Preparedness for practice, competency and skill development and learning in rural and remote clinical placements: A scoping review of the perspective and experience of health students.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10378-4
Stevie-Jae Hepburn, Syadani Riyad Fatema, Rikki Jones, Kylie Rice, Kim Usher, Jen Williams
{"title":"Preparedness for practice, competency and skill development and learning in rural and remote clinical placements: A scoping review of the perspective and experience of health students.","authors":"Stevie-Jae Hepburn, Syadani Riyad Fatema, Rikki Jones, Kylie Rice, Kim Usher, Jen Williams","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10378-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When considering health professionals' requirements and responsibilities, competence is a complex concept that extends beyond knowledge to encompass understanding, application, technical skills, problem-solving, and clinical judgment. Rural clinical placements provide a rich learning environment for students to improve their competencies, self-esteem, and preparedness for practice (PFP). This scoping review aimed to identify pre-registration health students' perspectives on rural placement regarding competency and skill development, and enablers and barriers to learning. The methodology outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute was followed. Out of 1186 records (366 duplicates), 821 were screened by title and abstract, 59 underwent full-text screening and 18 studies were included. Over half the studies included medicine students (n = 11). Reported competencies predominantly focused on self-assessed confidence regarding clinical skills. The reported barriers and enablers to learning highlighted the complexity of the placement experience and the importance of interpersonal factors, learner engagement and the supervisor's role. The review identified a gap in the literature pertaining to student perspectives of competencies and skills not assessed or experienced as well as a lack of standardised measures for PFP. The identified enablers and barriers provide suggestions for rural placement design and emphasise the importance of the student learning experience. Future research could include multiple health disciplines and specific methodologies to identify health students' perspectives regarding the development of competency, relatedness and autonomy, that is how to support health students to think, feel and act like health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10378-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When considering health professionals' requirements and responsibilities, competence is a complex concept that extends beyond knowledge to encompass understanding, application, technical skills, problem-solving, and clinical judgment. Rural clinical placements provide a rich learning environment for students to improve their competencies, self-esteem, and preparedness for practice (PFP). This scoping review aimed to identify pre-registration health students' perspectives on rural placement regarding competency and skill development, and enablers and barriers to learning. The methodology outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute was followed. Out of 1186 records (366 duplicates), 821 were screened by title and abstract, 59 underwent full-text screening and 18 studies were included. Over half the studies included medicine students (n = 11). Reported competencies predominantly focused on self-assessed confidence regarding clinical skills. The reported barriers and enablers to learning highlighted the complexity of the placement experience and the importance of interpersonal factors, learner engagement and the supervisor's role. The review identified a gap in the literature pertaining to student perspectives of competencies and skills not assessed or experienced as well as a lack of standardised measures for PFP. The identified enablers and barriers provide suggestions for rural placement design and emphasise the importance of the student learning experience. Future research could include multiple health disciplines and specific methodologies to identify health students' perspectives regarding the development of competency, relatedness and autonomy, that is how to support health students to think, feel and act like health professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村和偏远地区临床实习中的实习准备、能力和技能培养与学习:对保健专业学生的观点和经验进行范围审查。
在考虑卫生专业人员的要求和责任时,能力是一个复杂的概念,它超越了知识的范畴,包括理解、应用、技术技能、解决问题和临床判断。农村临床实习为学生提供了丰富的学习环境,以提高他们的能力、自尊和实践准备(PFP)。本次范围界定审查旨在确定注册前健康专业学生对农村实习在能力和技能发展方面的看法,以及学习的促进因素和障碍。研究采用了乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)概述的方法。在 1186 条记录(366 条重复)中,根据标题和摘要筛选出 821 条,对 59 条进行了全文筛选,并纳入了 18 项研究。半数以上的研究包括医科学生(n = 11)。所报告的能力主要集中在临床技能方面的自我评估信心。所报告的学习障碍和促进因素强调了实习经历的复杂性以及人际因素、学习者参与和导师作用的重要性。综述发现,学生对未评估或未体验过的能力和技能的看法,以及缺乏针对 PFP 的标准化测量方法等方面的文献存在空白。所发现的有利因素和障碍为农村实习设计提供了建议,并强调了学生学习体验的重要性。未来的研究可以包括多个健康学科和特定方法,以确定健康专业学生对能力、相关性和自主性发展的看法,即如何支持健康专业学生像健康专业人员一样思考、感受和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
期刊最新文献
The interpretation-use argument- the essential ingredient for high quality assessment design and validation. Correction: Self-directed learning and the student learning experience in undergraduate clinical science programs: a scoping review. Social support and academic procrastination in health professions students: the serial mediating effect of intrinsic learning motivation and academic self-efficacy. To define or not to define: a commentary on 'The case for metacognitive reflection'. Team science in interdisciplinary health professions education research: a multi-institutional case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1