Angie Price , Hannah Simmons , Emily Gehring , Lauren Davis , Gwyneth Fischer , Ann R. Klipsch , Erin Richmond , Janice E. Sullivan , Steven J. Steiner
{"title":"Significant delays exist in industry-sponsored pediatric clinical drug trial start-up and enrollment processes","authors":"Angie Price , Hannah Simmons , Emily Gehring , Lauren Davis , Gwyneth Fischer , Ann R. Klipsch , Erin Richmond , Janice E. Sullivan , Steven J. Steiner","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Significant barriers to advancing pediatric drug development continue despite federal incentives to expedite pediatric drug development. There is an urgent need to improve how clinical trials are designed, implemented, and conducted to increase the number of approved therapeutic interventions for children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Pediatric Improvement Collaborative for Clinical Trials & Research was created to measure timelines and address delays in the pediatric clinical trials process. This multi-site collaborative prospectively monitored sixteen time points in industry-sponsored pediatric clinical drug trials, including times to budget approval, contract execution, ancillary protocol review, Institutional Review Board approval, Site Initiation Visit, and first patient consented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-four sites contributed data on 330 industry-sponsored pediatric drug studies. The average duration to final study budget approval was 121 (range 3–585) days, to final study Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was 51 (range 1–205) days, to Site Initiation Visit was 204 (range 23–600) days, and to first patient consented was 239 (range 30–534) days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant study start-up delays were noted in industry-sponsored clinical drug trials among a large group of pediatric sites. Delays and wide variation in all steps of the study process indicate multiple opportunities for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 107701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Significant barriers to advancing pediatric drug development continue despite federal incentives to expedite pediatric drug development. There is an urgent need to improve how clinical trials are designed, implemented, and conducted to increase the number of approved therapeutic interventions for children.
Methods
The Pediatric Improvement Collaborative for Clinical Trials & Research was created to measure timelines and address delays in the pediatric clinical trials process. This multi-site collaborative prospectively monitored sixteen time points in industry-sponsored pediatric clinical drug trials, including times to budget approval, contract execution, ancillary protocol review, Institutional Review Board approval, Site Initiation Visit, and first patient consented.
Results
Twenty-four sites contributed data on 330 industry-sponsored pediatric drug studies. The average duration to final study budget approval was 121 (range 3–585) days, to final study Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was 51 (range 1–205) days, to Site Initiation Visit was 204 (range 23–600) days, and to first patient consented was 239 (range 30–534) days.
Conclusion
Significant study start-up delays were noted in industry-sponsored clinical drug trials among a large group of pediatric sites. Delays and wide variation in all steps of the study process indicate multiple opportunities for improvement.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.