Comparison of the accuracy of minimally invasive techniques (cytology, cell block, immunocytochemistry and clonality assay) in the diagnosis of canine multicentric lymphoma

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105420
Pâmela Cristina Lopes Gurgel Valente , Maria Conceição Peleteiro , Hugo Pissarra , Gonçalo Vicente , Jorge Correia , Constança Pomba , António Duarte
{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of minimally invasive techniques (cytology, cell block, immunocytochemistry and clonality assay) in the diagnosis of canine multicentric lymphoma","authors":"Pâmela Cristina Lopes Gurgel Valente ,&nbsp;Maria Conceição Peleteiro ,&nbsp;Hugo Pissarra ,&nbsp;Gonçalo Vicente ,&nbsp;Jorge Correia ,&nbsp;Constança Pomba ,&nbsp;António Duarte","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lymphoma ranks among the most prevalent neoplasms in veterinary oncology, frequently diagnosed in dogs, particularly in its multicentric form. While histopathology plays a crucial role in lymphoma diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of biological behavior, minimally invasive diagnostic methods are increasingly emerging as viable alternatives. This study aims to assess and compare various minimally invasive diagnostic techniques for multicentric lymphomas in dogs. A total of 38 dogs, encompassing various sexes, ages, and breeds, with clinical suspicion of multicentric lymphoma, was included in the study. Fine needle aspiration was employed to collect samples from lymph nodes, which were subsequently used for cytology, cell block preparation, PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement (PARR), and immunocytochemistry. Among the animals evaluated, 31 dogs received a cytological diagnosis of lymphoma, while 7 showed findings suggestive of lymphoma or lymphadenitis. Immunocytochemistry on cytological smears yielded inconclusive results in 50 % of cases, with 44.74 % diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma and 5.26 % with T-cell lymphoma. Cell block analysis identified lymphoma in 30 dogs and suggested lymphoma or a round cell neoplasm in 8 cases. Cell block immunocytochemistry confirmed lymphoma in 35 dogs, comprising 80 % B-cell and 20 % T-cell lymphomas. PARR revealed monoclonal rearrangement/clonality in 33 cases, with 84.85 % of these being B-cell and 15.15 % T-cell lymphomas. This study underscores the precision of minimally invasive techniques in diagnosing and characterizing multicentric lymphoma in dogs, reaffirming their significance in veterinary clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882400287X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lymphoma ranks among the most prevalent neoplasms in veterinary oncology, frequently diagnosed in dogs, particularly in its multicentric form. While histopathology plays a crucial role in lymphoma diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of biological behavior, minimally invasive diagnostic methods are increasingly emerging as viable alternatives. This study aims to assess and compare various minimally invasive diagnostic techniques for multicentric lymphomas in dogs. A total of 38 dogs, encompassing various sexes, ages, and breeds, with clinical suspicion of multicentric lymphoma, was included in the study. Fine needle aspiration was employed to collect samples from lymph nodes, which were subsequently used for cytology, cell block preparation, PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement (PARR), and immunocytochemistry. Among the animals evaluated, 31 dogs received a cytological diagnosis of lymphoma, while 7 showed findings suggestive of lymphoma or lymphadenitis. Immunocytochemistry on cytological smears yielded inconclusive results in 50 % of cases, with 44.74 % diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma and 5.26 % with T-cell lymphoma. Cell block analysis identified lymphoma in 30 dogs and suggested lymphoma or a round cell neoplasm in 8 cases. Cell block immunocytochemistry confirmed lymphoma in 35 dogs, comprising 80 % B-cell and 20 % T-cell lymphomas. PARR revealed monoclonal rearrangement/clonality in 33 cases, with 84.85 % of these being B-cell and 15.15 % T-cell lymphomas. This study underscores the precision of minimally invasive techniques in diagnosing and characterizing multicentric lymphoma in dogs, reaffirming their significance in veterinary clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较微创技术(细胞学、细胞块、免疫细胞化学和克隆性测定)在犬多中心淋巴瘤诊断中的准确性
淋巴瘤是兽医肿瘤学中最常见的肿瘤之一,经常在狗身上诊断出来,尤其是多中心型淋巴瘤。虽然组织病理学在淋巴瘤诊断、预后和生物学行为预测中起着至关重要的作用,但微创诊断方法正日益成为可行的替代方法。本研究旨在评估和比较针对犬多中心淋巴瘤的各种微创诊断技术。本研究共纳入 38 只临床怀疑患有多中心淋巴瘤的狗,这些狗的性别、年龄和品种各不相同。研究人员采用细针穿刺法采集淋巴结样本,随后对样本进行细胞学检查、细胞块制备、抗原受体重排(PARR)PCR检测和免疫细胞化学分析。在接受评估的动物中,31 只狗经细胞学诊断为淋巴瘤,7 只狗的检查结果提示淋巴瘤或淋巴结炎。50%的病例细胞涂片免疫细胞化学结果不确定,44.74%被诊断为B细胞淋巴瘤,5.26%被诊断为T细胞淋巴瘤。细胞块分析发现 30 只狗患有淋巴瘤,8 只狗患有淋巴瘤或圆形细胞肿瘤。细胞块免疫细胞化学证实 35 只狗患有淋巴瘤,其中 80% 为 B 细胞淋巴瘤,20% 为 T 细胞淋巴瘤。PARR显示有33例单克隆重排/克隆,其中84.85%为B细胞淋巴瘤,15.15%为T细胞淋巴瘤。这项研究强调了微创技术在诊断和鉴定犬多中心淋巴瘤方面的精确性,再次证明了微创技术在兽医临床实践中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of surfactant apoproteins and Brucella sp. antigens in the lungs of aborted bovine fetuses and neonatal calves delivered weak Incidence of puerperal metritis and associated risk factors in dairy cows in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia Treatment modalities for claw horn lesions and their effects on locomotion scores, gait properties, lesion progression, and nociceptive threshold in dairy cows: A systematic review Efficiency of infrared pyrometer and infrared thermography for assessing body surface temperature in hair sheep Anethole improves mitochondrial activity and quality parameters in fresh and frozen-thawed ovine semen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1