‘Leaving the Door Open’: Perspectives on Decision-Making for Non-Emergency Diabetes-Related Amputation

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1111/hex.70043
Emilee Kim Ming Ong, Carolyn Murray, Susan Hillier, Ryan Causby
{"title":"‘Leaving the Door Open’: Perspectives on Decision-Making for Non-Emergency Diabetes-Related Amputation","authors":"Emilee Kim Ming Ong,&nbsp;Carolyn Murray,&nbsp;Susan Hillier,&nbsp;Ryan Causby","doi":"10.1111/hex.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Having a lower extremity amputation is a life-changing decision for people living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer. Although previous research has described both positive and negative lifestyle and function outcomes of diabetes-related amputations, limited research has been conducted on the decision-making processes leading up to the amputation. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of persons, healthcare practitioners and experts (including academics and specialists) on decision-making for people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer who may require a non-emergency amputation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews enabled people to share their thought processes when making decisions for amputation. Twenty-six participants were interviewed, including nine people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer or amputation, nine health practitioners and eight experts located across five countries. There were 13 female and 13 male participants. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes described the decision-making considerations for amputation: ‘Balancing the evidence in decision-making’, ‘Trust, respect and timing of conversations inform decision-making’, ‘Tailoring decisions for individual circumstance’ and ‘Reaching the tipping point in decisions for the future’. Work commitments, functional and lifestyle impacts of amputation, the presence of support networks and clinical wound features formed the evidence for a decision for amputation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding quality of life needs ensured that decisions for amputation addressed expectations and lifestyle needs. Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer presented daily challenges that pushed people to a tipping point, at which amputation was considered to overcome these hardships and enable them to move on to the next chapter of their life. Further research is required to understand how person-centred factors can be better incorporated alongside objective clinical assessments in decisions for amputation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>People with diabetes-related foot ulcers, health practitioners and experts shared their perspectives on the decision-making process for amputation through one-to-one interviews. Consideration of the person in the context of their life, environment and personal needs alongside the pathological factors is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Having a lower extremity amputation is a life-changing decision for people living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer. Although previous research has described both positive and negative lifestyle and function outcomes of diabetes-related amputations, limited research has been conducted on the decision-making processes leading up to the amputation. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of persons, healthcare practitioners and experts (including academics and specialists) on decision-making for people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer who may require a non-emergency amputation.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews enabled people to share their thought processes when making decisions for amputation. Twenty-six participants were interviewed, including nine people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer or amputation, nine health practitioners and eight experts located across five countries. There were 13 female and 13 male participants. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis.

Results

Four themes described the decision-making considerations for amputation: ‘Balancing the evidence in decision-making’, ‘Trust, respect and timing of conversations inform decision-making’, ‘Tailoring decisions for individual circumstance’ and ‘Reaching the tipping point in decisions for the future’. Work commitments, functional and lifestyle impacts of amputation, the presence of support networks and clinical wound features formed the evidence for a decision for amputation.

Conclusion

Understanding quality of life needs ensured that decisions for amputation addressed expectations and lifestyle needs. Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer presented daily challenges that pushed people to a tipping point, at which amputation was considered to overcome these hardships and enable them to move on to the next chapter of their life. Further research is required to understand how person-centred factors can be better incorporated alongside objective clinical assessments in decisions for amputation.

Patient or Public Contribution

People with diabetes-related foot ulcers, health practitioners and experts shared their perspectives on the decision-making process for amputation through one-to-one interviews. Consideration of the person in the context of their life, environment and personal needs alongside the pathological factors is warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让门敞开":关于非急诊糖尿病相关截肢决策的观点
导言:对于糖尿病足溃疡患者来说,下肢截肢是一个改变生活的决定。尽管之前的研究已经描述了糖尿病相关截肢对生活方式和功能造成的积极和消极影响,但对截肢前的决策过程的研究却十分有限。本研究旨在探讨糖尿病足溃疡患者、医护人员和专家(包括学者和专家)对可能需要进行非急诊截肢的决策过程的看法。 方法 采用半结构式访谈进行定性描述研究,使人们能够分享他们在做出截肢决定时的思维过程。26 名参与者接受了访谈,其中包括 9 名糖尿病足溃疡或截肢患者、9 名医疗从业人员和 8 名专家,他们分布在 5 个国家。其中有 13 名女性和 13 名男性参与者。数据分析采用了主题分析法。 结果 四个主题描述了截肢决策的考虑因素:"在决策中平衡证据"、"信任、尊重和对话的时机为决策提供依据"、"根据个人情况制定决策 "和 "达到未来决策的临界点"。工作承诺、截肢对功能和生活方式的影响、支持网络的存在以及临床伤口特征构成了决定截肢的证据。 结论 了解生活质量需求可确保截肢决定符合期望和生活方式需求。与糖尿病相关的足部溃疡给患者的日常生活带来了挑战,这些挑战将患者推向了一个临界点,在这个临界点上,人们考虑截肢来克服这些困难,使他们能够迈向生活的下一个篇章。我们需要进一步研究,以了解在做出截肢决定时,如何将以人为本的因素与客观的临床评估更好地结合起来。 患者或公众贡献 通过一对一访谈,糖尿病足溃疡患者、医疗从业人员和专家分享了他们对截肢决策过程的看法。在考虑病理因素的同时,还应考虑患者的生活、环境和个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Patients and Members of the Public Contributing to Rapid Health Technology Assessments for NICE: A Qualitative Study. 'The Letter Says I May or May Not Be Eligible… It Is a Big Doubt and Frustrating:' A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Children's Oral Healthcare From the Perspective of Karen Refugee Parents in Victoria. Cultural Humility in Action: Learning From Refugee and Migrant Women and Healthcare Providers to Improve Maternal Health Services in Australia. Identifying Key Moments in Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of People With Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetes Health Coaches. 'Motivating Implicit Chinese to Express Themselves Is the Biggest Barrier': A Qualitative Study of Chinese Researchers' Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Patient Engagement in Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1