Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1177/10732748251413334
Darren R Brenner, Xuanhao Feng, Courtney Maxwell, John M Hutchinson, Chantelle Carbonell, Reynaldo Nambayan, Linda Rabeneck, Jill Tinmouth, Nauzer Forbes, Steven J Heitman, Khara M Sauro, Colleen Cuthbert, Dylan E O'Sullivan, Robert J Hilsden
IntroductionTherapeutic intervention with chemopreventive agents (CPA) represents a promising avenue for cancer prevention; however, additional data on patient adherence are needed. We developed the Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention Acceleration Platform (CRC-CHAMP) and examined the feasibility of real-world CPA intervention in persons with an increased risk for CRC. Herein, we describe the recruitment, uptake, and adherence within this pilot study.MethodsFor this single-arm prospective pilot study (NCT05402124), we recruited individuals from the Forzani and MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre (CCSC) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Eligible individuals were between the ages of 50-59 and had a history of high-risk adenomatous polyps diagnosed at the CCSC in the preceding 12 months. After consenting, each participant was provided open-label acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at 81 mg every day for 90 days. Participants were contacted by telephone every 30 days to collect current adherence (primary outcome) and occurrence of any adverse events (secondary outcome).ResultsThroughout recruitment, 823 potential participants were identified, with 69 (53.1%) being eligible and 67 (51.5%) finally enrolling in the study. The median age of the participants was 56 yr. At the follow-ups, 60 participants (89.6%) were adherent at 30 days, 54 participants (80.6%) were adherent at 60 days, and 55 (82.1%) participants were adherent at 90 days. A total of 9 (13.4%) participants experienced minor adverse events likely unrelated to the ASA.ConclusionParticipants recruited to this pilot study had a high level of adherence throughout the 90-day period with minimal side effects. Challenges to recruitment included low response rate by mail and a high number of those contacted already taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This study suggests that individuals post-polypectomy of large polyp may be interested in CRC chemoprevention. Additionally, this study provides a framework for future evaluation of additional therapeutic interventions.
{"title":"The Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention Acceleration and Improvement Platform (CRC-CHAMP) - Cohort Description.","authors":"Darren R Brenner, Xuanhao Feng, Courtney Maxwell, John M Hutchinson, Chantelle Carbonell, Reynaldo Nambayan, Linda Rabeneck, Jill Tinmouth, Nauzer Forbes, Steven J Heitman, Khara M Sauro, Colleen Cuthbert, Dylan E O'Sullivan, Robert J Hilsden","doi":"10.1177/10732748251413334","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251413334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTherapeutic intervention with chemopreventive agents (CPA) represents a promising avenue for cancer prevention; however, additional data on patient adherence are needed. We developed the Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention Acceleration Platform (CRC-CHAMP) and examined the feasibility of real-world CPA intervention in persons with an increased risk for CRC. Herein, we describe the recruitment, uptake, and adherence within this pilot study.MethodsFor this single-arm prospective pilot study (NCT05402124), we recruited individuals from the Forzani and MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre (CCSC) in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Eligible individuals were between the ages of 50-59 and had a history of high-risk adenomatous polyps diagnosed at the CCSC in the preceding 12 months. After consenting, each participant was provided open-label acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at 81 mg every day for 90 days. Participants were contacted by telephone every 30 days to collect current adherence (primary outcome) and occurrence of any adverse events (secondary outcome).ResultsThroughout recruitment, 823 potential participants were identified, with 69 (53.1%) being eligible and 67 (51.5%) finally enrolling in the study. The median age of the participants was 56 yr. At the follow-ups, 60 participants (89.6%) were adherent at 30 days, 54 participants (80.6%) were adherent at 60 days, and 55 (82.1%) participants were adherent at 90 days. A total of 9 (13.4%) participants experienced minor adverse events likely unrelated to the ASA.ConclusionParticipants recruited to this pilot study had a high level of adherence throughout the 90-day period with minimal side effects. Challenges to recruitment included low response rate by mail and a high number of those contacted already taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This study suggests that individuals post-polypectomy of large polyp may be interested in CRC chemoprevention. Additionally, this study provides a framework for future evaluation of additional therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748251413334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789377/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1177/10732748261420506
Yvonne L Eaglehouse, Christian Dide-Agossou, Sarah Darmon, Sean Q Kern, Molly R Oroho, Andrea A Almeida, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu
IntroductionProstate cancer is frequently diagnosed at ages when men may also have comorbidity. Access to care may influence both comorbidity management and cancer treatment and recovery. We examined the association between comorbidity and postoperative outcomes among men with prostate cancer in the universal access Military Health System (MHS).MethodsWe identified a cohort of men diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma from 2001-2014 who received radical prostatectomy (RP) within 1 year of diagnosis in the MilCanEpi database, which links the Department of War Cancer Registry and MHS Data Repository. We used ICD-9 diagnosis codes to capture 90-day postoperative general and genitourinary (GU) complications and hospital readmissions; and 18-month postoperative GU complications. Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes associated with comorbidity (0, 1-2, or ≥3) measured using the Elixhauser Index.ResultsThe study included 5645 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer (mean age 57.9 ± 7.7 years) who received RP; 39.9% of patients had no comorbidity, 43.9% had 1-2 conditions, and 16.2% had ≥3 conditions. Patients with ≥3 comorbidities had statistically significant higher risks of 90-day general (ARR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.34, 2.64) and GU (ARR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.36) complications and hospital readmission (ARR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.26) relative to men with no comorbidity. At 18-month post-RP, men with 1-2 comorbidities (ARR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.35) and ≥3 comorbidities (ARR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.55) had statistically significant higher risk of measured GU complications relative to men with no comorbidity.ConclusionsIn the MHS, higher comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day and 18-month complications and 90-day readmissions following RP for prostate cancer. This study identifies a need for risk management strategies to reduce complication rates among men with higher comorbidity levels diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated by RP.
