Validation of the Dutch Infant Crying and Parent Well-Being Screening Tool in Parents of Infants Less than 12 Months of Age

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114326
Karola de Graaf MD , Yael E.P. Kwakman BSc , Ineke de Kruijff MD, PhD , Ellen Tromp PhD , Ingrid I.E. Staal PhD , Leslie E. Katch PhD , Tiffany Burkhardt PhD , Marc A. Benninga MD, PhD , Tessa J. Roseboom PhD , Arine M. Vlieger MD, PhD
{"title":"Validation of the Dutch Infant Crying and Parent Well-Being Screening Tool in Parents of Infants Less than 12 Months of Age","authors":"Karola de Graaf MD ,&nbsp;Yael E.P. Kwakman BSc ,&nbsp;Ineke de Kruijff MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ellen Tromp PhD ,&nbsp;Ingrid I.E. Staal PhD ,&nbsp;Leslie E. Katch PhD ,&nbsp;Tiffany Burkhardt PhD ,&nbsp;Marc A. Benninga MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tessa J. Roseboom PhD ,&nbsp;Arine M. Vlieger MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Infant Crying and Parent Well-Being (ICPW) tool in identifying parents struggling with infant crying in the first year of life.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The original ICPW tool was translated into Dutch following established guidelines. The internal consistency and criterion validity of the Dutch ICPW tool were evaluated using a cross-sectional design. The translated ICPW tool and validated questionnaires on parental depression, stress, anxiety, and parenting balance were presented to parents of infants under 12 months during child health care visits and online.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey was completed by 488 parents, 400 mothers and 88 fathers. Of these, 172 participated after a child health care visit and 316 via online platforms. The Dutch ICPW showed satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.69) and excellent criterion validity with parental mental health measures (r = 0.53-0.85). ICPW scores demonstrated positive correlations with parental depression, stress, and anxiety levels, and a negative correlation with parenting balance. Both mothers and fathers with a positive ICPW screen (≥3) reported significantly higher levels of parental mental health issues compared with those with a negative screen (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The ICPW was positive in 32% of the parents (n = 155), with consistent total scores regardless of the infant's increasing age (r = −0.024, <em>P</em> = .59). The ICPW tool exhibited a strong negative predictive value (93%) for diagnosing postpartum depression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Dutch ICPW tool is a reliable and valid screening instrument for identifying parents struggling with infant crying.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 114326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347624004293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Infant Crying and Parent Well-Being (ICPW) tool in identifying parents struggling with infant crying in the first year of life.

Study design

The original ICPW tool was translated into Dutch following established guidelines. The internal consistency and criterion validity of the Dutch ICPW tool were evaluated using a cross-sectional design. The translated ICPW tool and validated questionnaires on parental depression, stress, anxiety, and parenting balance were presented to parents of infants under 12 months during child health care visits and online.

Results

The survey was completed by 488 parents, 400 mothers and 88 fathers. Of these, 172 participated after a child health care visit and 316 via online platforms. The Dutch ICPW showed satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.69) and excellent criterion validity with parental mental health measures (r = 0.53-0.85). ICPW scores demonstrated positive correlations with parental depression, stress, and anxiety levels, and a negative correlation with parenting balance. Both mothers and fathers with a positive ICPW screen (≥3) reported significantly higher levels of parental mental health issues compared with those with a negative screen (P < .001). The ICPW was positive in 32% of the parents (n = 155), with consistent total scores regardless of the infant's increasing age (r = −0.024, P = .59). The ICPW tool exhibited a strong negative predictive value (93%) for diagnosing postpartum depression.

Conclusions

The Dutch ICPW tool is a reliable and valid screening instrument for identifying parents struggling with infant crying.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰婴儿哭闹和父母幸福感 (ICPW) 筛查工具在 12 个月以下婴儿父母中的验证。
目的:评估荷兰语版《婴儿哭闹与父母福祉》(ICPW)工具在识别婴儿出生后第一年内哭闹的父母方面的可靠性和有效性:评估荷兰语版 "婴儿哭闹与父母幸福(ICPW)"工具的可靠性和有效性,以识别在婴儿出生后第一年内与婴儿哭闹作斗争的父母:研究设计:按照既定准则将原版 ICPW 工具翻译成荷兰语。采用横断面设计对荷兰语 ICPW 工具的内部一致性和标准有效性进行了评估。翻译后的 ICPW 工具和经过验证的关于父母抑郁、压力、焦虑和养育平衡的调查问卷在儿童医疗保健就诊期间和网上提供给了 12 个月以下婴儿的父母:共有 488 名家长完成了调查,其中母亲 400 人,父亲 88 人。其中,172 人是在儿童保健就诊后参与调查的,316 人是通过在线平台参与调查的。荷兰语 ICPW 的内部一致性(α = 0.69)令人满意,与父母心理健康测量的标准效度(r = 0.53-0.85)极佳。ICPW 分数与父母的抑郁、压力和焦虑水平呈正相关,与养育平衡呈负相关。ICPW筛查结果呈阳性(≥3)的母亲和父亲与筛查结果呈阴性(p < 0.001)的母亲和父亲相比,其父母的心理健康问题水平明显更高。32%的父母(n=155)的ICPW筛查结果呈阳性,无论婴儿的年龄增长与否,其总分都是一致的(r = -0.024,p = 0.59)。ICPW 工具对产后抑郁症的诊断具有很高的阴性预测值(93%):荷兰 ICPW 工具是一种可靠有效的筛查工具,可用于识别因婴儿哭闹而挣扎的父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Infant Botulism - Correction to "Cognitive Bias in an Infant with Constipation". Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula Is Associated with Consanguinity in the Bedouins of the Negev. Balancing Blood Product Wastage and Patient Safety: Primum Non Nocere. Blood Product Wastage and Exchange Transfusion: Caveat Medicus. The Multidimensional Condition of Systemic Cooling Poverty Affecting Children's Health Worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1