Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1111/anae.16383
Ruaraidh A. S. Campbell, Tharusan Thevathasan, Danny J. N. Wong, Andrew M. Wilson, Helen A. Lindsay, Douglas Campbell, Scott Popham, Lisa M. Barneto, Paul S. Myles, S. Ramani Moonesinghe, SNAP-2: EPICCS collaborators, Steve K. Harris
{"title":"Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study","authors":"Ruaraidh A. S. Campbell,&nbsp;Tharusan Thevathasan,&nbsp;Danny J. N. Wong,&nbsp;Andrew M. Wilson,&nbsp;Helen A. Lindsay,&nbsp;Douglas Campbell,&nbsp;Scott Popham,&nbsp;Lisa M. Barneto,&nbsp;Paul S. Myles,&nbsp;S. Ramani Moonesinghe,&nbsp;SNAP-2: EPICCS collaborators,&nbsp;Steve K. Harris","doi":"10.1111/anae.16383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Critical care beds are a limited resource, yet research indicates that recommendations for postoperative critical care admission based on patient-level risk stratification are not followed. It is unclear how prioritisation decisions are made in real-world settings and the effect of this prioritisation on outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prespecified analysis of an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery, conducted in 274 hospitals across the UK and Australasia during 2017. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity at day 7. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between critical care admission and patient and health system factors. The causal effect of critical care admission on outcome was estimated using variation in critical care occupancy as a natural experiment in an instrumental variable analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 19,491 patients from 248 hospitals were eligible for analysis, of whom 2107 were directly admitted to critical care postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 2829/19,491 (15%) patients. Increasing surgical risk was associated with critical care admission, as was increased availability of critical care beds (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.06), p = 0.002) per available bed; however, the probability of admission varied significantly between hospitals (median odds ratio 3.05). There was no evidence of a difference in postoperative morbidity with critical care admission (odds ratio (95%CI) 0.91 (0.57–1.45), p = 0.710).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Postoperative critical care admission is variable and related to bed availability. Statistical methods that adjust for unobserved confounding lowered the estimates of harm previously reported to have been associated with postoperative critical care admission. Our findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial which would evaluate any potential benefits for postoperative critical care admission for patients in whom there is no absolute indication for admission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"79 11","pages":"1165-1179"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16383","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Critical care beds are a limited resource, yet research indicates that recommendations for postoperative critical care admission based on patient-level risk stratification are not followed. It is unclear how prioritisation decisions are made in real-world settings and the effect of this prioritisation on outcomes.

Methods

This was a prespecified analysis of an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery, conducted in 274 hospitals across the UK and Australasia during 2017. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity at day 7. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between critical care admission and patient and health system factors. The causal effect of critical care admission on outcome was estimated using variation in critical care occupancy as a natural experiment in an instrumental variable analysis.

Results

A total of 19,491 patients from 248 hospitals were eligible for analysis, of whom 2107 were directly admitted to critical care postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 2829/19,491 (15%) patients. Increasing surgical risk was associated with critical care admission, as was increased availability of critical care beds (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.06), p = 0.002) per available bed; however, the probability of admission varied significantly between hospitals (median odds ratio 3.05). There was no evidence of a difference in postoperative morbidity with critical care admission (odds ratio (95%CI) 0.91 (0.57–1.45), p = 0.710).

Discussion

Postoperative critical care admission is variable and related to bed availability. Statistical methods that adjust for unobserved confounding lowered the estimates of harm previously reported to have been associated with postoperative critical care admission. Our findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial which would evaluate any potential benefits for postoperative critical care admission for patients in whom there is no absolute indication for admission.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房床位供应与术后效果:一项多国队列研究
重症监护床位是一种有限的资源,但研究表明,基于患者风险分层的术后重症监护入院建议并未得到遵循。目前还不清楚在现实世界中如何决定优先顺序,以及这种优先顺序对治疗效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Breaking barriers: achieving equitable access to postoperative critical care Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block ‘Flextension’: a new term to describe optimal head and neck positioning for airway management Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate for general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial Evaluating tracheal intubation ergonomics: practitioner experience and laryngoscope type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1