Lexical retrieval difficulties in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Insights from verbal fluency and naming tasks.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.13118
María González-Nosti, Arrate Barrenechea, Romina San Miguel-Abella, María Del Carmen Pérez-Sánchez, Lucía Fernández-Manzano, Ainhoa Ramírez-Arjona, Noelia Rodríguez-Pérez, Elena Herrera
{"title":"Lexical retrieval difficulties in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Insights from verbal fluency and naming tasks.","authors":"María González-Nosti, Arrate Barrenechea, Romina San Miguel-Abella, María Del Carmen Pérez-Sánchez, Lucía Fernández-Manzano, Ainhoa Ramírez-Arjona, Noelia Rodríguez-Pérez, Elena Herrera","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although considerable research has been conducted on post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), cognitive symptoms, particularly those related to language, are still not well understood.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To provide a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of language performance in PCS patients using a comprehensive set of semantic and verbal production tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods & procedures: </strong>The study involved 195 PCS patients aged 26-64 years and 50 healthy controls aged 25-61 years. Participants were assessed using two semantic tasks, three naming tasks and four types of verbal fluency tasks, designed to evaluate different aspects of language processing.</p><p><strong>Outcomes & results: </strong>PCS patients demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared with controls across all verbal fluency tasks. This was evident in both the total number of words generated and their types, with patients tending to choose more easily accessible words. In naming tasks, the pattern of errors was similar in both groups, although patients showed a higher number of non-responses and made more errors, reflecting difficulties in word retrieval. The analysis highlighted the impact of factors such as stimulus availability, educational level and cognitive reserve on performance. Notably, younger patients performed worse than older, a paradoxical trend also observed in previous research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications: </strong>These findings reveal significant word retrieval difficulties in PCS patients, suggesting that cognitive impairment related to language may be more pronounced than previously understood. The results underscore the need for a thorough evaluation of language functions in PCS patients and the development of more targeted and individualized language rehabilitation strategies to address these specific challenges.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on the subject Studies on the cognitive characteristics of CPS have focused mainly on broad-spectrum neuropsychological assessments covering all cognitive functions. However, there are very few studies analysing oral production with specific lexical and semantic system tasks. Furthermore, no work has specifically included tasks assessing semantic processing or conducted qualitative analyses of the psycholinguistic variables affecting performance. Such analyses could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study explores in depth the evaluation and analysis of the oral production of patients with PCS using several lexical and semantic tasks. In addition, psycholinguistic variables are analysed that could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The study allows the identification of specific lexical-semantic deficits in the spoken language in patients with this PCS. A more detailed assessment of the oral language of these patients, keeping in mind the psycholinguistic variables that may affect the performance, will facilitate the design of more efficient and individualized rehabilitation programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although considerable research has been conducted on post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS), cognitive symptoms, particularly those related to language, are still not well understood.

Aims: To provide a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of language performance in PCS patients using a comprehensive set of semantic and verbal production tasks.

Methods & procedures: The study involved 195 PCS patients aged 26-64 years and 50 healthy controls aged 25-61 years. Participants were assessed using two semantic tasks, three naming tasks and four types of verbal fluency tasks, designed to evaluate different aspects of language processing.

Outcomes & results: PCS patients demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared with controls across all verbal fluency tasks. This was evident in both the total number of words generated and their types, with patients tending to choose more easily accessible words. In naming tasks, the pattern of errors was similar in both groups, although patients showed a higher number of non-responses and made more errors, reflecting difficulties in word retrieval. The analysis highlighted the impact of factors such as stimulus availability, educational level and cognitive reserve on performance. Notably, younger patients performed worse than older, a paradoxical trend also observed in previous research.

Conclusions & implications: These findings reveal significant word retrieval difficulties in PCS patients, suggesting that cognitive impairment related to language may be more pronounced than previously understood. The results underscore the need for a thorough evaluation of language functions in PCS patients and the development of more targeted and individualized language rehabilitation strategies to address these specific challenges.

What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject Studies on the cognitive characteristics of CPS have focused mainly on broad-spectrum neuropsychological assessments covering all cognitive functions. However, there are very few studies analysing oral production with specific lexical and semantic system tasks. Furthermore, no work has specifically included tasks assessing semantic processing or conducted qualitative analyses of the psycholinguistic variables affecting performance. Such analyses could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This study explores in depth the evaluation and analysis of the oral production of patients with PCS using several lexical and semantic tasks. In addition, psycholinguistic variables are analysed that could undoubtedly help clarify the nature of the language impairments in patients with PCS. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The study allows the identification of specific lexical-semantic deficits in the spoken language in patients with this PCS. A more detailed assessment of the oral language of these patients, keeping in mind the psycholinguistic variables that may affect the performance, will facilitate the design of more efficient and individualized rehabilitation programmes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后 COVID-19 综合征的词汇检索困难:从言语流畅性和命名任务中获得的启示。
背景:目的:使用一套全面的语义和语言生成任务,对 PCS 患者的语言表现进行详细的定量和定性分析:研究对象包括 195 名年龄在 26-64 岁之间的 PCS 患者和 50 名年龄在 25-61 岁之间的健康对照者。研究人员使用两项语义任务、三项命名任务和四种语言流畅性任务对参与者进行评估,这些任务旨在评估语言处理的不同方面:与对照组相比,PCS 患者在所有言语流畅性任务中的表现都明显较差。这一点在产生的单词总数和单词类型上都很明显,患者倾向于选择更容易理解的单词。在命名任务中,两组患者的错误模式相似,但患者的无应答次数更多,错误也更多,这反映出他们在单词检索方面存在困难。分析强调了刺激可用性、教育水平和认知储备等因素对成绩的影响。值得注意的是,年轻患者的表现比年长者差,这在之前的研究中也发现了矛盾的趋势:这些研究结果表明,PCS 患者在单词检索方面存在严重困难,这表明与语言有关的认知障碍可能比以前所理解的更为明显。这些结果突出表明,有必要对 PCS 患者的语言功能进行全面评估,并制定更有针对性和个性化的语言康复策略,以应对这些特殊挑战:关于该主题的已知研究 关于 CPS 认知特征的研究主要集中于涵盖所有认知功能的广谱神经心理学评估。然而,很少有研究通过特定的词汇和语义系统任务来分析口语表达。此外,也没有任何研究专门包括评估语义处理的任务,或对影响表现的心理语言学变量进行定性分析。这些分析无疑有助于澄清 PCS 患者语言障碍的本质。本文对现有知识的补充 本研究利用多项词汇和语义任务,深入探讨了对 PCS 患者口语表达的评估和分析。此外,还分析了心理语言学变量,这些变量无疑有助于澄清 PCS 患者语言障碍的性质。这项研究的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?这项研究有助于确定 PCS 患者口语中存在的特定词汇-语义缺陷。对这些患者的口语进行更详细的评估,同时考虑到可能影响其表现的心理语言学变量,将有助于设计更有效和个性化的康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
期刊最新文献
Exploring vowel errors produced in nonword repetition in children with speech and language disorders. Animal-assisted services for adults with acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A scoping review. Gender and age biases in the assessment of speech accuracy: A study of speech-language clinicians' ratings of /s/ accuracy. Cultural adaptation and psychometric analysis of Communication Activities of Daily Living third edition in Spanish and Catalan for people with aphasia. Lexical retrieval difficulties in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Insights from verbal fluency and naming tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1