Effect of Physical Activity Behaviors, Team Sports, and Sitting Time on Body Image and Exercise Dependence.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.3390/sports12090260
Emanuel Festino, Olga Papale, Francesca Di Rocco, Marianna De Maio, Cristina Cortis, Andrea Fusco
{"title":"Effect of Physical Activity Behaviors, Team Sports, and Sitting Time on Body Image and Exercise Dependence.","authors":"Emanuel Festino, Olga Papale, Francesca Di Rocco, Marianna De Maio, Cristina Cortis, Andrea Fusco","doi":"10.3390/sports12090260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate whether the type and degree of physical activity commitment (i.e., team sport athletes, highly active individuals, sedentary behavior) influence body image and exercise behavior. A total of 96 participants (46 women and 50 men; age: 22.7 ± 2.7 years; height: 170 ± 8.6 cm; weight: 67.6 ± 10.8 kg) were divided in six groups: female volleyball and male football players (student athletes classified as Tier 2), highly physically active women and men, with high sitting time completed the Body Image Dimensional Assessment and the 21-item Exercise Dependence Scale to evaluate body dissatisfaction and level of dependency on exercise. The Body Image Dimensional Assessment is a silhouette-based scale, where three direct indices are derived from the participants' responses: body dissatisfaction, sexual body dissatisfaction, and comparative body dissatisfaction. The Exercise Dependence Scale is a six-point Likert scale that evaluates seven dimensions of exercise dependence (tolerance, withdrawal, intention effects, lack of control, time, reductions in other activities, and continuance) and provides an overall score. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of different levels of physical activity, team sport participation (volleyball and football), and sedentary behavior (i.e., high sitting time) on participants' body image indices and dimensions of exercise dependence according to sex. Volleyball players showed significantly higher body dissatisfaction than football players (<i>d</i> = 0.99) and the physically active men group (<i>d</i> = 2.31), who had lower values than sedentary women group (<i>d</i> = 1.68). Football players had lower comparative body dissatisfaction values than volleyball players (<i>d</i> = 1.70) and sedentary women (<i>d</i> = 1.69), who had higher values than sedentary men (<i>d</i> = 1.04). Sedentary women had a significantly lower exercise dependence scale score than volleyball players (<i>d</i> = 1.71), football players (<i>d</i> = 1.12), and physically active men (<i>d</i> = 1.21). The findings highlight the impact of regular physical activity on body dissatisfaction and the variance in body image perceptions between the sexes. Moreover, the high exercise dependence values found in volleyball and football players and physically active men suggest an effect of intense training and maladaptive exercise behaviors, underlining the need for comprehensive strategies to address exercise dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11435772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12090260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether the type and degree of physical activity commitment (i.e., team sport athletes, highly active individuals, sedentary behavior) influence body image and exercise behavior. A total of 96 participants (46 women and 50 men; age: 22.7 ± 2.7 years; height: 170 ± 8.6 cm; weight: 67.6 ± 10.8 kg) were divided in six groups: female volleyball and male football players (student athletes classified as Tier 2), highly physically active women and men, with high sitting time completed the Body Image Dimensional Assessment and the 21-item Exercise Dependence Scale to evaluate body dissatisfaction and level of dependency on exercise. The Body Image Dimensional Assessment is a silhouette-based scale, where three direct indices are derived from the participants' responses: body dissatisfaction, sexual body dissatisfaction, and comparative body dissatisfaction. The Exercise Dependence Scale is a six-point Likert scale that evaluates seven dimensions of exercise dependence (tolerance, withdrawal, intention effects, lack of control, time, reductions in other activities, and continuance) and provides an overall score. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of different levels of physical activity, team sport participation (volleyball and football), and sedentary behavior (i.e., high sitting time) on participants' body image indices and dimensions of exercise dependence according to sex. Volleyball players showed significantly higher body dissatisfaction than football players (d = 0.99) and the physically active men group (d = 2.31), who had lower values than sedentary women group (d = 1.68). Football players had lower comparative body dissatisfaction values than volleyball players (d = 1.70) and sedentary women (d = 1.69), who had higher values than sedentary men (d = 1.04). Sedentary women had a significantly lower exercise dependence scale score than volleyball players (d = 1.71), football players (d = 1.12), and physically active men (d = 1.21). The findings highlight the impact of regular physical activity on body dissatisfaction and the variance in body image perceptions between the sexes. Moreover, the high exercise dependence values found in volleyball and football players and physically active men suggest an effect of intense training and maladaptive exercise behaviors, underlining the need for comprehensive strategies to address exercise dependence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育锻炼行为、团队运动和久坐时间对身体形象和运动依赖性的影响。
本研究旨在评估身体活动承诺的类型和程度(即团队运动运动员、高度活跃者、久坐不动者)是否会影响身体形象和运动行为。共有 96 名参与者(46 名女性和 50 名男性;年龄:22.7±2.7 岁;身高:170±8.6 厘米;体重:67.6±10.8 千克)被分为六组:女性排球运动员和男性足球运动员(被划分为第二级的学生运动员)、高运动量的女性和男性、久坐时间长的女性和男性完成了身体形象维度评估和 21 项运动依赖量表,以评估身体不满意度和对运动的依赖程度。身体形象维度评估是一个基于轮廓的量表,从参与者的回答中得出三个直接指数:身体不满意度、性身体不满意度和比较身体不满意度。运动依赖量表是一个六点李克特量表,评估运动依赖的七个维度(耐受性、戒断、意向效应、缺乏控制、时间、其他活动减少和持续性),并提供一个总分。研究人员采用多变量方差分析,根据性别研究了不同运动量、团队运动(排球和足球)参与程度和久坐行为(即久坐时间长)对参与者身体形象指数和运动依赖维度的影响。排球运动员的身体不满意度明显高于足球运动员(d = 0.99)和身体活跃的男性组(d = 2.31),而身体活跃的男性组的身体不满意度低于久坐的女性组(d = 1.68)。足球运动员的身体不满意度比较值低于排球运动员(d = 1.70)和久坐不动的女性(d = 1.69),而久坐不动的女性的身体不满意度比较值高于久坐不动的男性(d = 1.04)。久坐女性的运动依赖量表得分明显低于排球运动员(d = 1.71)、足球运动员(d = 1.12)和体育锻炼男性(d = 1.21)。研究结果凸显了经常参加体育锻炼对身体不满意度的影响,以及不同性别对身体形象认知的差异。此外,在排球和足球运动员以及运动量大的男性中发现的高运动依赖值表明,高强度训练和不适应性运动行为会产生影响,这强调了需要采取综合策略来解决运动依赖问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anthropometric Profile and Position-Specific Changes in Segmental Body Composition of Professional Football Players Throughout a Training Period. Effects of Maturation on Plantar Flexor Activity and Achilles Tendon Stiffness in Vertical Jumping: Sex Differences. Oxygenation Kinetics of Three Quadriceps Muscles During Squatting Exercise in Trained Men. Rebuilding Stability: Exploring the Best Rehabilitation Methods for Chronic Ankle Instability. Analysing the Relation between Passion, Motivation, and Subjective Well-Being in Sport: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1