Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years.

Ann M Decker, Sandra Stuhr, Tiziano Testori, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years.","authors":"Ann M Decker, Sandra Stuhr, Tiziano Testori, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/cid.13389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a surgical procedure intended to increase the volume of the bone vertically to accommodate dental implant placement. This intervention is frequently required for implant installation in the posterior maxilla, where the bone may be insufficient for securing implants of necessary length and stability. Sinus floor elevation can be completed either through a direct approach with a \"window\" through the lateral wall of the alveolar ridge or an indirect \"transcrestal/transalveolar\" sinus floor elevation (TSFE), which accesses the sinus floor through the crest of the edentulous ridge. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive scoping review of research conducted over the past 25 years on TSFE, specifically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search aimed at identifying pertinent literature for the purpose of this PRISMA-ScR-compliant scoping review was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series that met the eligibility criteria were selected. Relevant data from these studies were extracted. Primary outcome measures included radiographic bone levels and implant failure >5 years. Secondary outcome measures included implant stability at time of placement and complications. Interventions reported in the selected studies were grouped based on treatment modality, which were then compared with the control therapy (traditional osteotome technique) after a minimum of 12 months healing period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 633 records, and after deduplication, 574 of these were screened. Application of the eligibility criteria led to the inclusion of 37 articles in the final selection. Case selection for included studies enrolling subjects: Four different transcrestal sinus elevation treatment modalities were identified: (a) osteotome, (b) piezoelectric surgery, (c) osseodensification, and (d) hydraulic techniques. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no superior approach for TSFE could be identified. Overall, all techniques demonstrated high implant survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comprehensive understanding of the patient's medical history, available armamentarium, and post-operative complications/management strategies are all essential to the completion of a successful TSFE approach for implant placement in the posterior maxilla, regardless of the treatment modality used.</p>","PeriodicalId":93944,"journal":{"name":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical implant dentistry and related research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maxillary sinus floor elevation is a surgical procedure intended to increase the volume of the bone vertically to accommodate dental implant placement. This intervention is frequently required for implant installation in the posterior maxilla, where the bone may be insufficient for securing implants of necessary length and stability. Sinus floor elevation can be completed either through a direct approach with a "window" through the lateral wall of the alveolar ridge or an indirect "transcrestal/transalveolar" sinus floor elevation (TSFE), which accesses the sinus floor through the crest of the edentulous ridge. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive scoping review of research conducted over the past 25 years on TSFE, specifically.

Methods: A literature search aimed at identifying pertinent literature for the purpose of this PRISMA-ScR-compliant scoping review was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series that met the eligibility criteria were selected. Relevant data from these studies were extracted. Primary outcome measures included radiographic bone levels and implant failure >5 years. Secondary outcome measures included implant stability at time of placement and complications. Interventions reported in the selected studies were grouped based on treatment modality, which were then compared with the control therapy (traditional osteotome technique) after a minimum of 12 months healing period.

Results: Our search yielded 633 records, and after deduplication, 574 of these were screened. Application of the eligibility criteria led to the inclusion of 37 articles in the final selection. Case selection for included studies enrolling subjects: Four different transcrestal sinus elevation treatment modalities were identified: (a) osteotome, (b) piezoelectric surgery, (c) osseodensification, and (d) hydraulic techniques. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, no superior approach for TSFE could be identified. Overall, all techniques demonstrated high implant survival rates.

Conclusion: Comprehensive understanding of the patient's medical history, available armamentarium, and post-operative complications/management strategies are all essential to the completion of a successful TSFE approach for implant placement in the posterior maxilla, regardless of the treatment modality used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经蝶窦隆鼻术后的临床和影像学变化:对过去 25 年研究的综述。
简介上颌窦底抬高术是一种外科手术,旨在垂直增加骨量,以适应牙科植入物的植入。在上颌后部安装种植体时经常需要进行这种干预,因为那里的骨量可能不足以确保种植体达到必要的长度和稳定性。上颌窦底抬高术可以通过在牙槽嵴侧壁开 "窗 "的直接方法完成,也可以通过通过无牙槽嵴嵴进入上颌窦底的间接 "跨嵴/跨牙槽 "上颌窦底抬高术(TSFE)完成。我们的研究旨在全面回顾过去 25 年来对 TSFE 的研究:方法:我们进行了一次文献检索,目的是为此次符合 PRISMA-ScR 标准的范围综述确定相关文献。只选择了符合资格标准的随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、前瞻性队列研究和病例系列研究。从这些研究中提取了相关数据。主要结果指标包括放射学骨水平和种植体失败 >5 年。次要结果指标包括植入时的种植体稳定性和并发症。所选研究中报告的干预措施根据治疗方式进行分组,然后与至少 12 个月愈合期后的对照疗法(传统截骨技术)进行比较:结果:我们的搜索共获得 633 条记录,经过重复筛选后,其中 574 条记录入选。根据资格标准,最终筛选出 37 篇文章。纳入研究对象的病例选择:确定了四种不同的经骨窦提升治疗方法:(a) 截骨器、(b) 压电手术、(c) 骨增生和 (d) 液压技术。由于研究的异质性,无法确定 TSFE 的优越方法。总的来说,所有技术都显示出较高的种植体存活率:结论:无论采用哪种治疗方式,全面了解患者的病史、可用设备和术后并发症/管理策略对于成功完成上颌后部种植体植入的 TSFE 方法都至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Photogrammetry, Intraoral Scanning, and Conventional Impression for Multiple Implants: An In Vitro Study. The Effect of NiTi Brush, Polishing Brush, and Chemical Agent on the Dental Implant Surface Morphology and Cytocompatibility. Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series. Budget Impact Analysis: Digital Workflow Significantly Reduces Costs of Implant Supported Overdentures (IODs). Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hydrophilic Implants: A 10-Year Study in a Specialist Private Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1