Opposite-direction spatial working memory biases in people with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

James M Gold, Sonia Bansal, Benjamin Robinson, Alan Anticevic, Steven J Luck
{"title":"Opposite-direction spatial working memory biases in people with schizophrenia and healthy controls.","authors":"James M Gold, Sonia Bansal, Benjamin Robinson, Alan Anticevic, Steven J Luck","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with schizophrenia (PSZ) show Impaired accuracy in spatial working memory (SWM), thought to reflect abnormalities in the sustained firing of feature selective neurons that are critical for successful encoding and maintenance processes. Recent research has documented a new source of variance in the accuracy of SWM: In healthy adults, SWM representations are unconsciously biased by prior trials such that current-trial responses are attracted to previous-trial responses (serial dependence). This opens a new window to examine how schizophrenia impacts both the sustained neural firing representing the current-trial target and longer-term synaptic plasticity that stores previous-trial information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined response accuracy in a single-item SWM test with delay intervals of 0, 2, 4, or 8 seconds in 41 PSZ and 32 demographically similar healthy controls (HCS). Our main dependent variable was the bias index, which quantifies the extent to which the current-trial responses were biased toward or away from the previous-trial target.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSZ showed opposite-direction serial dependence bias effects: HCS showed an attractive bias which increased over increasing delays whereas PSZ showed a repulsion bias that increased over delays. In PSZ, the magnitude of the repulsion bias correlated negatively with broad measures of cognitive ability and WM capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSZ show opposite-direction effects of previous trials on WM. Such qualitatively distinct differences in performance are extremely rare in psychopathology and may index a fundamental alteration in neural processing that could serve as a valuable biomarker for pathophysiology and treatment development research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with schizophrenia (PSZ) show Impaired accuracy in spatial working memory (SWM), thought to reflect abnormalities in the sustained firing of feature selective neurons that are critical for successful encoding and maintenance processes. Recent research has documented a new source of variance in the accuracy of SWM: In healthy adults, SWM representations are unconsciously biased by prior trials such that current-trial responses are attracted to previous-trial responses (serial dependence). This opens a new window to examine how schizophrenia impacts both the sustained neural firing representing the current-trial target and longer-term synaptic plasticity that stores previous-trial information.

Methods: We examined response accuracy in a single-item SWM test with delay intervals of 0, 2, 4, or 8 seconds in 41 PSZ and 32 demographically similar healthy controls (HCS). Our main dependent variable was the bias index, which quantifies the extent to which the current-trial responses were biased toward or away from the previous-trial target.

Results: PSZ showed opposite-direction serial dependence bias effects: HCS showed an attractive bias which increased over increasing delays whereas PSZ showed a repulsion bias that increased over delays. In PSZ, the magnitude of the repulsion bias correlated negatively with broad measures of cognitive ability and WM capacity.

Conclusions: PSZ show opposite-direction effects of previous trials on WM. Such qualitatively distinct differences in performance are extremely rare in psychopathology and may index a fundamental alteration in neural processing that could serve as a valuable biomarker for pathophysiology and treatment development research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症患者和健康对照组的反方向空间工作记忆偏差。
背景:精神分裂症(PSZ)患者的空间工作记忆(SWM)准确性受损,这被认为反映了特征选择神经元持续发射的异常,而特征选择神经元对于成功编码和维持过程至关重要。最近的研究发现了空间工作记忆准确性差异的一个新来源:在健康的成年人中,空间工作记忆表征会不自觉地受到先前试验的影响,从而使当前试验的反应被先前试验的反应所吸引(序列依赖)。这为研究精神分裂症如何影响代表当前试验目标的持续神经发射和存储先前试验信息的长期突触可塑性打开了一扇新窗口:我们研究了 41 名精神分裂症患者和 32 名在人口统计学上相似的健康对照者(HCS)在延迟间隔为 0、2、4 或 8 秒的单项 SWM 测试中的反应准确性。我们的主要因变量是偏差指数,它量化了当前试验的反应偏向或偏离上一试验目标的程度:结果:PSZ 显示了反方向的序列依赖偏倚效应:HCS表现出的吸引偏向随着延迟的增加而增加,而PSZ表现出的排斥偏向随着延迟的增加而增加。在 PSZ 中,排斥偏差的大小与认知能力和 WM 能力的广泛测量呈负相关:结论:PSZ 表现出先前试验对 WM 的反方向影响。这种表现上截然不同的定性差异在精神病理学中极为罕见,可能表明神经处理过程发生了根本性的改变,可作为病理生理学和治疗开发研究的重要生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity. Aperiodic (1/f) neural activity robustly tracks symptom severity changes in treatment-resistant depression. Increased Amygdala Activation during Symptom Provocation Predicts Response to Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Exposure Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Decoding mindfulness with multivariate predictive models. The reward positivity as a predictor of first lifetime onsets of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in high-risk adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1