Days of Antibiotic Spectrum Coverage (DASC) as a Metric for Evaluating the Impact of Prospective Audit and Feedback (PAF) against Long-Term Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13090804
Yuichi Shibata, Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Hiroshige Mikamo
{"title":"Days of Antibiotic Spectrum Coverage (DASC) as a Metric for Evaluating the Impact of Prospective Audit and Feedback (PAF) against Long-Term Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use.","authors":"Yuichi Shibata, Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13090804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on the use of inpatient broad-spectrum antibiotics for more than 10 days using days of therapy (DOT) and a novel metric called days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) to assess whether the antimicrobial spectrum was narrowed. Conducted at Aichi Medical University Hospital in Japan, the study compared a six-month baseline period (April to September 2022) with a six-month intervention period (April to September 2023). The primary outcome measures were changes in DOT/patient and DASC/patient for broad-spectrum antibiotics. Propensity score matching was performed between two periods and a total of 172 patients were included in the study (pre-intervention, n = 86; intervention, n = 86). The DASC/patient of broad-spectrum antibiotics was statistically decreased in the intervention period compared to that in the baseline period (153.3 vs. 122.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, our PAF intervention led to a switch to narrow-spectrum antimicrobial therapy without increasing all-cause 30-day mortality (5.8% vs. 5.8%, <i>p</i> = 1.0). However, the DOT/patient, DASC/patient, and DASC/DOT of all antimicrobials were not significantly changed. Our study concluded that we should reconsider the timing of PAF intervention by evaluating the effort of PAF by using DOT and DASC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on the use of inpatient broad-spectrum antibiotics for more than 10 days using days of therapy (DOT) and a novel metric called days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) to assess whether the antimicrobial spectrum was narrowed. Conducted at Aichi Medical University Hospital in Japan, the study compared a six-month baseline period (April to September 2022) with a six-month intervention period (April to September 2023). The primary outcome measures were changes in DOT/patient and DASC/patient for broad-spectrum antibiotics. Propensity score matching was performed between two periods and a total of 172 patients were included in the study (pre-intervention, n = 86; intervention, n = 86). The DASC/patient of broad-spectrum antibiotics was statistically decreased in the intervention period compared to that in the baseline period (153.3 vs. 122.7, p < 0.05). Additionally, our PAF intervention led to a switch to narrow-spectrum antimicrobial therapy without increasing all-cause 30-day mortality (5.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 1.0). However, the DOT/patient, DASC/patient, and DASC/DOT of all antimicrobials were not significantly changed. Our study concluded that we should reconsider the timing of PAF intervention by evaluating the effort of PAF by using DOT and DASC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将抗生素谱覆盖天数 (DASC) 作为评估前瞻性审核和反馈 (PAF) 对长期广谱抗生素使用影响的指标。
本研究旨在评估前瞻性审核和反馈(PAF)对住院病人使用广谱抗生素超过 10 天的影响,采用治疗天数(DOT)和一种称为抗菌谱覆盖天数(DASC)的新指标来评估抗菌谱是否缩小。该研究在日本爱知医科大学医院进行,比较了六个月基线期(2022 年 4 月至 9 月)和六个月干预期(2023 年 4 月至 9 月)。主要结果指标是广谱抗生素 DOT/患者和 DASC/患者的变化。在两个时期之间进行倾向得分匹配,共有 172 名患者被纳入研究(干预前,n = 86;干预,n = 86)。与基线期相比,干预期广谱抗生素的DASC/患者数出现了统计学上的下降(153.3 对 122.7,P < 0.05)。此外,我们的 PAF 干预措施导致患者转用窄谱抗菌药治疗,但并未增加全因 30 天死亡率(5.8% vs. 5.8%,p = 1.0)。但是,所有抗菌药物的 DOT/患者、DASC/患者和 DASC/DOT 均无显著变化。我们的研究得出结论,我们应该通过使用 DOT 和 DASC 评估 PAF 的努力程度,重新考虑 PAF 干预的时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial Effects of Metal Coatings or Physical, Chemical Modifications of Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces for Prevention of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies. Clarithromycin Modulates Neutrophilic Inflammation Induced by Prevotella intermedia in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. Commercial Silver-Based Dressings: In Vitro and Clinical Studies in Treatment of Chronic and Burn Wounds. Comparing the Outcomes of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based and Non-Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based Therapeutic Regimens in Patients with Multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections-A Meta-Analysis. Efficacy of Trichoderma spp. and Kosakonia sp. Both Independently and Combined with Fungicides against Botrytis cinerea on Strawberries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1