前列腺癌通常在男性也可能有合并症的年龄被诊断出来。获得护理可能会影响合并症的管理和癌症的治疗和康复。我们研究了普适军事卫生系统(MHS)中男性前列腺癌患者的合并症与术后结局之间的关系。方法:研究人员在MilCanEpi数据库中确定了一组2001-2014年诊断为非转移性前列腺癌的男性,这些男性在诊断后1年内接受了根治性前列腺切除术(RP),该数据库连接了美国战争癌症登记处和MHS数据库。我们使用ICD-9诊断代码来记录术后90天的全身和泌尿生殖系统(GU)并发症和再入院情况;术后18个月的GU并发症。泊松回归估计校正风险比(ARRs)和95%置信区间(ci),与共病相关的结果(0、1-2或≥3)使用Elixhauser指数测量。结果本研究纳入5645例接受RP治疗的非转移性前列腺癌患者(平均年龄57.9±7.7岁);39.9%的患者无合并症,43.9%的患者有1-2种情况,16.2%的患者有≥3种情况。有≥3种合并症的患者发生90天一般(ARR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.34, 2.64)和GU (ARR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.36)并发症和再入院(ARR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.26)的风险均高于无合并症的男性,具有统计学意义。在rp后18个月,有1-2个合并症(ARR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.35)和≥3个合并症(ARR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.55)的男性患GU并发症的风险比无合并症的男性高。结论在MHS中,较高的合并症与前列腺癌RP术后30天和18个月并发症以及90天再入院的风险增加有关。本研究确定了风险管理策略的必要性,以降低诊断为前列腺癌并接受RP治疗的高合并症男性的并发症发生率。
{"title":"Comorbidity Level and Risk of 90-day and 18-month Complications Among Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in the Military Health System.","authors":"Yvonne L Eaglehouse, Christian Dide-Agossou, Sarah Darmon, Sean Q Kern, Molly R Oroho, Andrea A Almeida, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu","doi":"10.1177/10732748261420506","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261420506","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionProstate cancer is frequently diagnosed at ages when men may also have comorbidity. Access to care may influence both comorbidity management and cancer treatment and recovery. We examined the association between comorbidity and postoperative outcomes among men with prostate cancer in the universal access Military Health System (MHS).MethodsWe identified a cohort of men diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma from 2001-2014 who received radical prostatectomy (RP) within 1 year of diagnosis in the MilCanEpi database, which links the Department of War Cancer Registry and MHS Data Repository. We used ICD-9 diagnosis codes to capture 90-day postoperative general and genitourinary (GU) complications and hospital readmissions; and 18-month postoperative GU complications. Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes associated with comorbidity (0, 1-2, or ≥3) measured using the Elixhauser Index.ResultsThe study included 5645 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer (mean age 57.9 ± 7.7 years) who received RP; 39.9% of patients had no comorbidity, 43.9% had 1-2 conditions, and 16.2% had ≥3 conditions. Patients with ≥3 comorbidities had statistically significant higher risks of 90-day general (ARR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.34, 2.64) and GU (ARR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.36) complications and hospital readmission (ARR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.12, 2.26) relative to men with no comorbidity. At 18-month post-RP, men with 1-2 comorbidities (ARR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.35) and ≥3 comorbidities (ARR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.55) had statistically significant higher risk of measured GU complications relative to men with no comorbidity.ConclusionsIn the MHS, higher comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day and 18-month complications and 90-day readmissions following RP for prostate cancer. This study identifies a need for risk management strategies to reduce complication rates among men with higher comorbidity levels diagnosed with prostate cancer and treated by RP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261420506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12833137/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1177/10732748251413808
Rosj Gallicchio, Mariarita Milella, Alessia Giordano, Mauro Cives, Rebecca Storto, Anna Nardelli, Giovanni Calice, Matteo Landriscina, Giovanni Storto
IntroductionThe somatostatin receptor (SSTR) standardized uptake value (SUVmaxsstr) obtained by [68Ga]Ga-edotreotide positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([68Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT) helps recognize patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) who are at a high risk for adverse outcomes. This observational cohort study was conducted to verify whether the SSTR representative tumor volume (RTVsstr) can provide incremental prognostic information over conventional PET/CT parameters in patients with metastatic disease.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients (48% female) with metastatic GEP-NETs who underwent [68Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT between January 2022 and November 2023. The mean SUVmaxsstr, mean RTVsstr (cm3; 42% threshold), and total RTVsstr were recorded. Thereafter, patients were followed up for 22.9 (range: 8-42) months. The PET/CT results were compared to the progression free survival (PFS).ResultsSixty patients (59 ± 5 years) were enrolled. Only the mean and total RTVsstr values were predictive in the multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for both the mean and total RTVsstr demonstrated a significantly better PFS in patients presenting with lower than greater values (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively; log-rank test). SUVmaxsstr was not appropriate for predicting PFS.ConclusionThe mean or total RTVsstr represents a valuable volumetric parameter able to predict outcomes in patients with GEP-NETs that are metastatic at onset. The degree of the SSTR representative tumor burden, rather than the maximal SSTR representation at single voxel, has a predominant value for influencing the response to therapy in this cohort.
