The order of stimuli matters when learning second-order transitional probabilities.

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Learning & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.3758/s13420-024-00646-z
Laura Lazartigues, Fabien Mathy, Carlos Aguilar, Frédéric Lavigne
{"title":"The order of stimuli matters when learning second-order transitional probabilities.","authors":"Laura Lazartigues, Fabien Mathy, Carlos Aguilar, Frédéric Lavigne","doi":"10.3758/s13420-024-00646-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The order of stimuli within sequences and the transitional probabilities (TPs) it generates are central information in sequence processing. However, less is known about what type of information and how it is extracted by general learning mechanisms. The present study focused on statistical learning of second-order TPs. Second-order TPs are involved when only the combination of two stimuli predicts the third. In a first experiment, TPs depended crucially on the order of presentation of a pair <math><mrow><mi>A</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>B</mi></mrow> </math> , which led to different predictions depending on the order of the stimuli (i.e., ABC vs. BAF). Eight visuomotor sequences governed by second-order TPs were used and response times (RTs) were recorded for each transition. The task included a learning phase followed by a switch phase during which the second-order TP were reversed (e.g., the sequences ABC and BAF became respectively ABF and BAC). A decrease of RTs between the second and the third stimulus during the learning phase and an increase of RTs during the switch phase suggested that variations of orders within second-order TPs could be learned. Further analyses, however, indicated that such learning was difficult for most participants. A second experiment showed that the difficulty of learning was not solely due to the difficulty to pick up the effect of order of presentation, but that learning second-order transitional probabilities in addition to order would be the main obstacle. These experiments suggest that statistical learning is capable of learning complex associations, even if this remains a challenge for human cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":49914,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-024-00646-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The order of stimuli within sequences and the transitional probabilities (TPs) it generates are central information in sequence processing. However, less is known about what type of information and how it is extracted by general learning mechanisms. The present study focused on statistical learning of second-order TPs. Second-order TPs are involved when only the combination of two stimuli predicts the third. In a first experiment, TPs depended crucially on the order of presentation of a pair A - B , which led to different predictions depending on the order of the stimuli (i.e., ABC vs. BAF). Eight visuomotor sequences governed by second-order TPs were used and response times (RTs) were recorded for each transition. The task included a learning phase followed by a switch phase during which the second-order TP were reversed (e.g., the sequences ABC and BAF became respectively ABF and BAC). A decrease of RTs between the second and the third stimulus during the learning phase and an increase of RTs during the switch phase suggested that variations of orders within second-order TPs could be learned. Further analyses, however, indicated that such learning was difficult for most participants. A second experiment showed that the difficulty of learning was not solely due to the difficulty to pick up the effect of order of presentation, but that learning second-order transitional probabilities in addition to order would be the main obstacle. These experiments suggest that statistical learning is capable of learning complex associations, even if this remains a challenge for human cognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习二阶过渡概率时,刺激物的顺序很重要。
序列中刺激物的顺序及其产生的过渡概率(TPs)是序列加工的核心信息。然而,人们对这种信息的类型以及一般学习机制如何提取这种信息知之甚少。本研究侧重于二阶 TPs 的统计学习。当只有两个刺激的组合才能预测第三个刺激时,二阶 TPs 就会参与其中。在第一个实验中,TPs 关键取决于一对 A - B 的呈现顺序,这导致了不同刺激顺序(即 ABC 与 BAF)下的不同预测。我们使用了八个由二阶 TPs 控制的视觉运动序列,并记录了每个过渡的反应时间(RTs)。该任务包括一个学习阶段和一个转换阶段,在这一阶段中,二阶 TP 被颠倒(例如,序列 ABC 和 BAF 分别变成 ABF 和 BAC)。在学习阶段,第二和第三个刺激之间的反应时间缩短,而在转换阶段,反应时间增加,这表明二阶 TP 的顺序变化是可以学习的。然而,进一步的分析表明,对于大多数参与者来说,这种学习是困难的。第二个实验表明,学习困难的原因并不仅仅是难以捕捉到呈现顺序的影响,除了顺序之外,学习二阶过渡概率也是主要障碍。这些实验表明,统计学习能够学习复杂的关联,尽管这对人类认知仍是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning & Behavior
Learning & Behavior 医学-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Learning & Behavior publishes experimental and theoretical contributions and critical reviews concerning fundamental processes of learning and behavior in nonhuman and human animals. Topics covered include sensation, perception, conditioning, learning, attention, memory, motivation, emotion, development, social behavior, and comparative investigations.
期刊最新文献
Are crows smart? Let them count the ways. Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation. Route learning and transport of resources during colony relocation in Australian desert ants. To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals. Noisy nests: Early-life noise exposure impacts songbird fitness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1