A Study to Assess the Practice of Incentive Spirometer Among Postoperative Patients at a Selected Hospital.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_565_24
V Beautily, M Shanthanu, D Alfred Solomon, R Hemavathi
{"title":"A Study to Assess the Practice of Incentive Spirometer Among Postoperative Patients at a Selected Hospital.","authors":"V Beautily, M Shanthanu, D Alfred Solomon, R Hemavathi","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_565_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study was aimed to assess the practice of incentive spirometer among postoperative patients at selected hospital.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A descriptive observational study design with nonprobability purposive sampling was adopted to conduct a study among 60 postoperative patients of general surgery in patient department. Data were gathered by structured questionnaires using demographic variables and biological parameters. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the procedure. Collected data were analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The results revealed that the Day 1, 27 (54%) had inadequate practice, 20 (40%) had moderately adequate practice, and 3 (6%) had adequate practice. On Day 2, 20 (40%) had adequate practice, 20 (40%) had moderately adequate practice, and 10 (20%) had inadequate practice. On Day 3, 36 (72%) had adequate practice, 8 (16%) had moderately adequate practice, and 6 (12%) had inadequate practice. The demographic variables did not shown statistically significant association with level of practice of flow-oriented incentive spirometer among the postoperative patients on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2871-S2873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_565_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current study was aimed to assess the practice of incentive spirometer among postoperative patients at selected hospital.

Material and method: A descriptive observational study design with nonprobability purposive sampling was adopted to conduct a study among 60 postoperative patients of general surgery in patient department. Data were gathered by structured questionnaires using demographic variables and biological parameters. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the procedure. Collected data were analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Result: The results revealed that the Day 1, 27 (54%) had inadequate practice, 20 (40%) had moderately adequate practice, and 3 (6%) had adequate practice. On Day 2, 20 (40%) had adequate practice, 20 (40%) had moderately adequate practice, and 10 (20%) had inadequate practice. On Day 3, 36 (72%) had adequate practice, 8 (16%) had moderately adequate practice, and 6 (12%) had inadequate practice. The demographic variables did not shown statistically significant association with level of practice of flow-oriented incentive spirometer among the postoperative patients on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估选定医院术后患者使用激励式肺活量计情况的研究。
背景本研究旨在评估选定医院术后患者使用肺活量计的情况:采用描述性观察研究设计和非概率目的性抽样,对病人科的 60 名普外科术后患者进行了研究。通过结构化问卷调查收集了人口统计学变量和生物参数数据。整个过程均保密。收集的数据采用描述性和推论性统计方法进行分析:结果显示,第 1 天,27 人(54%)练习不够充分,20 人(40%)练习适度充分,3 人(6%)练习充分。第二天,20 人(40%)练习充分,20 人(40%)练习适度充分,10 人(20%)练习不足。第三天,36 人(72%)练习充分,8 人(16%)练习适度充分,6 人(12%)练习不足。人口统计学变量与术后患者在第 1 天、第 2 天和第 3 天使用以流量为导向的激励式肺活量计的程度没有明显的统计学关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Long-Term Effects and Patient Satisfaction following TMJ Disc Replacement Surgery. Assessment of Long-Term Pulmonary Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Assessment of Prosthodontic Status and Treatment Needs of Patients Visiting Dental Institutions of Punjab. Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: Retrospective Study of Clinical Presentations. Assessment of the Association between Socioeconomic Factors and Dental Health Disparities Over a Decade.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1