{"title":"Ga-68-Edotreotide PET/CT SSTR Total Tumor Volume as a Predictor of Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.","authors":"Rosj Gallicchio, Mariarita Milella, Alessia Giordano, Mauro Cives, Rebecca Storto, Anna Nardelli, Giovanni Calice, Matteo Landriscina, Giovanni Storto","doi":"10.1177/10732748251413808","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251413808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe somatostatin receptor (SSTR) standardized uptake value (SUVmax<sub>sstr</sub>) obtained by [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-edotreotide positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT) helps recognize patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) who are at a high risk for adverse outcomes. This observational cohort study was conducted to verify whether the SSTR representative tumor volume (RTV<sub>sstr</sub>) can provide incremental prognostic information over conventional PET/CT parameters in patients with metastatic disease.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients (48% female) with metastatic GEP-NETs who underwent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-SSTR PET/CT between January 2022 and November 2023. The mean SUVmax<sub>sstr</sub>, mean RTV<sub>sstr</sub> (cm<sup>3</sup>; 42% threshold), and total RTV<sub>sstr</sub> were recorded. Thereafter, patients were followed up for 22.9 (range: 8-42) months. The PET/CT results were compared to the progression free survival (PFS).ResultsSixty patients (59 ± 5 years) were enrolled. Only the mean and total RTV<sub>sstr</sub> values were predictive in the multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for both the mean and total RTV<sub>sstr</sub> demonstrated a significantly better PFS in patients presenting with lower than greater values (<i>P</i> = 0.001 and <i>P</i> = 0.007, respectively; log-rank test). SUVmax<sub>sstr</sub> was not appropriate for predicting PFS.ConclusionThe mean or total RTV<sub>sstr</sub> represents a valuable volumetric parameter able to predict outcomes in patients with GEP-NETs that are metastatic at onset. The degree of the SSTR representative tumor burden, rather than the maximal SSTR representation at single voxel, has a predominant value for influencing the response to therapy in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748251413808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12833188/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1177/10732748261423266
Gabrielle Falco, Sarah Darmon, Matthew Nealeigh, Robert W Krell, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu, Yvonne L Eaglehouse
IntroductionSurgery is an essential component of breast cancer treatment. Surgical complications may impact receipt of adjuvant therapy and long-term outcomes. Differences in insurance coverage and access to care by patient age in the general U.S. population may affect breast cancer diagnosis and surgery and thus age comparisons in research. We compared postoperative outcomes following breast cancer surgery between age groups in the U.S. Military Health System, which provides beneficiaries access to comprehensive care across the lifespan.MethodsWe identified women aged ≥18 years with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2001 to 2014 undergoing surgery without reconstruction in the MilCanEpi database. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in association with age at diagnosis (18-39, 40-49, 50-64, and ≥65) for 30-day general and breast complications (surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, or lymphedema), reoperation, and hospital readmission while controlling for potential confounders.ResultsThe study included 7835 women who were 18-39 (9.2%), 40-49 (23.6%), 50-64 (42.7%), and ≥65 (24.5%). The overall risk of general or breast complications did not differ significantly by age when controlled for demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. However, women aged 40-49 had a statistically increased adjusted risk of seroma (ARR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.03-2.18) compared to women aged 50-64. No significant age-related differences were observed for reoperation or hospital readmission after adjustment.ConclusionIn the Military Health System, the overall risk of 30-day postoperative complications and hospital readmissions were not statistically different by age after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors. The findings support that surgical decision-making continue to prioritize tumor characteristics, comorbidity burden, and other clinical factors rather than age alone when assessing perioperative risk.
