Belief that Progress has Been Made in Curing Cancer Varies by Perception of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Education, Frequency of Social Media Use, and Healthcare System Trust: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Control Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10732748241289259
Jim P Stimpson, Sungchul Park, Aditi Srivastava, Miguel Ángel Cano
{"title":"Belief that Progress has Been Made in Curing Cancer Varies by Perception of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Education, Frequency of Social Media Use, and Healthcare System Trust: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jim P Stimpson, Sungchul Park, Aditi Srivastava, Miguel Ángel Cano","doi":"10.1177/10732748241289259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the relationship between perceptions of health mis/disinformation on social media and belief that progress has been made in curing cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional, retrospective data collected from 4246 adult social media users in the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6). The outcome variable was the belief in whether progress has been made in curing cancer. The primary predictor variable was the perception of health mis/disinformation on social media, categorized as 'Substantial' and '< Substantial'. We also examined whether the relationship varied by health care system trust, frequency of social media use, and education. The analysis controlled for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perception of substantial social media health mis- and disinformation was associated with a lower likelihood of believing progress has been made in curing cancer (odds ratios = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.94). Persons who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation and had low trust in the health care system were less likely to believe progress has been made in curing cancer: 36% (95% CI: 28-45%). Persons who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation and used social media less than daily were less likely to believe progress has been made in curing cancer: 44% (95% CI: 36-52%). Persons without a college degree who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation were less likely to agree that progress has been made in curing cancer: 44% (95% CI: 39-50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to misinformation on social media may be associated with negative attitudes about advances in curing cancer, particularly among social media users with low trust in the health care system trust, less frequent social media users, or those without a college degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241289259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the relationship between perceptions of health mis/disinformation on social media and belief that progress has been made in curing cancer.

Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional, retrospective data collected from 4246 adult social media users in the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6). The outcome variable was the belief in whether progress has been made in curing cancer. The primary predictor variable was the perception of health mis/disinformation on social media, categorized as 'Substantial' and '< Substantial'. We also examined whether the relationship varied by health care system trust, frequency of social media use, and education. The analysis controlled for demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related factors.

Results: Perception of substantial social media health mis- and disinformation was associated with a lower likelihood of believing progress has been made in curing cancer (odds ratios = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.59-0.94). Persons who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation and had low trust in the health care system were less likely to believe progress has been made in curing cancer: 36% (95% CI: 28-45%). Persons who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation and used social media less than daily were less likely to believe progress has been made in curing cancer: 44% (95% CI: 36-52%). Persons without a college degree who perceived substantial social media health mis-and disinformation were less likely to agree that progress has been made in curing cancer: 44% (95% CI: 39-50%).

Conclusion: Exposure to misinformation on social media may be associated with negative attitudes about advances in curing cancer, particularly among social media users with low trust in the health care system trust, less frequent social media users, or those without a college degree.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对治愈癌症已取得进展的信念因对社交媒体健康误导和虚假信息的看法、教育程度、社交媒体使用频率以及对医疗保健系统的信任度而异:一项横断面研究。
研究目的本研究探讨了人们对社交媒体上健康误导/信息的看法与认为在治愈癌症方面已取得进展之间的关系:我们分析了在 2022 年全国健康信息趋势调查(HINTS 6)中收集的 4246 名成年社交媒体用户的横断面回顾性数据。结果变量是对治愈癌症是否取得进展的看法。主要预测变量是对社交媒体上健康误导/信息的看法,分为 "实质性 "和"<实质性 "两种。我们还研究了这一关系是否因医疗保健系统信任度、社交媒体使用频率和教育程度而异。分析控制了人口、社会经济和健康相关因素:结果:认为社交媒体上存在大量健康误导和虚假信息的人认为在治疗癌症方面已取得进展的可能性较低(几率比 = 0.74,95% CI = 0.59-0.94)。认为社交媒体上存在大量健康误导和虚假信息且对医疗保健系统信任度较低的人更不可能相信在治愈癌症方面取得了进展:36%(95% 置信区间:28-45%)。认为社交媒体上存在大量健康误导和虚假信息且社交媒体使用少于每天一次的人,不太可能相信在治愈癌症方面取得了进展:44%(95% CI:36-52%)。没有大学学历、认为社交媒体上存在大量健康误导和虚假信息的人不太可能同意在治愈癌症方面取得了进展:44% (95% CI: 39-50%):结论:社交媒体上的错误信息可能与人们对癌症治疗进展的消极态度有关,尤其是对医疗保健系统信任度较低的社交媒体用户、社交媒体使用频率较低的用户或没有大学学历的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Observational Study of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer and Colorectal Cancer From a Single Center in the Recent 5 years Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN) Letter to the Editor: How We Treat Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Uptake of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination and Associated Factors Among Female Students Attending Secondary Schools in South West Shoa, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2022 Raltitrexed Chemotherapy Regimen Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1