Lessons learned from Dread darknet communities: How and why are fraudsters targeting the elderly to be victims or accomplices?

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminology & Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12684
Kenji Logie, Sumita Das
{"title":"Lessons learned from Dread darknet communities: How and why are fraudsters targeting the elderly to be victims or accomplices?","authors":"Kenji Logie, Sumita Das","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryWe examined darknet user discussions on the Dread forum to identify key themes and emerging topics in fraud planning, focusing additionally on elderly victimization. Using the conceptual framework of criminogenic learning to study the process of fraud planning in darknet communities of practice, we analyzed the content of original user posts (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 818) and comments (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1365) collected from the Dread forum. We identified nine unique fraud categories, of which payments‐related fraud was the most‐discussed fraud category and accounted for 25% of original user posts. We further found our sampled forum content to be dominated by the theme of learning or knowledge sharing in eight of the nine fraud categories, which appeared in more than 44% of original user posts. Our content analysis revealed specific insights into why and how darknet forum users may target people, including the elderly subpopulation, for different types of fraud. Overall, our research demonstrates the diversity of opinion and knowledge sharing among darknet forum users in relation to planning and committing fraud against the elderly, views on who is a suitable target and why, and what veteran and aspiring fraudsters consider to be important information for success in fraud.Policy ImplicationsUtilized independently or as part of a multistage strategy of darknet data analysis, our research method can be used to monitor criminally active darknet forums for current and emerging themes in fraud against general populations and vulnerable subpopulations, such as the elderly, and to develop strategies to identify, disrupt, or destroy hubs of criminal planning and knowledge sharing. Our study additionally informs policy makers of certain elder‐specific vulnerabilities that might be addressed by more up‐to‐date elder cybercrime awareness campaigns and initiatives. Our findings also highlight the presence of insider threats that may inform discussions on how health and financial institutions can better regulate these cybersecurity risks.","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryWe examined darknet user discussions on the Dread forum to identify key themes and emerging topics in fraud planning, focusing additionally on elderly victimization. Using the conceptual framework of criminogenic learning to study the process of fraud planning in darknet communities of practice, we analyzed the content of original user posts (n = 818) and comments (n = 1365) collected from the Dread forum. We identified nine unique fraud categories, of which payments‐related fraud was the most‐discussed fraud category and accounted for 25% of original user posts. We further found our sampled forum content to be dominated by the theme of learning or knowledge sharing in eight of the nine fraud categories, which appeared in more than 44% of original user posts. Our content analysis revealed specific insights into why and how darknet forum users may target people, including the elderly subpopulation, for different types of fraud. Overall, our research demonstrates the diversity of opinion and knowledge sharing among darknet forum users in relation to planning and committing fraud against the elderly, views on who is a suitable target and why, and what veteran and aspiring fraudsters consider to be important information for success in fraud.Policy ImplicationsUtilized independently or as part of a multistage strategy of darknet data analysis, our research method can be used to monitor criminally active darknet forums for current and emerging themes in fraud against general populations and vulnerable subpopulations, such as the elderly, and to develop strategies to identify, disrupt, or destroy hubs of criminal planning and knowledge sharing. Our study additionally informs policy makers of certain elder‐specific vulnerabilities that might be addressed by more up‐to‐date elder cybercrime awareness campaigns and initiatives. Our findings also highlight the presence of insider threats that may inform discussions on how health and financial institutions can better regulate these cybersecurity risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 Dread darknet 社区吸取的经验教训:欺诈者如何以及为何将老年人作为受害者或帮凶?
研究摘要我们研究了暗网用户在 "恐惧 "论坛上的讨论,以确定欺诈计划中的关键主题和新出现的话题,并将重点放在老年人受害问题上。我们使用犯罪诱因学习的概念框架来研究暗网实践社区中的欺诈策划过程,分析了从 Dread 论坛收集的原始用户帖子(n = 818)和评论(n = 1365)的内容。我们确定了九种独特的欺诈类别,其中与支付相关的欺诈是讨论最多的欺诈类别,占用户原创帖子的 25%。我们还发现,在九个欺诈类别中,有八个类别的论坛内容以学习或知识共享为主题,占用户原创帖子的 44% 以上。我们的内容分析揭示了暗网论坛用户为何以及如何针对包括老年人在内的人群实施不同类型欺诈的具体原因。总体而言,我们的研究表明,暗网论坛用户在计划和实施针对老年人的欺诈行为、对谁是合适的目标和为什么是合适的目标的看法,以及资深欺诈者和有抱负的欺诈者认为哪些信息是欺诈成功的重要信息等方面存在意见和知识共享的多样性。政策启示独立使用或作为暗网数据分析多阶段策略的一部分,我们的研究方法可用于监控犯罪活动活跃的暗网论坛,以了解针对普通人群和老年人等弱势亚人群的欺诈中当前和新出现的主题,并制定策略以识别、瓦解或摧毁犯罪策划和知识共享中心。我们的研究还为政策制定者提供了信息,使他们了解到某些老年人特有的弱点,这些弱点可以通过更多最新的老年人网络犯罪宣传活动和倡议来解决。我们的研究结果还突显了内部威胁的存在,可为讨论卫生和金融机构如何更好地监管这些网络安全风险提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
期刊最新文献
Short‐term evaluation of Cure Violence St. Louis: Challenges, triumphs, and lessons learned Situational crime prevention as a harm mitigation policy for active shooter incidents Locked up and awaiting trial: Testing the criminogenic and punitive effects of spending a week or more in pretrial detention Lessons learned from Dread darknet communities: How and why are fraudsters targeting the elderly to be victims or accomplices? Direct incentives may increase employment of people with criminal records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1