手术是乳腺癌治疗的重要组成部分。手术并发症可能影响辅助治疗的接受和长期预后。在美国普通人群中,保险覆盖范围和患者年龄的差异可能会影响乳腺癌的诊断和手术,从而影响研究中的年龄比较。我们比较了美国军事卫生系统中不同年龄组乳腺癌手术后的术后结果,该系统为受益者提供了终身全面护理的机会。方法:我们在MilCanEpi数据库中选取2001年至2014年诊断的年龄≥18岁的I-III期乳腺癌患者,并进行了无重建手术。在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下,多变量泊松回归估计了30天一般并发症和乳房并发症(手术部位感染、血肿、血肿或淋巴水肿)、再手术和再入院的校正风险比(ARRs),其95%置信区间(CIs)与诊断年龄(18-39岁、40-49岁、50-64岁和≥65岁)相关。结果共纳入7835名女性,年龄分别为18-39岁(9.2%)、40-49岁(23.6%)、50-64岁(42.7%)和≥65岁(24.5%)。当控制人口统计学、肿瘤和治疗变量时,一般或乳房并发症的总体风险在年龄上没有显著差异。然而,与50-64岁的女性相比,40-49岁的女性血清肿的调整风险在统计学上增加(ARR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.03-2.18)。调整后的再手术或再入院没有明显的年龄相关差异。结论在军队卫生系统中,经临床和人口统计学因素调整后,不同年龄患者术后30天并发症和再入院的总体风险无统计学差异。研究结果支持,在评估围手术期风险时,手术决策继续优先考虑肿瘤特征、合并症负担和其他临床因素,而不是单独考虑年龄。
{"title":"Age at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes for Women Treated in a Universal Health System.","authors":"Gabrielle Falco, Sarah Darmon, Matthew Nealeigh, Robert W Krell, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu, Yvonne L Eaglehouse","doi":"10.1177/10732748261423266","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261423266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionSurgery is an essential component of breast cancer treatment. Surgical complications may impact receipt of adjuvant therapy and long-term outcomes. Differences in insurance coverage and access to care by patient age in the general U.S. population may affect breast cancer diagnosis and surgery and thus age comparisons in research. We compared postoperative outcomes following breast cancer surgery between age groups in the U.S. Military Health System, which provides beneficiaries access to comprehensive care across the lifespan.MethodsWe identified women aged ≥18 years with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2001 to 2014 undergoing surgery without reconstruction in the MilCanEpi database. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated the adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in association with age at diagnosis (18-39, 40-49, 50-64, and ≥65) for 30-day general and breast complications (surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, or lymphedema), reoperation, and hospital readmission while controlling for potential confounders.ResultsThe study included 7835 women who were 18-39 (9.2%), 40-49 (23.6%), 50-64 (42.7%), and ≥65 (24.5%). The overall risk of general or breast complications did not differ significantly by age when controlled for demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. However, women aged 40-49 had a statistically increased adjusted risk of seroma (ARR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.03-2.18) compared to women aged 50-64. No significant age-related differences were observed for reoperation or hospital readmission after adjustment.ConclusionIn the Military Health System, the overall risk of 30-day postoperative complications and hospital readmissions were not statistically different by age after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors. The findings support that surgical decision-making continue to prioritize tumor characteristics, comorbidity burden, and other clinical factors rather than age alone when assessing perioperative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261423266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12881331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1177/10732748251414201
Folakemi T Odedina, Hayley Thompson, Kimlin Tam Ashing
Background: While much of cancer research has historically centered on innovations within clinical or laboratory settings, most of the factors shaping equity in cancer outcomes reside outside hospital walls-in neighborhoods, workplaces, and community networks. This reality underscores the need for community-involved and community-living interventions: programs co-designed and delivered within communities to meet people where they live, work, and socialize. Such interventions hold the greatest promise for sustainability because they are embedded in the daily lives, cultures, and resources of the populations they serve. Methods: This special collection brings together research that illuminates the power of community-centered and community co-led strategies for prevention, early detection, treatment, and survivorship across diverse settings. Results: The articles in this series illustrate how innovation, cultural humility, and local engagement can bridge persistent gaps in cancer care. Conclusion: Together, they highlight how communities themselves are essential partners in dismantling disparities and achieving lasting cancer control.
