Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts After Direct or Indirect Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2854
Wouter van Ballegooijen,Josine Rawee,Christina Palantza,Clara Miguel,Mathias Harrer,Ioana Cristea,Remco de Winter,Renske Gilissen,Merijn Eikelenboom,Aartjan Beekman,Pim Cuijpers
{"title":"Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts After Direct or Indirect Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Wouter van Ballegooijen,Josine Rawee,Christina Palantza,Clara Miguel,Mathias Harrer,Ioana Cristea,Remco de Winter,Renske Gilissen,Merijn Eikelenboom,Aartjan Beekman,Pim Cuijpers","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nSuicidal ideation and suicide attempts are debilitating mental health problems that are often treated with indirect psychotherapy (ie, psychotherapy that focuses on other mental health problems, such as depression or personality disorders). The effects of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicidal ideation have not yet been examined in a meta-analysis, and several trials have been published since a previous meta-analysis examined the effect size of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicide attempts.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo investigate the effect sizes of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicidal ideation and the incidence of suicide attempts.\r\n\r\nData Sources\r\nPubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for articles published up until April 1, 2023.\r\n\r\nStudy Selection\r\nRandomized clinical trials of psychotherapy for any mental health problem, delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reporting suicidal ideation or suicide attempts were included. Studies measuring suicidal ideation with 1 item were excluded.\r\n\r\nData Extraction and Synthesis\r\nPRISMA guidelines were followed. Summary data were extracted by 2 independent researchers and pooled using 3-level meta-analyses.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nHedges g was pooled for suicidal ideation and relative risk (RR) was pooled for suicide attempts.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf 15 006 studies identified, 147 comprising 193 comparisons and 11 001 participants were included. Direct and indirect psychotherapy conditions were associated with reduced suicidal ideation (direct: g, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.24; I2, 83.2; indirect: g, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.18; I2, 52.2). Direct and indirect psychotherapy conditions were also associated with reduced suicide attempts (direct: RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84; I2, 40.5; indirect: RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95; I2, 0). Sensitivity analyses largely confirmed these results.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nDirect and indirect interventions had similar effect sizes for reducing suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Suicide prevention strategies could make greater use of indirect treatments to provide effective interventions for people who would not likely seek treatment for suicidal ideation or self-harm.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2854","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts are debilitating mental health problems that are often treated with indirect psychotherapy (ie, psychotherapy that focuses on other mental health problems, such as depression or personality disorders). The effects of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicidal ideation have not yet been examined in a meta-analysis, and several trials have been published since a previous meta-analysis examined the effect size of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicide attempts. Objective To investigate the effect sizes of direct and indirect psychotherapy on suicidal ideation and the incidence of suicide attempts. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for articles published up until April 1, 2023. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy for any mental health problem, delivered in any setting, compared with any control group, and reporting suicidal ideation or suicide attempts were included. Studies measuring suicidal ideation with 1 item were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis PRISMA guidelines were followed. Summary data were extracted by 2 independent researchers and pooled using 3-level meta-analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures Hedges g was pooled for suicidal ideation and relative risk (RR) was pooled for suicide attempts. Results Of 15 006 studies identified, 147 comprising 193 comparisons and 11 001 participants were included. Direct and indirect psychotherapy conditions were associated with reduced suicidal ideation (direct: g, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.24; I2, 83.2; indirect: g, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.18; I2, 52.2). Direct and indirect psychotherapy conditions were also associated with reduced suicide attempts (direct: RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84; I2, 40.5; indirect: RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95; I2, 0). Sensitivity analyses largely confirmed these results. Conclusions and Relevance Direct and indirect interventions had similar effect sizes for reducing suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Suicide prevention strategies could make greater use of indirect treatments to provide effective interventions for people who would not likely seek treatment for suicidal ideation or self-harm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接或间接心理治疗后的自杀意念和自杀企图:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性自杀意念和自杀未遂是使人衰弱的心理健康问题,通常采用间接心理疗法(即针对抑郁症或人格障碍等其他心理健康问题的心理疗法)进行治疗。直接和间接心理疗法对自杀意念的影响尚未在一项荟萃分析中进行过研究,而且自从之前的一项荟萃分析研究了直接和间接心理疗法对自杀未遂的影响后,又发表了几项试验。目的 研究直接和间接心理疗法对自杀意念和自杀未遂发生率的影响大小。数据来源检索了PubMed、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials中截至2023年4月1日发表的文章。研究筛选纳入了针对任何心理健康问题、在任何环境下进行、与任何对照组进行比较、报告有自杀意念或自杀企图的心理治疗随机临床试验。数据提取与综合研究遵循PRISMA指南。由两名独立研究人员提取摘要数据,并采用3级元分析法进行汇总。主要结果和测量方法对自杀意念的Hedges g进行汇总,对自杀未遂的相对风险(RR)进行汇总。结果在确定的15 006项研究中,纳入了147项,包括193项比较和11 001名参与者。直接和间接心理治疗条件与自杀意念的减少有关(直接:g,-0.39;95% CI,-0.53 至 -0.24;I2,83.2;间接:g,-0.30;95% CI,-0.42 至 -0.18;I2,52.2)。直接和间接心理治疗条件也与自杀企图的减少有关(直接:RR,0.72;95% CI,-0.42 至-0.18;I2,52.2):RR,0.72;95% CI,0.62 至 0.84;I2,40.5;间接:RR,0.68;95% CI,0.48 至 0.95;I2,0)。结论与相关性直接和间接干预对减少自杀意念和自杀企图的效果大小相似。自杀预防策略可以更多地利用间接治疗,为那些不可能因自杀意念或自残而寻求治疗的人提供有效的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Neuroinflammation, Stress-Related Suicidal Ideation, and Negative Mood in Depression. Psychosis Spectrum Symptoms Before and After Adolescent Cannabis Use Initiation. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Fentanyl and Polysubstance Overdose Deaths. TikTok Challenges-Unintentional Injuries vs Suicide Attempts. Neighborhood Resources Associated With Psychological Trajectories and Neural Reactivity to Reward After Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1