A potential model of national forest co-management: History of aspen management on the Leech Lake Reservation and Chippewa National Forest in Minnesota

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100679
Tyler S. Gifford , Michael J. Dockry , Douglas P. Thompson , John M. Zobel
{"title":"A potential model of national forest co-management: History of aspen management on the Leech Lake Reservation and Chippewa National Forest in Minnesota","authors":"Tyler S. Gifford ,&nbsp;Michael J. Dockry ,&nbsp;Douglas P. Thompson ,&nbsp;John M. Zobel","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aspen exists as the most abundant and industrially important forest type in contemporary Minnesota. Historically, the species was seen as economically undesirable yet saw prolific increases in abundance due to pine harvest and fire. The Leech Lake Reservation exists as a unique case study of tribal-U.S. Forest Service co-management, with 90 % of reservation land within Chippewa National Forest boundaries. This large geographical intersection was created by a series of American Indian law policies and makes the relationship between the Chippewa National Forest and the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe unique within the USDA National Forest System. Comparison of pre-reservation and more modern forest/land cover types within the modern-day boundaries of the Leech Lake Reservation were conducted alongside investigation of historical management authority documentation of Chippewa National Forest and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe cooperation and broader historical management of aspen in Minnesota. Results suggest historical power dynamics between the Chippewa National Forest and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe influenced decreasing pine and increasing aspen on the Leech Lake Reservation. However, the modern relationship between the Chippewa National Forest and the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe shows the potential for successful co-management within the shared goals of aspen management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspen exists as the most abundant and industrially important forest type in contemporary Minnesota. Historically, the species was seen as economically undesirable yet saw prolific increases in abundance due to pine harvest and fire. The Leech Lake Reservation exists as a unique case study of tribal-U.S. Forest Service co-management, with 90 % of reservation land within Chippewa National Forest boundaries. This large geographical intersection was created by a series of American Indian law policies and makes the relationship between the Chippewa National Forest and the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe unique within the USDA National Forest System. Comparison of pre-reservation and more modern forest/land cover types within the modern-day boundaries of the Leech Lake Reservation were conducted alongside investigation of historical management authority documentation of Chippewa National Forest and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe cooperation and broader historical management of aspen in Minnesota. Results suggest historical power dynamics between the Chippewa National Forest and Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe influenced decreasing pine and increasing aspen on the Leech Lake Reservation. However, the modern relationship between the Chippewa National Forest and the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe shows the potential for successful co-management within the shared goals of aspen management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家森林共同管理的潜在模式:明尼苏达州利奇湖保留地和奇佩瓦国家森林的杨树管理历史
杨树是当代明尼苏达州最丰富、在工业上最重要的森林类型。在历史上,该树种曾被视为经济上不受欢迎的树种,但由于松树的采伐和火灾,该树种的数量大幅增加。利奇湖保留地是部落与美国林务局共同管理的一个独特案例,90% 的保留地都在奇佩瓦国家森林公园的范围内。这一巨大的地理交叉点是由一系列美国印第安人法律政策造成的,使得奇佩瓦国家森林和利奇湖奥吉布韦部落之间的关系在美国农业部国家森林系统中独一无二。在对奇佩瓦国家森林公园和利奇湖奥吉布韦部落合作的历史管理权限文件以及明尼苏达州杨树的更广泛历史管理进行调查的同时,还对利奇湖保留地现代边界内的保留前和更现代的森林/土地覆被类型进行了比较。结果表明,奇佩瓦国家森林公园和利奇湖奥吉布韦部落之间的历史权力动态影响了利奇湖保留地松树的减少和杨树的增加。然而,奇佩瓦国家森林公园与利奇湖奥吉布韦部落之间的现代关系表明,在杨树管理的共同目标下,共同管理具有成功的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of land dynamics transformation into tea plantations using support vector machine One hundred years of piñon nuts, a largely forgotten wild food crop from the American Southwest (1850–1950) Special issue: Forest science navigating sustainable development—A third task Editorial: Fire and environment. Issues and challenges The impacts and legacies of warfare on forest ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1