{"title":"Editorial: Co-Creating Community-Living Interventions for Sustainable Cancer Control Programs: Meeting the Community Where They Are to Address Cancer Burden.","authors":"Folakemi T Odedina, Hayley Thompson, Kimlin Tam Ashing","doi":"10.1177/10732748251414201","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251414201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While much of cancer research has historically centered on innovations within clinical or laboratory settings, most of the factors shaping equity in cancer outcomes reside outside hospital walls-in neighborhoods, workplaces, and community networks. This reality underscores the need for community-involved and community-living interventions: <i>programs co-designed and delivered within communities to meet people where they live, work, and socialize</i>. Such interventions hold the greatest promise for sustainability because they are embedded in the daily lives, cultures, and resources of the populations they serve. <b>Methods:</b> This special collection brings together research that illuminates the power of community-centered and community co-led strategies for prevention, early detection, treatment, and survivorship across diverse settings. <b>Results:</b> The articles in this series illustrate how innovation, cultural humility, and local engagement can bridge persistent gaps in cancer care. <b>Conclusion:</b> Together, they highlight how communities themselves are essential partners in dismantling disparities and achieving lasting cancer control.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748251414201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12789379/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1177/10732748251414202
Heléne Dahlqvist, Ann Ekdahl, Emma Wiklund, Mats Jong, Sveinung Berntsen, Carina Ribe Fernee, Miek C Jong
IntroductionAdolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) affected by cancer are at risk of experiencing late and long-term effects following cancer diagnosis and treatment. While structured interventions have demonstrated potential benefits for well-being during the intervention itself, little is known about how AYAs affected by cancer engage with and experience nature in their everyday lives beyond the formal program context. The aim of this study was to explore how a selected group of AYAs affected by cancer-who had participated in a nature-based intervention (the WAYA program)-experience nature and its role in supporting and managing late and long-term effects of cancer and its treatment, beyond the context of the program itself.MethodThis qualitative study explored the experiences of nature following the WAYA intervention among AYAs affected by cancer. Data were collected by focus group interviews at a three-month follow-up, using participant-selected photographs as visual prompts to elicit reflection on how nature supports management of late and long-term effects of cancer. A photovoice-inspired approach guided discussion questions and facilitated individual and collective meaning-making. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of this study showed one theme: Reconnecting with self and meaning through nature's unconditional presence-beyond human connection. The theme comprises the two categories Nature as a resource for inner balance and Nature as a meaningful companion, and five sub-categories: Managing by being mindful, Managing by experiencing rest and being calm, Experiencing metaphoric recognition, Sparking comfort, hope and positive emotions, and Nature as a space without obligations.ConclusionThis study explored how AYAs affected by cancer engage with nature beyond formal programs, revealing its potential in better management of late and long-term effects. These findings can inform low-threshold, personal meaningful, and sustainable approaches to clinical practice, well-being, and rehabilitation for this vulnerable group.
{"title":"Managing Late and Long-Term Effects Among Swedish Adolescents and Young Adults Affected by Cancer Following a Wilderness Intervention: Reconnecting with Self and Meaning Through Nature's Unconditional Presence - A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Heléne Dahlqvist, Ann Ekdahl, Emma Wiklund, Mats Jong, Sveinung Berntsen, Carina Ribe Fernee, Miek C Jong","doi":"10.1177/10732748251414202","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748251414202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAdolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) affected by cancer are at risk of experiencing late and long-term effects following cancer diagnosis and treatment. While structured interventions have demonstrated potential benefits for well-being during the intervention itself, little is known about how AYAs affected by cancer engage with and experience nature in their everyday lives beyond the formal program context. The aim of this study was to explore how a selected group of AYAs affected by cancer-who had participated in a nature-based intervention (the WAYA program)-experience nature and its role in supporting and managing late and long-term effects of cancer and its treatment, beyond the context of the program itself.MethodThis qualitative study explored the experiences of nature following the WAYA intervention among AYAs affected by cancer. Data were collected by focus group interviews at a three-month follow-up, using participant-selected photographs as visual prompts to elicit reflection on how nature supports management of late and long-term effects of cancer. A photovoice-inspired approach guided discussion questions and facilitated individual and collective meaning-making. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis of this study showed one theme: Reconnecting with self and meaning through nature's unconditional presence-beyond human connection. The theme comprises the two categories <i>Nature as a resource for inner balance</i> and <i>Nature as a meaningful companion</i>, and five sub-categories<i>: Managing by being mindful, Managing by experiencing rest and being calm, Experiencing metaphoric recognition, Sparking comfort, hope and positive emotions,</i> and <i>Nature as a space without obligations.</i>ConclusionThis study explored how AYAs affected by cancer engage with nature beyond formal programs, revealing its potential in better management of late and long-term effects. These findings can inform low-threshold, personal meaningful, and sustainable approaches to clinical practice, well-being, and rehabilitation for this vulnerable group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748251414202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12827910/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1177/10732748261419591
Juliana Namutundu, Edith Nakku-Joloba, Juliet Kiguli, Fredrick Makumbi, Fred C Semitala, Rhoda K Wanyenze, Miriam Laker-Oketta, Damalie Nakanjako, Miriam Nakalembe
