A Simple Finite-Time Analysis of TD Learning With Linear Function Approximation

IF 7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1109/TAC.2024.3469328
Aritra Mitra
{"title":"A Simple Finite-Time Analysis of TD Learning With Linear Function Approximation","authors":"Aritra Mitra","doi":"10.1109/TAC.2024.3469328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the finite-time convergence of temporal-difference (TD) learning with linear function approximation under Markovian sampling. Existing proofs for this setting either assume a projection step in the algorithm to simplify the analysis, or require a fairly intricate argument to ensure stability of the iterates. We ask: <italic>Is it possible to retain the simplicity of a projection-based analysis without actually performing a projection step in the algorithm?</i> Our main contribution is to show this is possible via a novel two-step argument. In the first step, we use induction to prove that under a standard choice of a constant step-size <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\alpha$</tex-math></inline-formula>, the iterates generated by TD learning remain uniformly bounded in expectation. In the second step, we establish a recursion that mimics the steady-state dynamics of TD learning up to a bounded perturbation on the order of <inline-formula><tex-math>$O(\\alpha ^{2})$</tex-math></inline-formula> that captures the effect of Markovian sampling. Combining these pieces leads to an overall approach that considerably simplifies existing proofs. We conjecture that our inductive proof technique will find applications in the analyses of more complex stochastic approximation algorithms, and conclude by providing some examples of such applications.","PeriodicalId":13201,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","volume":"70 2","pages":"1388-1394"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10697283/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the finite-time convergence of temporal-difference (TD) learning with linear function approximation under Markovian sampling. Existing proofs for this setting either assume a projection step in the algorithm to simplify the analysis, or require a fairly intricate argument to ensure stability of the iterates. We ask: Is it possible to retain the simplicity of a projection-based analysis without actually performing a projection step in the algorithm? Our main contribution is to show this is possible via a novel two-step argument. In the first step, we use induction to prove that under a standard choice of a constant step-size $\alpha$, the iterates generated by TD learning remain uniformly bounded in expectation. In the second step, we establish a recursion that mimics the steady-state dynamics of TD learning up to a bounded perturbation on the order of $O(\alpha ^{2})$ that captures the effect of Markovian sampling. Combining these pieces leads to an overall approach that considerably simplifies existing proofs. We conjecture that our inductive proof technique will find applications in the analyses of more complex stochastic approximation algorithms, and conclude by providing some examples of such applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用线性函数逼近进行 TD 学习的简单有限时间分析
研究了马尔可夫抽样下线性函数逼近的时差分学习的有限时间收敛性。这种设置的现有证明要么假设算法中的一个投影步骤来简化分析,要么需要一个相当复杂的参数来确保迭代的稳定性。我们的问题是:在不实际执行算法中的投影步骤的情况下,是否有可能保留基于投影的分析的简单性?我们的主要贡献是通过一个新颖的两步论证来证明这是可能的。在第一步中,我们使用归纳法证明了在一个常数步长$\alpha$的标准选择下,由TD学习生成的迭代在期望上保持一致有界。在第二步中,我们建立了一个递归,它模拟了TD学习的稳态动力学,直到O(\alpha ^{2})阶的有界扰动,该扰动捕获了马尔可夫采样的影响。将这些部分结合起来,就形成了一种总体方法,大大简化了现有的证明。我们推测,我们的归纳证明技术将在更复杂的随机逼近算法的分析中找到应用,并通过提供一些此类应用的例子来结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
824
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: In the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, the IEEE Control Systems Society publishes high-quality papers on the theory, design, and applications of control engineering. Two types of contributions are regularly considered: 1) Papers: Presentation of significant research, development, or application of control concepts. 2) Technical Notes and Correspondence: Brief technical notes, comments on published areas or established control topics, corrections to papers and notes published in the Transactions. In addition, special papers (tutorials, surveys, and perspectives on the theory and applications of control systems topics) are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Safety-Constrained Control with Tunable Performance Using Dual-Mode Method and Local Trajectory Adjustment Communication-Efficient Stochastic Distributed Learning Benign Nonconvex Landscapes in Optimal and Robust Control, Part I: Global Optimality Benign Nonconvex Landscapes in Optimal and Robust Control, Part II: Extended Convex Lifting Least-squares model-reference adaptive control: extension to higher relative degree plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1