The Right to Rehabilitation for People With Dementia: A Codesign Approach to Barriers and Solutions

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/hex.70036
Natasha Layton, Catherine Devanny, Keith Hill, Kate Swaffer, Grant Russell, Lee-Fay Low, Den-Ching A. Lee, Monica Cations, Helen Skouteris, Claire MC O'Connor, Taya A. Collyer, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Nadine E. Andrew, Terry Haines, Velandai K. Srikanth, Alan Petersen, Michele L. Callisaya
{"title":"The Right to Rehabilitation for People With Dementia: A Codesign Approach to Barriers and Solutions","authors":"Natasha Layton,&nbsp;Catherine Devanny,&nbsp;Keith Hill,&nbsp;Kate Swaffer,&nbsp;Grant Russell,&nbsp;Lee-Fay Low,&nbsp;Den-Ching A. Lee,&nbsp;Monica Cations,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris,&nbsp;Claire MC O'Connor,&nbsp;Taya A. Collyer,&nbsp;Barbara Barbosa Neves,&nbsp;Nadine E. Andrew,&nbsp;Terry Haines,&nbsp;Velandai K. Srikanth,&nbsp;Alan Petersen,&nbsp;Michele L. Callisaya","doi":"10.1111/hex.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People with dementia of all ages have a human right to equal access to quality health care. Despite evidence regarding its effectiveness, many people living with dementia are unable to access rehabilitation for promoting function and quality of life. Conducted in Australia, this study was designed to (1) explore barriers to access to dementia rehabilitation and (2) identify solutions that improve access to rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>People living with dementia (<i>n</i> = 5) and care partners (<i>n</i> = 8) and health professionals (<i>n</i> = 13) were recruited nationally. Experience-based codesign across three virtual workshops was used to understand barriers and design solutions to improve access to rehabilitation treatments. Socio-ecological analyses, using the Levesque Access to Health care framework, were applied to findings regarding barriers and to aid selection of solutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was high attendance (92.3%) across the three workshops. Barriers were identified at a user level (including lack of knowledge, transport, cost and difficulty navigating the health, aged care and disability sectors) and health service level (including health professional low dementia knowledge and negative attitudes, inequitable funding models and non-existent or fragmented services). Solutions focused on widespread dementia education and training, including ensuring that people with dementia and their care partners know about rehabilitation therapies and that health professionals, aged care and disability co-ordinators know how to refer to and deliver rehabilitation interventions. Dementia care navigators, changes to Australia's public funding models and specific dementia rehabilitation programmes were also recommended.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers to accessing rehabilitation for people with dementia exist at multiple levels and will require a whole-community and systems approach to ensure change.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>People with living experience (preferred term by those involved) were involved at two levels within this research. A Chief Investigator living with dementia was involved in the design of the study and writing of the manuscript. People with living experience, care partners and service providers were participants in the codesign process to identify barriers and design potential solutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

People with dementia of all ages have a human right to equal access to quality health care. Despite evidence regarding its effectiveness, many people living with dementia are unable to access rehabilitation for promoting function and quality of life. Conducted in Australia, this study was designed to (1) explore barriers to access to dementia rehabilitation and (2) identify solutions that improve access to rehabilitation.

Methods

People living with dementia (n = 5) and care partners (n = 8) and health professionals (n = 13) were recruited nationally. Experience-based codesign across three virtual workshops was used to understand barriers and design solutions to improve access to rehabilitation treatments. Socio-ecological analyses, using the Levesque Access to Health care framework, were applied to findings regarding barriers and to aid selection of solutions.

Results

There was high attendance (92.3%) across the three workshops. Barriers were identified at a user level (including lack of knowledge, transport, cost and difficulty navigating the health, aged care and disability sectors) and health service level (including health professional low dementia knowledge and negative attitudes, inequitable funding models and non-existent or fragmented services). Solutions focused on widespread dementia education and training, including ensuring that people with dementia and their care partners know about rehabilitation therapies and that health professionals, aged care and disability co-ordinators know how to refer to and deliver rehabilitation interventions. Dementia care navigators, changes to Australia's public funding models and specific dementia rehabilitation programmes were also recommended.

Conclusions

Barriers to accessing rehabilitation for people with dementia exist at multiple levels and will require a whole-community and systems approach to ensure change.

Patient or Public Contribution

People with living experience (preferred term by those involved) were involved at two levels within this research. A Chief Investigator living with dementia was involved in the design of the study and writing of the manuscript. People with living experience, care partners and service providers were participants in the codesign process to identify barriers and design potential solutions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者的康复权:障碍与解决方案的协同设计方法
导言 所有年龄段的痴呆症患者都享有平等获得优质医疗保健服务的人权。尽管有证据表明康复治疗是有效的,但许多痴呆症患者仍无法通过康复治疗来增强功能和提高生活质量。本研究在澳大利亚进行,旨在:(1)探讨痴呆症康复治疗的障碍;(2)找出改善康复治疗的解决方案。 方法 在全国范围内招募痴呆症患者(5 人)、护理伙伴(8 人)和医疗专业人员(13 人)。通过三个虚拟研讨会,以经验为基础进行代码设计,以了解障碍并设计解决方案,从而改善康复治疗的可及性。采用 Levesque 医疗保健获取框架进行社会生态分析,以得出有关障碍的结论,并帮助选择解决方案。 结果 三个研讨会的出席率都很高(92.3%)。在用户层面(包括缺乏知识、交通、费用以及难以在医疗、老年护理和残疾部门之间游刃有余)和医疗服务层面(包括医疗专业人员对痴呆症知识的缺乏和消极态度、不公平的资助模式以及不存在或分散的服务)发现了障碍。解决方案的重点是广泛开展痴呆症教育和培训,包括确保痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴了解康复疗法,确保医疗专业人员、老年护理和残疾人协调员知道如何转介和提供康复干预。此外,还建议设立痴呆症护理导航员,改变澳大利亚的公共资助模式,并制定专门的痴呆症康复计划。 结论 阻碍痴呆症患者获得康复服务的障碍存在于多个层面,需要采取整体社区和系统方法来确保改变。 患者或公众的贡献 有生活经验的人(相关人员的首选术语)在两个层面上参与了这项研究。一位患有痴呆症的首席研究员参与了研究的设计和手稿的撰写。有生活经验的人、护理伙伴和服务提供者参与了编码设计过程,以确定障碍和设计潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Beyond the Queue: Exploring Waiting Practices in the Stories of Patients With Breast Cancer Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1