IntroductionCervical cancer screening literacy among rural women living with HIV (WLHIV), the ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply cervical cancer screening information to use cervical cancer screening services, is affected by individual factors including low educational attainment, low socioeconomic status, poor cervical cancer risk perception, fear, misconceptions, and beliefs, as well as interpersonal, community, and health facility barriers. However, rural public health facilities have limited resources that limit their ability mitigate these challenges. This research identified barriers and facilitators of healthcare providers' responsiveness to cervical cancer screening literacy needs of rural WLHIV in Eastern Uganda.MethodsThis was a descriptive qualitative study that involved conducting 15 Key Informant Interviews with all individuals involved in planning, communicating, and providing cervical cancer screening services at 4 purposively selected rural public health facilities in Eastern Uganda. Data were collected using a guide developed based on the organizational Health Literacy responsiveness framework. This framework was used to derive deductive categories (domains and sub-domains) during thematic analysis, and barriers and facilitators were inductively identified from the interviews.ResultsBarriers included non-involvement of health workers and affected women in planning, limited funding, few trained health workers, long waiting times, limited space, limited communication modalities, inadequate Information Education and Communication (IEC) materials, IEC materials not translated to the local language, challenges with addressing misconceptions, and language barriers. Facilitators included support from implementing partners, free cervical cancer screening services, integration of cervical cancer screening into HIV care, consumer-centered care, clear pathways and navigation support, using peers during health education, availability of IEC materials, using simple, local language during education sessions, and health worker facilitation.ConclusionStrategies targeted at the identified factors can improve health care providers' responsiveness to the cervical cancer screening literacy needs of rural WLHIV in Eastern Uganda.
{"title":"\"Correcting Misinformation is Challenging\": Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Health Care Providers' Responsiveness to Cervical Cancer Screening Literacy Needs of Rural Women Living With HIV in Eastern Uganda.","authors":"Juliana Namutundu, Edith Nakku-Joloba, Juliet Kiguli, Fredrick Makumbi, Fred C Semitala, Rhoda K Wanyenze, Miriam Laker-Oketta, Damalie Nakanjako, Miriam Nakalembe","doi":"10.1177/10732748261419591","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261419591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCervical cancer screening literacy among rural women living with HIV (WLHIV), the ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply cervical cancer screening information to use cervical cancer screening services, is affected by individual factors including low educational attainment, low socioeconomic status, poor cervical cancer risk perception, fear, misconceptions, and beliefs, as well as interpersonal, community, and health facility barriers. However, rural public health facilities have limited resources that limit their ability mitigate these challenges. This research identified barriers and facilitators of healthcare providers' responsiveness to cervical cancer screening literacy needs of rural WLHIV in Eastern Uganda.MethodsThis was a descriptive qualitative study that involved conducting 15 Key Informant Interviews with all individuals involved in planning, communicating, and providing cervical cancer screening services at 4 purposively selected rural public health facilities in Eastern Uganda. Data were collected using a guide developed based on the organizational Health Literacy responsiveness framework. This framework was used to derive deductive categories (domains and sub-domains) during thematic analysis, and barriers and facilitators were inductively identified from the interviews.ResultsBarriers included non-involvement of health workers and affected women in planning, limited funding, few trained health workers, long waiting times, limited space, limited communication modalities, inadequate Information Education and Communication (IEC) materials, IEC materials not translated to the local language, challenges with addressing misconceptions, and language barriers. Facilitators included support from implementing partners, free cervical cancer screening services, integration of cervical cancer screening into HIV care, consumer-centered care, clear pathways and navigation support, using peers during health education, availability of IEC materials, using simple, local language during education sessions, and health worker facilitation.ConclusionStrategies targeted at the identified factors can improve health care providers' responsiveness to the cervical cancer screening literacy needs of rural WLHIV in Eastern Uganda.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261419591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12816500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
IntroductionInetetamab has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsThe multicenter retrospective study enrolled 140 patients with HER2-positive MBC who received inetetamab-based regimens between November 2020 and April 2023. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.ResultsThe median patient age was 53 (range: 27-90) years, with inetetamab-based regimens administered as first-, second-, or third-line (or later) therapy in 13 (9.3%), 29 (20.7%), and 98 (70.0%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6.1 months in the overall population, with an ORR of 35.0% and a DCR of 77.1%. Patients receiving inetetamab as first- or second-line therapy had significantly longer median PFS (14.5 months; 95% CI, 9.5-19.5) than those receiving it as third-line or later therapy (4.8 months; 95% CI, 4.2-5.3; P < 0.0001). First-line treatment resulted in a median PFS of 22.2 months. Patients previously treated with trastuzumab without HER2-TKIs had longer median PFS than those with prior TKI exposure (12.8 vs 5.7 months; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that treatment line (1-2 vs ≥3) was independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.330; 95% CI: 0.211-0.517). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included leukopenia (16.4%) and neutropenia (12.9%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.ConclusionInetetamab-based regimens have shown promising efficacy and are well-tolerated for patients with HER2-positive MBC. These anti-HER2 regimens could be considered an alternative treatment option for this disease.
