Density and Time Characteristics of CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.

Diogo G L Edelmuth, Timothy J Amrhein, Peter G Kranz
{"title":"Density and Time Characteristics of CSF-Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.","authors":"Diogo G L Edelmuth, Timothy J Amrhein, Peter G Kranz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The conspicuity of CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) on specialized myelographic imaging protocols varies, and the factors that determine their visibility have not yet been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effect of 2 variables on CVF visibility: timing of imaging and intrathecal contrast attenuation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 24 patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension due to a CVF who underwent a total of 34 CT myelographies was studied. All CTM acquisitions that included the level of the known definite CVF were evaluated for 1) time passed after injection of contrast, 2) attenuation of the adjacent subarachnoid space, 3) subjective visibility of the CVF on that series, 4) attenuation of the corresponding draining vein, and 5) contrast dose used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 acquisitions included the level of the known CVFs. Attenuation values of the thecal sac were significantly higher in acquisitions where the CVFs were definitely visible (average 2283 HU) than in acquisitions where the CVFs were equivocal or not visible (764 HU and 583 HU, respectively). No significant difference was shown in the timing of the acquisitions between the 3 groups (12.8 minutes, 20.4 minutes, and 17.5 minutes, respectively). Multivariate linear regression showed thecal sac attenuation to be the only independent predictor of the attenuation of the CVF draining vein. Time passed after contrast injection was not independently correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intrathecal contrast attenuation has a strong positive relationship with the visibility of CVF. Timing of the acquisition was not an independent predictor of CVF visibility under our acquisition protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"832-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The conspicuity of CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) on specialized myelographic imaging protocols varies, and the factors that determine their visibility have not yet been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effect of 2 variables on CVF visibility: timing of imaging and intrathecal contrast attenuation.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of 24 patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension due to a CVF who underwent a total of 34 CT myelographies was studied. All CTM acquisitions that included the level of the known definite CVF were evaluated for 1) time passed after injection of contrast, 2) attenuation of the adjacent subarachnoid space, 3) subjective visibility of the CVF on that series, 4) attenuation of the corresponding draining vein, and 5) contrast dose used.

Results: A total of 131 acquisitions included the level of the known CVFs. Attenuation values of the thecal sac were significantly higher in acquisitions where the CVFs were definitely visible (average 2283 HU) than in acquisitions where the CVFs were equivocal or not visible (764 HU and 583 HU, respectively). No significant difference was shown in the timing of the acquisitions between the 3 groups (12.8 minutes, 20.4 minutes, and 17.5 minutes, respectively). Multivariate linear regression showed thecal sac attenuation to be the only independent predictor of the attenuation of the CVF draining vein. Time passed after contrast injection was not independently correlated.

Conclusions: Intrathecal contrast attenuation has a strong positive relationship with the visibility of CVF. Timing of the acquisition was not an independent predictor of CVF visibility under our acquisition protocol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发性颅内低血压患者 CT 髓造影上 CSF-静脉瘘的密度和时间特征
背景和目的:CSF-静脉瘘(CVF)在专门的脊髓造影方案中的可见度各不相同,而决定其可见度的因素尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在确定两个变量对 CVF 可见性的相对影响:成像时间和鞘内造影剂密度:回顾性队列:24 例因 CVF 引起的自发性颅内低血压患者,他们共接受了 34 次 CT 髓图检查。对所有包含已知明确 CVF 水平的 CTM 采集进行评估,评估内容包括:(1)注射造影剂后的时间;(2)邻近蛛网膜下腔的衰减;(3)该序列上 CVF 的主观可见度;(4)相应引流静脉的衰减;(5)所用造影剂剂量:结果:共有 131 次采集包括了已知的 CVF 水平。膀胱囊的衰减值在明确可见 CVF 的采集中(平均 2283 HU)明显高于 CVF 不明确或不可见的采集(分别为 764 HU 和 583 HU)。三组采集时间无明显差异(分别为 12.8 分钟、20.4 分钟和 17.5 分钟)。多变量线性回归显示,膀胱囊密度是 CVF 引流静脉密度的唯一独立预测因素,而注射造影剂后的时间并不独立相关:结论:鞘内造影剂密度与 CVF 的可见度有很强的正相关性。结论:鞘内造影剂密度与 CVF 可见度有很强的正相关关系,在我们的采集方案中,采集时间不是 CVF 可见度的独立预测因素:LDCTM = 侧卧位 CT 髓造影;CVF = CSF-静脉瘘;IOCM = 碘造影剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning-Based Collateral Scoring on Multiphase CTA in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Region. Deep Learning-Based Acceleration in MRI: Current Landscape and Clinical Applications in Neuroradiology. Study of Cerebellar Network Dynamics in Post-Stroke Aphasia Patients Based on Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Altered connectome gradient and its association with gene expression profiles in MELAS patients with stroke-like episodes. Venous Drainage Patterns of the Cavernous Sinus: A Retrospective Angiographic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1