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107681
Zhongyao Cai , Xuhui Ding , Ziqian Zhou , Aixi Han , Siqi Yu , Xinyu Yang , Ping Jiang
{"title":"Fiscal decentralization's impact on carbon emissions and its interactions with environmental regulations, economic development, and industrialization: Evidence from 288 cities in China","authors":"Zhongyao Cai ,&nbsp;Xuhui Ding ,&nbsp;Ziqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Aixi Han ,&nbsp;Siqi Yu ,&nbsp;Xinyu Yang ,&nbsp;Ping Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the global focus on climate change and sustainable development, understanding the impact of China's fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions is essential for supporting green transformation and achieving carbon peaking and neutrality targets. This study examines data from 288 Chinese cities between 2003 and 2021, using fixed effects, moderation effects, and threshold effects models to assess the relationship between fiscal decentralization and carbon emissions, alongside its interaction with environmental regulation, economic development, industrialization, and city hierarchy. The results show that fiscal decentralization significantly aids carbon reduction, but stronger environmental regulations have not effectively slowed emission growth, creating a \"green paradox.\" Relaxed regulations prioritize short-term economic gains, leading to underinvestment and fragmented regulatory efforts, which weaken emissions control. As economic development advances, fiscal decentralization's impact on carbon emissions shifts from positive to negative. Additionally, with increasing industrialization, the negative influence of fiscal decentralization on emission intensity becomes more pronounced. In non-first-tier cities, weak regulatory enforcement and limited autonomy hinder effective carbon reduction policies. To address these issues, the central government should enhance guidance and oversight of local environmental policies, ensure strict enforcement, optimize fiscal resources for environmental investment, and promote green economic transformation. A tailored approach to fiscal decentralization is needed to balance economic growth with environmental protection, achieving mutually beneficial outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107681"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002683","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the global focus on climate change and sustainable development, understanding the impact of China's fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions is essential for supporting green transformation and achieving carbon peaking and neutrality targets. This study examines data from 288 Chinese cities between 2003 and 2021, using fixed effects, moderation effects, and threshold effects models to assess the relationship between fiscal decentralization and carbon emissions, alongside its interaction with environmental regulation, economic development, industrialization, and city hierarchy. The results show that fiscal decentralization significantly aids carbon reduction, but stronger environmental regulations have not effectively slowed emission growth, creating a "green paradox." Relaxed regulations prioritize short-term economic gains, leading to underinvestment and fragmented regulatory efforts, which weaken emissions control. As economic development advances, fiscal decentralization's impact on carbon emissions shifts from positive to negative. Additionally, with increasing industrialization, the negative influence of fiscal decentralization on emission intensity becomes more pronounced. In non-first-tier cities, weak regulatory enforcement and limited autonomy hinder effective carbon reduction policies. To address these issues, the central government should enhance guidance and oversight of local environmental policies, ensure strict enforcement, optimize fiscal resources for environmental investment, and promote green economic transformation. A tailored approach to fiscal decentralization is needed to balance economic growth with environmental protection, achieving mutually beneficial outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政分权对碳排放的影响及其与环境法规、经济发展和工业化的相互作用:来自中国 288 个城市的证据
鉴于全球对气候变化和可持续发展的关注,了解中国财政分权对碳排放的影响对于支持绿色转型、实现碳封顶和碳中和目标至关重要。本研究考察了 2003 年至 2021 年间中国 288 个城市的数据,采用固定效应、调节效应和门槛效应模型评估了财政分权与碳排放之间的关系,以及财政分权与环境监管、经济发展、工业化和城市等级制度之间的相互作用。结果表明,财政分权大大有助于减少碳排放,但加强环境监管并未有效减缓排放增长,这就形成了一个 "绿色悖论"。宽松的监管优先考虑短期经济收益,导致投资不足和监管工作分散,从而削弱了排放控制。随着经济的发展,财政分权对碳排放的影响由正转负。此外,随着工业化程度的提高,财政分权对排放强度的负面影响会更加明显。在非一线城市,薄弱的监管执行力和有限的自治权阻碍了有效的碳减排政策。针对这些问题,中央政府应加强对地方环境政策的指导和监督,确保严格执法,优化财政资源用于环保投资,促进绿色经济转型。需要采取有针对性的财政权力下放方式,以平衡经济增长与环境保护,实现互利共赢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1