Miriam Menacho-Roman, Martin Fabregate-Fuente, Laura Caja-Guayerbas, Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez, Javier Soto, Ignacio Arribas-Gómez
{"title":"Development and validation of a prediction model for estimating 24-Hour Urinary Sodium Excretion using spot urine samples in adult patients.","authors":"Miriam Menacho-Roman, Martin Fabregate-Fuente, Laura Caja-Guayerbas, Sergio Jiménez-Sánchez, Javier Soto, Ignacio Arribas-Gómez","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Methods: A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cut-off value of 130 mmol/24h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model was well calibrated (slope [95%CI] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 p<0.0001), accuracy (P30): 56.8%, and AUC-ROC: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95%CI makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2024.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The measurement of urinary sodium excretion provides valuable information about an individual's sodium balance and can help in the management of various medical conditions. However, the collection of 24-hour urine samples is subject to errors. Spot urine sodium (uNa) measurements are a reliable alternative to 24-hour urine collections for estimating urinary sodium excretion.
Objective: To assess whether 24-h urinary sodium excretion (24uNa) can be estimated from spot samples in adult patients who attend hospital clinics.
Design: Methods: A cross-sectional study with a development (284 patients) and a validation cohort (229 patients) was conducted at our hospital. A multivariate linear regression model was built which was compared with former models. Concordance analyses and comparison of the ability to correctly classify each patient against a prespecified uNa cut-off value of 130 mmol/24h were performed, assessed by the C-statistic.
Results: The model was well calibrated (slope [95%CI] in internal validation: 0.965 [0.947-0.987], showing good discrimination, and performed robustly in an external validation cohort (slope: 0.811 [0.675-0.946]). The mean bias between the measured and the estimated 24uNa by NaRYC was 24.85 mmol/24h [17.06-32.63]. The NaRYC had the highest values of Pearson coefficient (0.613 p<0.0001), accuracy (P30): 56.8%, and AUC-ROC: 0.822 [0.766-0.869] as compared to other seven equations.
Conclusion: Although the mean bias of the results is quite acceptable, the variability observed in the 95%CI makes not recommend the general use of a spot as a substitute of the 24-hour urine in order to estimate the total urine excretion of Na in a single subject basis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.