Management change following transthoracic echocardiogram in the intensive care unit

Jeremy A Smith, Ravi Mistry
{"title":"Management change following transthoracic echocardiogram in the intensive care unit","authors":"Jeremy A Smith,&nbsp;Ravi Mistry","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The optimal utilisation of echocardiography in intensive care units (ICU) is not yet known; however, its use is becoming more frequent. Management change from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in ICU is quoted to be from 3% to 50%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review of clinical practice was performed over a 2-month period in a tertiary adult ICU, to explore the utilisation of formal TTEs and the findings of these. The rate of management change and critical findings were investigated, along with the indication for TTE and the patient cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-three TTEs were performed in 54 patients. A change in management occurred in 25.4% (16/63) of TTEs, with critical findings being found in 47.6% (30/63) of all TTEs. The most common indications for formal TTEs were incompletely differentiated or further evaluation of shock, and post arrest cardiac function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Almost half of the TTEs performed had critical findings, with common critical findings being severe LV dysfunction, severe RV dysfunction and regional wall motion abnormalities. Despite critical findings being seen frequently, there was only management change in 25%, suggesting that several of the critical findings were already suspected, clinically confirmed or had anticipatory management prior to TTE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Critical findings are common in critically ill patients. However, not all critical findings will lead to a change in management. Formal TTEs in the ICU should be focussed to the clinical question being asked and a screening intensivist performed bedside TTE may be appropriate in certain situations to decrease workload of cardiology department.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"27 3","pages":"174-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose

The optimal utilisation of echocardiography in intensive care units (ICU) is not yet known; however, its use is becoming more frequent. Management change from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in ICU is quoted to be from 3% to 50%.

Methods

A retrospective review of clinical practice was performed over a 2-month period in a tertiary adult ICU, to explore the utilisation of formal TTEs and the findings of these. The rate of management change and critical findings were investigated, along with the indication for TTE and the patient cohort.

Results

Sixty-three TTEs were performed in 54 patients. A change in management occurred in 25.4% (16/63) of TTEs, with critical findings being found in 47.6% (30/63) of all TTEs. The most common indications for formal TTEs were incompletely differentiated or further evaluation of shock, and post arrest cardiac function.

Discussion

Almost half of the TTEs performed had critical findings, with common critical findings being severe LV dysfunction, severe RV dysfunction and regional wall motion abnormalities. Despite critical findings being seen frequently, there was only management change in 25%, suggesting that several of the critical findings were already suspected, clinically confirmed or had anticipatory management prior to TTE.

Conclusion

Critical findings are common in critically ill patients. However, not all critical findings will lead to a change in management. Formal TTEs in the ICU should be focussed to the clinical question being asked and a screening intensivist performed bedside TTE may be appropriate in certain situations to decrease workload of cardiology department.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房经胸超声心动图检查后的管理变化
导言/目的 目前尚不清楚重症监护病房(ICU)中超声心动图的最佳使用率,但其使用正变得越来越频繁。据估计,重症监护病房中经胸超声心动图(TTE)对管理的改变从 3% 到 50% 不等。 方法 在一个三级成人重症监护病房进行了为期两个月的临床实践回顾,以探讨正式 TTE 的使用情况和结果。研究还调查了管理变化率和关键结果,以及 TTE 的适应症和患者群。 结果 对 54 名患者进行了 63 次 TTE 检查。25.4%(16/63)的 TTE 患者改变了治疗方案,47.6%(30/63)的 TTE 患者发现了危急病症。正式 TTE 最常见的适应症是休克分化不完全或进一步评估,以及骤停后的心脏功能。 讨论 近一半的 TTE 检查有危重发现,常见的危重发现是严重左心室功能障碍、严重左心室功能障碍和区域室壁运动异常。尽管危重结果经常出现,但只有 25% 的患者改变了治疗方案,这表明一些危重结果在进行 TTE 之前就已被怀疑、临床证实或进行了预期治疗。 结论 危重病人常见危重结果。然而,并非所有的危重发现都会导致管理的改变。在重症监护病房进行正式的 TTE 检查时,应重点关注所提出的临床问题,在某些情况下,由重症监护医生进行床旁 TTE 筛选可能是合适的,可减少心脏科的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management – Let's practice the evidence EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided Ultrasound‐assisted and landmark‐based nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy adults: A retrospective analysis Cutaneous ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory activity in tinea capitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1