Enhanced Differentiation of Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis Types Using Semi-Quantitative 99mTc-MIBI Uptake Analysis: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Medical Science Monitor Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.12659/MSM.945444
Leo Fischer, Neva Girotto, Maja Ilić Tomaš, Martina Mavrinac, Andrica Lekić, Dragana Antončić, Tatjana Bogović Crnčić
{"title":"Enhanced Differentiation of Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis Types Using Semi-Quantitative 99mTc-MIBI Uptake Analysis: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Leo Fischer, Neva Girotto, Maja Ilić Tomaš, Martina Mavrinac, Andrica Lekić, Dragana Antončić, Tatjana Bogović Crnčić","doi":"10.12659/MSM.945444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Technetium (99mTc)-labelled Methoxy-2-Isobutylisonitrile (MIBI) is a diagnostic lipophilic cationic radiotracer used to evaluate the cardiac, breast, thyroid, and parathyroid pathology. This study aimed to evaluate the role of MIBI combined with Tc-99m pertechnetate thyroid scintigraphy, thyroid ultrasonography, and measurement of thyrotropin, thyroid hormones, and autoantibodies to subtype amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) and the contribution of semi-quantitative analysis of MIBI uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study included 36 patients with AIT who underwent thyrotropin, thyroid hormone, and autoantibody analysis using chemiluminescent method, ultrasonography, pertechnetate, and MIBI thyroid scintigraphy with semi-quantitative uptake, including calculation of the target-to-background ratio (TBR) with 2 different background regions. The MIBI washout rate (WR) was analyzed in all groups. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, correlations, and the receiver operating characteristic curve - area under the curve (ROC-AUC). The results were compared with the control group. RESULTS Based on visual and semi-quantitative analyses, patients were successfully categorized into AIT groups (AIT-1, AIT-2 and AIT-3) but the latter method enabled better differentiation of MIBI uptake between all groups. Additionally, ROC-AUC analysis determined cutoff values which enabled discerning between AIT-1 and AIT-2 groups, and AIT-1 and AIT-3 groups. WR showed no significant difference between all AIT groups and controls (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Visual MIBI analysis enabled differentiation between AIT-1 and 2 groups, but the method was substantially improved with semi-quantitative analysis, especially in defining AIT-3 group. However, multicenter collaboration with larger studies is needed to standardize the method and obtain more accurate and consistent results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e945444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Technetium (99mTc)-labelled Methoxy-2-Isobutylisonitrile (MIBI) is a diagnostic lipophilic cationic radiotracer used to evaluate the cardiac, breast, thyroid, and parathyroid pathology. This study aimed to evaluate the role of MIBI combined with Tc-99m pertechnetate thyroid scintigraphy, thyroid ultrasonography, and measurement of thyrotropin, thyroid hormones, and autoantibodies to subtype amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) and the contribution of semi-quantitative analysis of MIBI uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study included 36 patients with AIT who underwent thyrotropin, thyroid hormone, and autoantibody analysis using chemiluminescent method, ultrasonography, pertechnetate, and MIBI thyroid scintigraphy with semi-quantitative uptake, including calculation of the target-to-background ratio (TBR) with 2 different background regions. The MIBI washout rate (WR) was analyzed in all groups. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, correlations, and the receiver operating characteristic curve - area under the curve (ROC-AUC). The results were compared with the control group. RESULTS Based on visual and semi-quantitative analyses, patients were successfully categorized into AIT groups (AIT-1, AIT-2 and AIT-3) but the latter method enabled better differentiation of MIBI uptake between all groups. Additionally, ROC-AUC analysis determined cutoff values which enabled discerning between AIT-1 and AIT-2 groups, and AIT-1 and AIT-3 groups. WR showed no significant difference between all AIT groups and controls (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Visual MIBI analysis enabled differentiation between AIT-1 and 2 groups, but the method was substantially improved with semi-quantitative analysis, especially in defining AIT-3 group. However, multicenter collaboration with larger studies is needed to standardize the method and obtain more accurate and consistent results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用半定量 99mTc-MIBI 摄取分析加强胺碘酮诱发的甲亢类型的鉴别:一项试点研究。
背景锝(99mTc)标记的甲氧基-2-异丁基异腈(MIBI)是一种诊断性亲油阳离子放射性示踪剂,用于评估心脏、乳腺、甲状腺和甲状旁腺病变。本研究旨在评估 MIBI 与 Tc-99m 过硫酸盐甲状腺闪烁照相术、甲状腺超声波造影术、促甲状腺激素、甲状腺激素和自身抗体测定相结合在亚型胺碘酮诱发甲状腺毒症(AIT)中的作用,以及 MIBI 摄取半定量分析的贡献。材料与方法 该横断面研究纳入了36例AIT患者,他们接受了促甲状腺激素、甲状腺激素和自身抗体分析,分析方法包括化学发光法、超声波检查、过硫酸盐检查和MIBI甲状腺闪烁扫描半定量摄取,包括计算2个不同背景区域的靶-背景比(TBR)。对所有组的 MIBI 冲洗率(WR)进行了分析。统计分析采用描述性统计、相关性和接收者操作特征曲线--曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)。结果与对照组进行了比较。结果 根据视觉和半定量分析,成功地将患者分为 AIT 组(AIT-1、AIT-2 和 AIT-3),但后者能更好地区分所有组间的 MIBI 摄取。此外,ROC-AUC 分析还确定了能够区分 AIT-1 组和 AIT-2 组以及 AIT-1 组和 AIT-3 组的临界值。WR 显示所有 AIT 组与对照组之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 可视化 MIBI 分析可区分 AIT-1 组和 AIT-2 组,但半定量分析可大大改进该方法,尤其是在定义 AIT-3 组方面。然而,要使该方法标准化并获得更准确、更一致的结果,还需要与更多的大型研究进行多中心合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
期刊最新文献
Non-Surgical Management of Frozen Shoulder Using Manipulation Under Local Anesthesia: A Retrospective Study. Machine Learning Analysis of Retrospective Data From 503 Hospitalized Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes to Identify Factors Associated With Cognitive Impairment. Baseline Tumor Biology Predicts Survival After Recurrence in Gastric Cancer: Impact of LVI, PNI, and HER2 Status. Eutopic Endometrium Immune Changes Involved in Development and Progression of Endometriosis: A Review. Arthroscopic Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Preliminary Study of the Triple FengChao Button Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1