Ten‐Year Follow‐Up of Oral Implants in Bone With Limited Bucco‐Oral Dimensions: A Prospective Case Series

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Periodontology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1111/jcpe.14063
M. Alami, N. Ntovas, G. Penne, W. Teughels, M. Quirynen, A. Castro, A. Temmerman
{"title":"Ten‐Year Follow‐Up of Oral Implants in Bone With Limited Bucco‐Oral Dimensions: A Prospective Case Series","authors":"M. Alami, N. Ntovas, G. Penne, W. Teughels, M. Quirynen, A. Castro, A. Temmerman","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundIt has been suggested that 1–2 mm of bone width at the buccal and lingual aspect is required for a successful long‐term implant outcome. Low levels of evidence support this minimum threshold of bone width. This prospective study aimed at evaluating the outcome of implants placed in alveolar ridges with limited bucco‐oral dimensions.Materials and MethodsOne‐hundred implants (dia. 3.5 mm) were placed in 28 patients with narrow alveolar ridge dimensions (<4.5 mm width) without augmentation procedures and conventionally loaded. Intra‐oral radiographs were taken at implant placement and abutment connection and at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years of follow‐up. At the 10‐year follow‐up (21 patients; 75 implants), full‐mouth periodontal charting was performed, and the peri‐implant keratinized tissue width and attachment type were recorded. Two calibrated periodontists analysed the peri‐implant bone changes.ResultsAfter 10 years, all implants showed successful osseointegration and a cumulative survival rate of 100%. The implants were placed 0.85 mm ± 0.89 mm subcrestally. After 10 years, the marginal bone was located 1.59 ± 2.11 mm apical to the implant shoulder. Throughout this period of follow‐up, the mean annual marginal bone loss was 0.094 mm. Furthermore, 84% of implants in 72% of patients presented with bleeding on probing.ConclusionAfter 10 years of functional loading, implants placed in alveolar ridges with limited bucco‐oral dimensions (≤4.5 mm) exhibited only minimum marginal bone loss.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIt has been suggested that 1–2 mm of bone width at the buccal and lingual aspect is required for a successful long‐term implant outcome. Low levels of evidence support this minimum threshold of bone width. This prospective study aimed at evaluating the outcome of implants placed in alveolar ridges with limited bucco‐oral dimensions.Materials and MethodsOne‐hundred implants (dia. 3.5 mm) were placed in 28 patients with narrow alveolar ridge dimensions (<4.5 mm width) without augmentation procedures and conventionally loaded. Intra‐oral radiographs were taken at implant placement and abutment connection and at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years of follow‐up. At the 10‐year follow‐up (21 patients; 75 implants), full‐mouth periodontal charting was performed, and the peri‐implant keratinized tissue width and attachment type were recorded. Two calibrated periodontists analysed the peri‐implant bone changes.ResultsAfter 10 years, all implants showed successful osseointegration and a cumulative survival rate of 100%. The implants were placed 0.85 mm ± 0.89 mm subcrestally. After 10 years, the marginal bone was located 1.59 ± 2.11 mm apical to the implant shoulder. Throughout this period of follow‐up, the mean annual marginal bone loss was 0.094 mm. Furthermore, 84% of implants in 72% of patients presented with bleeding on probing.ConclusionAfter 10 years of functional loading, implants placed in alveolar ridges with limited bucco‐oral dimensions (≤4.5 mm) exhibited only minimum marginal bone loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颊-口腔尺寸有限的骨内口腔种植体的十年随访:前瞻性病例系列
背景有人认为,要想获得成功的长期种植效果,颊侧和舌侧的骨宽度必须达到 1-2 毫米。支持这一最小骨宽度阈值的证据较少。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估在颊--口腔尺寸有限的牙槽脊上植入种植体的效果。材料和方法在 28 名牙槽脊尺寸狭窄(宽度为 4.5 毫米)的患者中植入了 100 个种植体(直径为 3.5 毫米),这些种植体没有经过扩增程序,采用传统方式植入。在植入种植体和基台连接处以及 1、2、3、5 和 10 年的随访期间拍摄了口腔内放射线照片。在 10 年的随访中(21 名患者;75 个种植体),进行了全口牙周制图,记录了种植体周围角化组织的宽度和附着类型。结果10年后,所有种植体均成功实现骨结合,累积存活率为100%。种植体植入胸骨下 0.85 毫米 ± 0.89 毫米。10 年后,边缘骨位于种植体肩部 1.59 ± 2.11 mm 的顶端。在整个随访期间,平均每年的边缘骨损失为 0.094 毫米。此外,72% 患者的 84% 种植体在探诊时有出血现象。结论经过 10 年的功能负荷后,在颊-口腔尺寸有限(≤4.5 毫米)的牙槽脊上植入的种植体仅表现出最低限度的边缘骨流失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Contrast-Enhanced Micro-CT Imaging of Murine Mandibles: A Multi-Method Approach for Simultaneous Hard and Soft Tissue Analysis. Periodontitis and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perceptions, Attitudes and Needs of Periodontitis Patients: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Ten‐Year Follow‐Up of Oral Implants in Bone With Limited Bucco‐Oral Dimensions: A Prospective Case Series Is Starch Intake Associated With Periodontal Status? An 11‐Year Longitudinal Analysis Among Finnish Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1