Comparison of the accuracy of minimally invasive techniques (cytology, cell block, immunocytochemistry and clonality assay) in the diagnosis of canine multicentric lymphoma
{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of minimally invasive techniques (cytology, cell block, immunocytochemistry and clonality assay) in the diagnosis of canine multicentric lymphoma","authors":"Pâmela Cristina Lopes Gurgel Valente , Maria Conceição Peleteiro , Hugo Pissarra , Gonçalo Vicente , Jorge Correia , Constança Pomba , António Duarte","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lymphoma ranks among the most prevalent neoplasms in veterinary oncology, frequently diagnosed in dogs, particularly in its multicentric form. While histopathology plays a crucial role in lymphoma diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of biological behavior, minimally invasive diagnostic methods are increasingly emerging as viable alternatives. This study aims to assess and compare various minimally invasive diagnostic techniques for multicentric lymphomas in dogs. A total of 38 dogs, encompassing various sexes, ages, and breeds, with clinical suspicion of multicentric lymphoma, was included in the study. Fine needle aspiration was employed to collect samples from lymph nodes, which were subsequently used for cytology, cell block preparation, PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement (PARR), and immunocytochemistry. Among the animals evaluated, 31 dogs received a cytological diagnosis of lymphoma, while 7 showed findings suggestive of lymphoma or lymphadenitis. Immunocytochemistry on cytological smears yielded inconclusive results in 50 % of cases, with 44.74 % diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma and 5.26 % with T-cell lymphoma. Cell block analysis identified lymphoma in 30 dogs and suggested lymphoma or a round cell neoplasm in 8 cases. Cell block immunocytochemistry confirmed lymphoma in 35 dogs, comprising 80 % B-cell and 20 % T-cell lymphomas. PARR revealed monoclonal rearrangement/clonality in 33 cases, with 84.85 % of these being B-cell and 15.15 % T-cell lymphomas. This study underscores the precision of minimally invasive techniques in diagnosing and characterizing multicentric lymphoma in dogs, reaffirming their significance in veterinary clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882400287X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lymphoma ranks among the most prevalent neoplasms in veterinary oncology, frequently diagnosed in dogs, particularly in its multicentric form. While histopathology plays a crucial role in lymphoma diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of biological behavior, minimally invasive diagnostic methods are increasingly emerging as viable alternatives. This study aims to assess and compare various minimally invasive diagnostic techniques for multicentric lymphomas in dogs. A total of 38 dogs, encompassing various sexes, ages, and breeds, with clinical suspicion of multicentric lymphoma, was included in the study. Fine needle aspiration was employed to collect samples from lymph nodes, which were subsequently used for cytology, cell block preparation, PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement (PARR), and immunocytochemistry. Among the animals evaluated, 31 dogs received a cytological diagnosis of lymphoma, while 7 showed findings suggestive of lymphoma or lymphadenitis. Immunocytochemistry on cytological smears yielded inconclusive results in 50 % of cases, with 44.74 % diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma and 5.26 % with T-cell lymphoma. Cell block analysis identified lymphoma in 30 dogs and suggested lymphoma or a round cell neoplasm in 8 cases. Cell block immunocytochemistry confirmed lymphoma in 35 dogs, comprising 80 % B-cell and 20 % T-cell lymphomas. PARR revealed monoclonal rearrangement/clonality in 33 cases, with 84.85 % of these being B-cell and 15.15 % T-cell lymphomas. This study underscores the precision of minimally invasive techniques in diagnosing and characterizing multicentric lymphoma in dogs, reaffirming their significance in veterinary clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.