An assessment of nutrient removal by harvesting constructed floating wetlands in two coastal lagoons in the SE Baltic Sea

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/eco.2682
Jūratė Lesutienė, Małgorzata Bielecka, Jolita Petkuvienė, Artūras Razinkovas-Baziukas
{"title":"An assessment of nutrient removal by harvesting constructed floating wetlands in two coastal lagoons in the SE Baltic Sea","authors":"Jūratė Lesutienė,&nbsp;Małgorzata Bielecka,&nbsp;Jolita Petkuvienė,&nbsp;Artūras Razinkovas-Baziukas","doi":"10.1002/eco.2682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last decades, so-called internal or sea-based mitigation measures have been suggested as nature-based solutions to remove nutrients and improve water quality in semi-enclosed coastal waters. However, these have rarely been tested in the field, especially in colder climates where winter ice cover is common. The aim of this experimental research was to investigate plant growth conditions in such an environment, as well to estimate nutrient removal capacity by harvesting constructed floating wetlands (CFWs). We tested small (24–28 m<sup>2</sup>) CFWs (Biomatrix®, Scotland, UK) at two demonstration sites: the Curonian lagoon (CL, Lithuania) and Szczecin lagoon (SL, Poland). In the CL, CFWs were planted predominantly with <i>Carex acutiformes</i> (Ehrh.), while the SL CFW was planted mainly with the reed <i>Phragmites australis</i> (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. We aimed to test the amount of nutrient removal by plant harvesting over three subsequent years (2019–2021). We investigated carbon storage capacity and plant nutrient stoichiometry as indicators of potential nutrient limitation in the brackish coastal waters. Plant biomass increased annually, stabilising at 2.5–3.7 kg wet weight m<sup>−2</sup>. The total nutrient uptake per installed island area varied with the plant species composition. In the successive years, the harvested plants from the CL CFW dominated by <i>Carex</i> accumulated 10.4–13.1 g N m<sup>−2</sup>, 0.6–0.8 g P m<sup>−2</sup> and 318–431 g C m<sup>−2</sup> per year. The harvest from the SL CFW dominated by <i>Phragmites</i> contained a two-times higher amount of nutrients, the respective figures being 21.2 g N m<sup>−2</sup>, 1.6 g P m<sup>−2</sup> and 704 g C m<sup>−2</sup>. The nutrient stoichiometry in the vegetation did not suggest the presence of sub-optimal growth conditions due to nitrogen limitation. However, the CL's dissolved nutrient supply was very low during the summer cyanobacteria bloom and indicated a severe nitrogen deficiency (as reflected in the dissolved inorganic nitrogen:dissolved inorganic phosphorus [DIN:DIP] molar ratio of 6). We suggest that to maximise nutrient removal capacity, tall plants with high biomass should be selected and/or plants with fine root systems to efficiently uptake the limiting nutrient from the water.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decades, so-called internal or sea-based mitigation measures have been suggested as nature-based solutions to remove nutrients and improve water quality in semi-enclosed coastal waters. However, these have rarely been tested in the field, especially in colder climates where winter ice cover is common. The aim of this experimental research was to investigate plant growth conditions in such an environment, as well to estimate nutrient removal capacity by harvesting constructed floating wetlands (CFWs). We tested small (24–28 m2) CFWs (Biomatrix®, Scotland, UK) at two demonstration sites: the Curonian lagoon (CL, Lithuania) and Szczecin lagoon (SL, Poland). In the CL, CFWs were planted predominantly with Carex acutiformes (Ehrh.), while the SL CFW was planted mainly with the reed Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. We aimed to test the amount of nutrient removal by plant harvesting over three subsequent years (2019–2021). We investigated carbon storage capacity and plant nutrient stoichiometry as indicators of potential nutrient limitation in the brackish coastal waters. Plant biomass increased annually, stabilising at 2.5–3.7 kg wet weight m−2. The total nutrient uptake per installed island area varied with the plant species composition. In the successive years, the harvested plants from the CL CFW dominated by Carex accumulated 10.4–13.1 g N m−2, 0.6–0.8 g P m−2 and 318–431 g C m−2 per year. The harvest from the SL CFW dominated by Phragmites contained a two-times higher amount of nutrients, the respective figures being 21.2 g N m−2, 1.6 g P m−2 and 704 g C m−2. The nutrient stoichiometry in the vegetation did not suggest the presence of sub-optimal growth conditions due to nitrogen limitation. However, the CL's dissolved nutrient supply was very low during the summer cyanobacteria bloom and indicated a severe nitrogen deficiency (as reflected in the dissolved inorganic nitrogen:dissolved inorganic phosphorus [DIN:DIP] molar ratio of 6). We suggest that to maximise nutrient removal capacity, tall plants with high biomass should be selected and/or plants with fine root systems to efficiently uptake the limiting nutrient from the water.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对波罗的海东南部两个沿海泻湖通过收获建造浮动湿地去除营养物质的评估
在过去的几十年里,人们提出了所谓的内部或海基减缓措施,作为基于自然的解 决方案,用于去除营养物质和改善半封闭沿岸水域的水质。然而,这些措施很少经过实地测试,尤其是在冬季常有冰雪覆盖的寒冷气候中。这项实验研究的目的是调查植物在这种环境中的生长条件,并通过收割建造的浮动湿地(CFW)来估计营养物质的去除能力。我们在两个示范点测试了小型(24-28 平方米)CFW(Biomatrix®,英国苏格兰):库伦泻湖(CL,立陶宛)和什切青泻湖(SL,波兰)。在库伦泻湖,CFWs 主要种植的是薹草(Carex acutiformes (Ehrh.)),而在什切青泻湖,CFWs 主要种植的是芦苇 Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin.我们的目标是测试植物收割在随后三年(2019-2021 年)中的养分去除量。我们研究了碳储存能力和植物养分化学计量,以此作为咸水沿岸水域潜在养分限制的指标。植物生物量逐年增加,稳定在 2.5-3.7 千克湿重 m-2 的水平。每个岛屿的总养分吸收量随植物物种组成而变化。在连续几年中,从以薹草为主的 CL CFW 收获的植物每年积累 10.4-13.1 克 N m-2、0.6-0.8 克 P m-2 和 318-431 克 C m-2。而以葭藻为主的 SL CFW 的收获物所含养分则高出两倍,分别为 21.2 克 N m-2、1.6 克 P m-2 和 704 克 C m-2。植被中的养分化学计量并不表明存在因氮限制而导致的次优生长条件。然而,在夏季蓝藻藻华期间,CL 的溶解养分供应量非常低,表明严重缺氮(溶解无机氮:溶解无机磷[DIN:DIP]摩尔比为 6)。我们建议,为了最大限度地提高养分去除能力,应选择生物量高的高大植物和/或根系细密的植物,以便从水中有效吸收限制性养分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Temperature-driven convergence and divergence of ecohydrological dynamics in the ecosystems of a sky island mountain range Issue Information Soil Building and Capillary Barrier–Enhanced Water Availability Help Explain Pisonia grandis and Other Atoll Native's Tolerance for Variable Precipitation Regimes Analysis of Research Hot Spots in Chinese and International English Ecohydrological Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1