Miriam Menacho-Roman BSc , Martin Fabregate-Fuente BSc , Laura Caja-Guayerbas BSc , Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez BSc , Javier Soto BSc , Ignacio Arribas-Gómez PhD, MD
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Estimating 24-Hour Urinary Sodium Excretion Using Spot Urine Samples in Adult Patients","authors":"Miriam Menacho-Roman BSc , Martin Fabregate-Fuente BSc , Laura Caja-Guayerbas BSc , Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez BSc , Javier Soto BSc , Ignacio Arribas-Gómez PhD, MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The measurement of urinary<span><span><span> sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot </span>urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating </span>urinary sodium excretion.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24 h uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Design and Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cutoff value of 130 mmol/24 h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model was well calibrated (slope [95% confidence interval] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24 h uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24 h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 <em>P</em> < .0001), accuracy (the percentage of estimated 24 h uNa results within 30% deviation of measured 24 h uNa): 56.8%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95% confidence interval makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":"35 6","pages":"Pages 756-763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051227624002073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.
Objective
To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24 h uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.
Design and Methods
A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cutoff value of 130 mmol/24 h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.
Results
The model was well calibrated (slope [95% confidence interval] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24 h uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24 h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 P < .0001), accuracy (the percentage of estimated 24 h uNa results within 30% deviation of measured 24 h uNa): 56.8%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.
Conclusion
Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95% confidence interval makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.