Development of a medication review intervention by seconding a hospital pharmacist to primary care

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100505
Sara Sommer Holst , Johanne Mølby Hansen , Susanne Kaae , Charlotte Vermehren
{"title":"Development of a medication review intervention by seconding a hospital pharmacist to primary care","authors":"Sara Sommer Holst ,&nbsp;Johanne Mølby Hansen ,&nbsp;Susanne Kaae ,&nbsp;Charlotte Vermehren","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medication reviews (MRs) are a well-described initiative that improves health outcomes for polypharmacy patients. However, there is limited knowledge about the performance of medication reviews carried out in general practice especially under the leadership of hospital clinical pharmacists. When developing complex interventions, such as MRs, it is essential to describe the development process to ensure transparency and avoid research waste.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Thus, this study aimed to describe the steps of developing a new MR intervention targeting general practice to ensure transparency and transferability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A stepwise approach inspired by the Medical Research Council framework was utilised in the process, covering two of the phases, i.e., development and feasibility, divided into four steps: 1) intervention drafting by a literature search, 2) expert opinion, 3) pilot testing in general practice clinics, and 4) evaluation of quantitative MR data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on the results from the first three steps, four main themes which influenced the success of the MR intervention were identified: general practitioner resources, patient involvement, implementation difficulties and interdisciplinarity. These themes guided the pilot evaluation in step four.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A new feasible, complex MR intervention utilising clinical pharmacists in general practice involving hospital clinical pharmacists in a real-life setting was developed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medication reviews (MRs) are a well-described initiative that improves health outcomes for polypharmacy patients. However, there is limited knowledge about the performance of medication reviews carried out in general practice especially under the leadership of hospital clinical pharmacists. When developing complex interventions, such as MRs, it is essential to describe the development process to ensure transparency and avoid research waste.

Objective

Thus, this study aimed to describe the steps of developing a new MR intervention targeting general practice to ensure transparency and transferability.

Methods

A stepwise approach inspired by the Medical Research Council framework was utilised in the process, covering two of the phases, i.e., development and feasibility, divided into four steps: 1) intervention drafting by a literature search, 2) expert opinion, 3) pilot testing in general practice clinics, and 4) evaluation of quantitative MR data.

Results

Based on the results from the first three steps, four main themes which influenced the success of the MR intervention were identified: general practitioner resources, patient involvement, implementation difficulties and interdisciplinarity. These themes guided the pilot evaluation in step four.

Conclusion

A new feasible, complex MR intervention utilising clinical pharmacists in general practice involving hospital clinical pharmacists in a real-life setting was developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过向基层医疗机构借调一名医院药剂师,制定药物审查干预措施
背景用药回顾(MRs)是一项可改善多药合用患者健康状况的措施,已得到了广泛应用。然而,人们对全科医生,尤其是在医院临床药师领导下开展的用药点评的绩效了解有限。因此,本研究旨在描述针对全科实践开发新的 MR 干预措施的步骤,以确保其透明度和可转让性。方法在此过程中采用了受医学研究委员会框架启发的循序渐进法,涵盖其中的两个阶段,即开发和可行性,分为四个步骤:结果根据前三个步骤的结果,确定了影响 MR 干预成功的四大主题:全科医生资源、患者参与、实施困难和跨学科性。这些主题为第四步的试点评估提供了指导。结论利用全科临床药师和医院临床药师在现实生活中开展了一项新的可行、复杂的 MR 干预活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of a community pharmacy cardiovascular practice transformation (CPT) program on blood pressure. Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature. Co-development of a community pharmacy training regarding fentanyl and xylazine test strips. Bridging gaps in medication therapy management at community health centers: A mixed-methods study on patient perceptions and pharmacists' preparedness. Assessing community antibiotic usage and adherence as per standard treatment guidelines: A potential area to enhance awareness at community pharmacy settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1