What determines transfer of carbon from plants to mycorrhizal fungi?

IF 9.4 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/nph.20145
Rebecca A Bunn, Ana Corrêa, Jaya Joshi, Christina Kaiser, Ylva Lekberg, Cindy E Prescott, Anna Sala, Justine Karst
{"title":"What determines transfer of carbon from plants to mycorrhizal fungi?","authors":"Rebecca A Bunn, Ana Corrêa, Jaya Joshi, Christina Kaiser, Ylva Lekberg, Cindy E Prescott, Anna Sala, Justine Karst","doi":"10.1111/nph.20145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biological Market Models are common evolutionary frameworks to understand the maintenance of mutualism in mycorrhizas. 'Surplus C' hypotheses provide an alternative framework where stoichiometry and source-sink dynamics govern mycorrhizal function. A critical difference between these frameworks is whether carbon transfer from plants is regulated by nutrient transfer from fungi or through source-sink dynamics. In this review, we: provide a historical perspective; summarize studies that asked whether plants transfer more carbon to fungi that transfer more nutrients; conduct a meta-analysis to assess whether mycorrhizal plant growth suppressions are related to carbon transfer; and review literature on cellular mechanisms for carbon transfer. In sum, current knowledge does not indicate that carbon transfer from plants is directly regulated by nutrient delivery from fungi. Further, mycorrhizal plant growth responses were linked to nutrient uptake rather than carbon transfer. These findings are more consistent with 'Surplus C' hypotheses than Biological Market Models. However, we also identify research gaps, and future research may uncover a mechanism directly linking carbon and nutrient transfer. Until then, we urge caution when applying economic terminology to describe mycorrhizas. We present a synthesis of ideas, consider knowledge gaps, and suggest experiments to advance the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological Market Models are common evolutionary frameworks to understand the maintenance of mutualism in mycorrhizas. 'Surplus C' hypotheses provide an alternative framework where stoichiometry and source-sink dynamics govern mycorrhizal function. A critical difference between these frameworks is whether carbon transfer from plants is regulated by nutrient transfer from fungi or through source-sink dynamics. In this review, we: provide a historical perspective; summarize studies that asked whether plants transfer more carbon to fungi that transfer more nutrients; conduct a meta-analysis to assess whether mycorrhizal plant growth suppressions are related to carbon transfer; and review literature on cellular mechanisms for carbon transfer. In sum, current knowledge does not indicate that carbon transfer from plants is directly regulated by nutrient delivery from fungi. Further, mycorrhizal plant growth responses were linked to nutrient uptake rather than carbon transfer. These findings are more consistent with 'Surplus C' hypotheses than Biological Market Models. However, we also identify research gaps, and future research may uncover a mechanism directly linking carbon and nutrient transfer. Until then, we urge caution when applying economic terminology to describe mycorrhizas. We present a synthesis of ideas, consider knowledge gaps, and suggest experiments to advance the field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么决定了植物向菌根真菌的碳转移?
生物市场模型是理解菌根维持互生关系的常见进化框架。过剩碳 "假说提供了另一种框架,在这种框架中,化学计量和源-汇动力学控制着菌根的功能。这些框架之间的关键区别在于,植物的碳转移是受真菌的养分转移调节,还是受源汇动态调节。在这篇综述中,我们将:提供一个历史视角;总结关于植物是否将更多的碳转移给转移更多养分的真菌的研究;进行荟萃分析以评估菌根植物生长抑制是否与碳转移有关;以及回顾关于碳转移的细胞机制的文献。总之,目前的知识并不表明植物的碳转移直接受真菌养分输送的调节。此外,菌根植物的生长反应与养分吸收而非碳转移有关。这些发现更符合 "剩余碳 "假说,而不是生物市场模型。不过,我们也发现了一些研究空白,未来的研究可能会发现碳和养分转移直接相关的机制。在此之前,我们敦促在使用经济术语描述菌根时要谨慎。我们综述了各种观点,考虑了知识差距,并提出了推进该领域研究的实验建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.
期刊最新文献
The chemical language of plant-microbe-microbe associations: an introduction to a Virtual Issue. GLR-dependent calcium and electrical signals are not coupled to systemic, oxylipin-based wound-induced gene expression in Marchantia polymorpha. Evolution of glucuronoxylan side chain variability in vascular plants and the compensatory adaptations of cell wall-degrading hydrolases. Tip of the iceberg? Three novel TOPLESS-interacting effectors of the gall-inducing fungus Ustilago maydis. Hung out to dry: diminished flowers offer less to pollinators and us.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1