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes With Inetetamab-Based Regimens for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis in China.","authors":"Fangchao Zheng, Jiale Zhang, Dongdong Zhou, Guohua Ren, Ling Qiang, Ting Wang, Fei Pan, Changping Shan, Chongsheng Xia, Fan Yang, Hongjian Wang, Guozhu Liu, Jingfen Wang, Ruimin Hua, Xin Du, Baoxuan Zhang, Huihui Li","doi":"10.1177/10732748261419187","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261419187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionInetetamab has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsThe multicenter retrospective study enrolled 140 patients with HER2-positive MBC who received inetetamab-based regimens between November 2020 and April 2023. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.ResultsThe median patient age was 53 (range: 27-90) years, with inetetamab-based regimens administered as first-, second-, or third-line (or later) therapy in 13 (9.3%), 29 (20.7%), and 98 (70.0%) patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6.1 months in the overall population, with an ORR of 35.0% and a DCR of 77.1%. Patients receiving inetetamab as first- or second-line therapy had significantly longer median PFS (14.5 months; 95% CI, 9.5-19.5) than those receiving it as third-line or later therapy (4.8 months; 95% CI, 4.2-5.3; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). First-line treatment resulted in a median PFS of 22.2 months. Patients previously treated with trastuzumab without HER2-TKIs had longer median PFS than those with prior TKI exposure (12.8 vs 5.7 months; <i>P</i> = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that treatment line (1-2 vs ≥3) was independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.330; 95% CI: 0.211-0.517). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included leukopenia (16.4%) and neutropenia (12.9%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.ConclusionInetetamab-based regimens have shown promising efficacy and are well-tolerated for patients with HER2-positive MBC. These anti-HER2 regimens could be considered an alternative treatment option for this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261419187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12816558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1177/10732748261419190
Ning Luo, Shifan Tan, Xiaocai Li, Si Liu, Shangyu Xie, Xiaoying Huang, Dong Wu
IntroductionBrain metastases (BM) represent a common and fatal progression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), yet prognostic tools for this population remain underdeveloped. This study aimed to establish and externally validate a machine learning-based model to predict overall survival (OS) in SCLC patients with BM.MethodsWe extracted clinical data from 2392 SCLC patients with BM from the SEER database to construct prognostic models using Cox regression, AJCC staging, and four machine learning algorithms: Random Survival Forest (RSF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Elastic Net (Enet), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Key features were selected via Lasso-Cox regression. Model performance was evaluated using time-dependent AUC, calibration curves, Brier scores, precision-recall (PR) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP and partial dependence plots were applied for model interpretability. External validation was conducted using an independent hospital-based cohort of 85 patients, with comparability to the SEER cohort addressed through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).ResultsAmong all models, the RSF algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance. In the training cohort, it achieved AUCs of 0.738 and 0.809 for 1-year and 2-year OS, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, AUCs were 0.718 and 0.748, and in the external validation cohort, 0.686 and 0.802, respectively. The RSF model also showed favorable calibration and the lowest Brier scores across datasets. SHAP analysis ranked chemotherapy, liver metastasis, N stage, and age as the most influential prognostic features. A web-based calculator was developed to enable real-time individualized risk prediction.ConclusionsThis study presents a robust, interpretable, and externally validated RSF-based model for predicting OS in SCLC patients with BM. The model offers clinically relevant insights and is accessible via an online tool, supporting its potential integration into personalized treatment planning.
