Chi Zhong, Ke Shi, Peiting Li, Xiaohui Qiu, Xianrui Wu, Shuyue Chen, Yang Liu, Fuying Li, Zitong Zhao, Jianda Zhou, Geao Liang, Dan Xu
{"title":"Single-cell sequencing analysis and bulk-seq identify IGFBP6 and TNFAIP6 as novel differential diagnosis markers for postburn pathological scarring.","authors":"Chi Zhong, Ke Shi, Peiting Li, Xiaohui Qiu, Xianrui Wu, Shuyue Chen, Yang Liu, Fuying Li, Zitong Zhao, Jianda Zhou, Geao Liang, Dan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>If not accurately diagnosed and treated, postburn pathological scars, such as keloids and hypertrophic scars, can lead to negative clinical outcomes. However, differential diagnosis at the molecular level for postburn pathological scars remains limited. Using single-cell sequencing analysis, we investigated the genetic nuances of pathological scars at the cellular level. This study aimed to identify molecular diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish between postburn keloids and hypertrophic scars.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-cell sequencing, differential expression, and weighted co-expression network analyses were performed to identify potential key genes for discriminating between keloids and hypertrophic scars. Postburn clinical samples were collected from our centre to validate the expression levels of the identified key genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single-cell sequencing analysis unveiled 29 and 30 cell clusters in keloids and hypertrophic scars, respectively, predominantly composed of fibroblasts. Bulk differential gene analysis showed 96 highly expressed genes and 69 lowly expressed genes in keloids compared to hypertrophic scars. By incorporating previous research, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis was conducted to select fibroblasts as the focus of research. According to the single-cell data, 301 genes were stably expressed in fibroblasts from both types of pathological scars. Consistently, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis revealed that the blue module genes were mostly hub genes associated with fibroblasts. After intersecting fibroblast-related genes in single-cell data, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis-hub module genes, and bulk differential expression genes, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 were identified as key genes to distinguish keloids from hypertrophic scars, resulting in diagnostic accuracies of 1.0 and 0.75, respectively. Immunohistochemical Staining and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR revealed that the expression levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 were significantly lower in postburn keloids than in hypertrophic scars- CONCLUSIONS: Tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6, exhibiting high diagnostic accuracy, provide valuable guidance for the differential diagnosis and treatment of postburn pathological scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.08.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: If not accurately diagnosed and treated, postburn pathological scars, such as keloids and hypertrophic scars, can lead to negative clinical outcomes. However, differential diagnosis at the molecular level for postburn pathological scars remains limited. Using single-cell sequencing analysis, we investigated the genetic nuances of pathological scars at the cellular level. This study aimed to identify molecular diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish between postburn keloids and hypertrophic scars.
Methods: Single-cell sequencing, differential expression, and weighted co-expression network analyses were performed to identify potential key genes for discriminating between keloids and hypertrophic scars. Postburn clinical samples were collected from our centre to validate the expression levels of the identified key genes.
Results: Single-cell sequencing analysis unveiled 29 and 30 cell clusters in keloids and hypertrophic scars, respectively, predominantly composed of fibroblasts. Bulk differential gene analysis showed 96 highly expressed genes and 69 lowly expressed genes in keloids compared to hypertrophic scars. By incorporating previous research, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis was conducted to select fibroblasts as the focus of research. According to the single-cell data, 301 genes were stably expressed in fibroblasts from both types of pathological scars. Consistently, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis revealed that the blue module genes were mostly hub genes associated with fibroblasts. After intersecting fibroblast-related genes in single-cell data, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis-hub module genes, and bulk differential expression genes, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 were identified as key genes to distinguish keloids from hypertrophic scars, resulting in diagnostic accuracies of 1.0 and 0.75, respectively. Immunohistochemical Staining and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR revealed that the expression levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6 were significantly lower in postburn keloids than in hypertrophic scars- CONCLUSIONS: Tumour necrosis factor alpha induced protein 6 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 6, exhibiting high diagnostic accuracy, provide valuable guidance for the differential diagnosis and treatment of postburn pathological scars.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.