{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning for Survival Prediction in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A Population-Based Study With External Validation.","authors":"Ning Luo, Shifan Tan, Xiaocai Li, Si Liu, Shangyu Xie, Xiaoying Huang, Dong Wu","doi":"10.1177/10732748261419190","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261419190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionBrain metastases (BM) represent a common and fatal progression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), yet prognostic tools for this population remain underdeveloped. This study aimed to establish and externally validate a machine learning-based model to predict overall survival (OS) in SCLC patients with BM.MethodsWe extracted clinical data from 2392 SCLC patients with BM from the SEER database to construct prognostic models using Cox regression, AJCC staging, and four machine learning algorithms: Random Survival Forest (RSF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Elastic Net (Enet), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Key features were selected via Lasso-Cox regression. Model performance was evaluated using time-dependent AUC, calibration curves, Brier scores, precision-recall (PR) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP and partial dependence plots were applied for model interpretability. External validation was conducted using an independent hospital-based cohort of 85 patients, with comparability to the SEER cohort addressed through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).ResultsAmong all models, the RSF algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance. In the training cohort, it achieved AUCs of 0.738 and 0.809 for 1-year and 2-year OS, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, AUCs were 0.718 and 0.748, and in the external validation cohort, 0.686 and 0.802, respectively. The RSF model also showed favorable calibration and the lowest Brier scores across datasets. SHAP analysis ranked chemotherapy, liver metastasis, N stage, and age as the most influential prognostic features. A web-based calculator was developed to enable real-time individualized risk prediction.ConclusionsThis study presents a robust, interpretable, and externally validated RSF-based model for predicting OS in SCLC patients with BM. The model offers clinically relevant insights and is accessible via an online tool, supporting its potential integration into personalized treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261419190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819985/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1177/10732748261419192
Shitao Li, Hengxu Yu
IntroductionThe influence of iodine on papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk association between varying levels of iodine intake and the occurrence of PTC and different subtypes of thyroid carcinoma (TC), particularly papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).MethodsFour databases-the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science-were systematically searched for relevant studies published up until May 30, 2024. An updated search was conducted on November 20, 2025. Literature screening and information collection were performed according to predefined eligibility criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to appraise the quality of the eligible literature. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.ResultsThis meta-analysis encompassed 17 studies involving 273 651 individuals. The findings revealed a correlation between high urinary iodine concentrations and an increased risk of TC (odds ratio [OR]: 6.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.72-15.22, P < .05). The elevated risk was observed for both PTC (OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 1.6-35.78, P < .001) and PTMC (OR: 8.96, 95% CI: 5.89-13.64, P < .001). These results suggested that greater urinary iodine concentrations were associated with a higher risk of TC. However, there was no significant association between dietary iodine intake and TC risk (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.37-1.52, P > .05).ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated a definitive link between high urinary iodine excretion and an increased risk of TC. The relationship between dietary iodine intake and TC requires further investigation. Considering the current limitations, future large-scale, multicenter, prospective investigations are anticipated to provide further validation.
碘对甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的影响仍然是一个有争议的话题。本荟萃分析旨在评估不同水平的碘摄入量与PTC和不同亚型甲状腺癌(TC),特别是乳头状甲状腺微癌(PTMC)发生之间的风险关系。方法系统检索Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed和Web of science四个数据库,检索截止到2024年5月30日发表的相关研究。2025年11月20日进行了一次更新的搜索。根据预定的资格标准进行文献筛选和信息收集。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评价符合条件的文献的质量。采用Stata 17进行统计分析。结果本荟萃分析包括17项研究,涉及273,651人。研究结果显示尿碘浓度高与TC风险增加之间存在相关性(优势比[OR]: 6.43, 95%可信区间[CI]: 2.72-15.22, P < 0.05)。PTC (OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 1.6-35.78, P < 0.001)和PTMC (OR: 8.96, 95% CI: 5.89-13.64, P < 0.001)的风险均升高。这些结果表明,尿碘浓度越高,TC的风险越高。然而,膳食碘摄入量与TC风险之间没有显著相关性(OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.37-1.52, P < 0.05)。结论:本荟萃分析表明高尿碘排泄量与TC风险增加之间存在明确的联系。膳食碘摄入量与TC之间的关系有待进一步研究。考虑到目前的局限性,未来的大规模、多中心、前瞻性研究有望提供进一步的验证。
{"title":"Dietary and Urinary Iodine in Relation to Thyroid Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shitao Li, Hengxu Yu","doi":"10.1177/10732748261419192","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10732748261419192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe influence of iodine on papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk association between varying levels of iodine intake and the occurrence of PTC and different subtypes of thyroid carcinoma (TC), particularly papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).MethodsFour databases-the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science-were systematically searched for relevant studies published up until May 30, 2024. An updated search was conducted on November 20, 2025. Literature screening and information collection were performed according to predefined eligibility criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to appraise the quality of the eligible literature. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.ResultsThis meta-analysis encompassed 17 studies involving 273 651 individuals. The findings revealed a correlation between high urinary iodine concentrations and an increased risk of TC (odds ratio [OR]: 6.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.72-15.22, <i>P</i> < .05). The elevated risk was observed for both PTC (OR: 7.56, 95% CI: 1.6-35.78, <i>P</i> < .001) and PTMC (OR: 8.96, 95% CI: 5.89-13.64, <i>P</i> < .001). These results suggested that greater urinary iodine concentrations were associated with a higher risk of TC. However, there was no significant association between dietary iodine intake and TC risk (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.37-1.52, <i>P</i> > .05).ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated a definitive link between high urinary iodine excretion and an increased risk of TC. The relationship between dietary iodine intake and TC requires further investigation. Considering the current limitations, future large-scale, multicenter, prospective investigations are anticipated to provide further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"10732748261419192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12819980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}